ADLIan
Members-
Posts
767 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Everything posted by ADLIan
-
Probably not - total lack of any technical info. High performance mineral wool would be best option.
-
XPS. OK below dpc.
- 1 reply
-
- spray foam
- eps
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
As an alternative simply confirm all fittings comply with Table 2.1 in AD G!
- 19 replies
-
- 3
-
-
-
- part g
- water calcs
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Re linear thermal bridges. The difference between the default y-value (0.15) and the calculated value from a more detailed analysis using ACDs may only about 3 SAP points. However it will make a massive difference in CO2 emissions (DER) and the fabric energy efficiency (DFEE). Probably enough to result in an overall Building Reg failure on these 2 criteria.
-
Design SAP and sunamp
ADLIan replied to vivienz's topic in Energy Efficient & Sustainable Design Concepts
Bringing this back to the top in the absence of further information. The original assessor is correct, the Sunamp adds nothing to the electric heating and it is treated as an instantaneous space & water heater, no thermal store is accounted for. The fact that the house is all electric will account for the relatively low EPC rating even if very well insulated, the PV helping the rating though.- 18 replies
-
- heat storage
- design sap
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Design SAP and sunamp
ADLIan replied to vivienz's topic in Energy Efficient & Sustainable Design Concepts
Got to agree. More useful if public to be any use for the OP. Noticed this was discussed on here a couple of years ago with no real resolution.- 18 replies
-
- heat storage
- design sap
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Design SAP and sunamp
ADLIan replied to vivienz's topic in Energy Efficient & Sustainable Design Concepts
@vivienz have you discussed this with your SAP assessor? Could be that he is treating the sunamp correctly within SAP. An all electric house will prove difficult to get a pass, due to the high CO2 emissions, unless PV used. Perhaps someone from sunamp ( @AndyT ) will be along soon to advise. Also all linear thermal bridges should be noted and assessed so this listing should be there and is important.- 18 replies
-
- heat storage
- design sap
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Note that SAP 'approved' product must be used if you want to take advantage of this technology. Also don't expect any meaningful improvement in SAP rating (+1 point if lucky?) or CO2 emissions (less than 0.5 kg CO2/m2/yr reduction?) depending upon system, water use etc, etc.
-
Just not happy about the concept of joist hangers.
ADLIan replied to epsilonGreedy's topic in Floor Structures
There are 2 basic types of joist hanger - onto masonry and onto a timber ledger. The masonry ones are built into the mortar beds and hook over the block - they are not nailed. The others are nailed onto the timber ledger. In both instances manufacturers give very strict fixing instructions.- 20 replies
-
- joist hangers
- metal joist hanger
- (and 6 more)
-
I’m an accredited assessor. PM if you need more info.
-
Hi Mike. Don’t want to rain on your parade but I’m not sure the fire resistance value for the floor can simply be extended to cover the wall too. Also from memory the white book gives solutions for one hour fire resistance based on solid timber studs plus plasterboard - note different stud sizes for 30min & 60min.
- 30 replies
-
- building control
- part f
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Surface spread of flame (Class 0 etc) is a different part of BS 476 than the fire resistance tests. A Class 0 facing material does not automatically give 30min or 60min resistance (PUR insulation can be Class 0 and look at Grenfell). For external walls normally 60min resistance is required from BOTH sides. It appears that I-joists are being used and this may be the issue as they are only as strong as the relatively thin web in the BS 476 fire resistance test and this may be ringing alarm bells with your BCO. Perhaps have a chat with the I-joist manufacturer as there is no mathematical modelling here, reliance is made on actual test results.
- 30 replies
-
- building control
- part f
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
They meet Regs provided you know the solutions (they wouldn’t have a market otherwise). Normally use mineral wool so acoustic performance is fine.
-
Don't think this one has been covered here and been slipped into AD L1A/B when no one was looking. The Domestic Building Services Compliance Guide has been updated and effective April 2018 promotes the use of more complex control systems and flue gas heat recovery. See the Planning Portal website. Ian Full link below https://www.planningportal.co.uk/info/200135/approved_documents/74/part_l_-_conservation_of_fuel_and_power/5
-
- 1
-
-
Buying the house next door...
ADLIan replied to MikeGrahamT21's topic in General Self Build & DIY Discussion
Changing 2 houses into one may require planning permission (material change of use) but depends upon local policy (one less house in the area is the issue). Building Reg required including Appr Doc L1B which dictates required U-values and upgrades required, though BCOs have a lot of flexibility in allowing relaxation of some of these (not being able to afford the upgrades is not an allowable relaxation I'm afraid). The new dwelling may also require an on construction EPC on completion. -
The fire rated foam (and mastic, putty etc) is for fire stopping where services penetrate a fire rated wall and NOT intended for cavity barriers (see Appr Doc B). Also not sure you can make your own as most manufactured products appear to have certification to show at least 30 min protection when tested to BS 476, part ??. Best check with your BCO.
-
In a warm pitched roof it is acceptable to put a limited amount of insulation between the rafters (depends on thermal resistance of this layer). In a warm flat roof additional insulation should not be used between the roof joists. Probably OK in a limited area, but keep to minimum above the wall head, to improve sound insulation.
-
Building Regs / Funding chicken and egg
ADLIan replied to Incipiens Mox's topic in Building Regulations
Item 35 is a requirement of the Regs but very rarely enforced. The actual wording is a bit vague - a full 20+ page report would look great but a simple, single paragraph statement has been accepted by BCOs. Perhaps keep statement short & simple and hope this satisfies BC. -
Both mineral wool rolls and slabs will do the same job acoustically. See AD E which recommends mineral wool, min density 10 kg/m3, min thickness of 100mm in intermediate floors and 25mm in stud walls. Rolls normally cheaper than slabs. Do not over fill studs and compress the insulation, especially with dense slabs, as this will acoustically couple the layers of plasterboard and degrade the overall performance.
-
Requirement was U=0.22 from memory. I'm sure older versions of Regs are archived on DCLG website.
- 1 reply
-
- insulation
- polyurethane insulation
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Flooring underlay on top of concrete subfloor
ADLIan replied to mike2016's topic in Wood & Laminate Flooring
Not sure about that Nick. See instructions/recommendations from both flooring and insulation manufacturers. Problem is lots of relatively narrow planks rather than large area of flooring grade chipboard. -
Flooring underlay on top of concrete subfloor
ADLIan replied to mike2016's topic in Wood & Laminate Flooring
Use correct underlay for laminate floor. Celotex, or similar, is not suitable for use directly under laminate flooring. -
U-vals look to be correct for brick outer and probably only slightly higher with cladding of weather or render board.
-
+1 JSH. PUR manufacturers sell heavily on conductivity - try selling 0.023 product against 0.022 product and you’re dead in the water! 4.5% degradation does not sound much but on 8 years production it adds up. Temp variation effect on conductivity is not important here compared to USA which has massive changes in climate from north to south. Under BS conductivity is normally measured at mean 10K (0C - 20C).
