jack

Welcome to Buildhub. Can't help you with your question, but that sounds like an amazing project. Edited to add: here's @jamiehamy's blog: www.theoldwatertank.blogspot.com

So 1 July (2017, at least) has been and gone. Let's see pics of the finished job @daiking. We're dying to know how it turned out!

All the best for a speedy recovery.

Sorry to hear that. Only a tiny proportion of people behave like this but they generate misery out of all proportion to their numbers. Hope the gazebo leaks on them.

Yes, you do.

Yes to all those things. Worth doing some modelling though. We're used to dealing with moderately cold winters and mostly mild summers in the UK. The sort of climate you're talking about is a huge extreme in the other direction. You might, for example, need to consider how to deal with moisture movement within the structure. The interior will be cooler and lower humidity than the outside. This might mean taking a different approach to vapour control than we'd take in the UK.

If you have good insulation and airtightness, I think you'd be fine not running the cooling overnight. If the slab and air temp is kept in the high teens or low 20s during the day (or whatever temperature is needed to keep condensation at bay), it shouldn't get that much hotter overnight. In that sort of climate I'd also definitely consider underfloor cooling upstairs (and maybe even cooling of some internal walls). That will tend to keep the temperature more stable throughout the house. You're right to try and control solar gain. Basically your scenario is about as extreme as it gets, so I'd be using every available technique to keep the heat out, and the cool in. By definition, the Passivhaus standard requires high levels of insulation. Bear in mind, though, that where you have several months during which temperatures are permanently well above comfort levels, no amount of insulation will keep you cool forever - serious active cooling is absolutely going to be a requirement. My preference in this situation would be slab cooling, with aircon to keep humidity levels down. (Actually, my preference would be to move somewhere cold, as I can't stand the heat. I'd never, ever leave the house if I lived somewhere that regularly topped 40 C!)

If it's that hot, I assume there's lots of solar energy available. Given the cost of installing and maintaining a GSHP system, you're probably better off with a decent photovoltaic array driving an air conditioning system (and/or perhaps using underfloor cooling - if it's regularly into the 40s, I suspect underfloor cooling will make things feel a lot more pleasant).

Yeah, it's good stuff. I still have a bit left over from the build.

Nice use of unistrut @Onoff!

If had a quid for every time I was asked this, I wouldn't have needed a mortgage.

My impression (and it's just an impression) is that ordinary houses just aren't big or complex enough to justify the sort of integrated M&E design that you might get on a large commercial project. If you do find someone, I'm going to take a stab and say that they'll be eye-wateringly expensive. I wouldn't have suggested an AV company as a likely lead in this area, for the reasons you mention. Are you planning a lot of complex systems that will need integrating and/or designing/fitting around each other? If not, then I suspect you'll be fine having individual trades taking care of their respective areas. If you're having home automation, it's probably useful if they do all the electrics. The main things to remember are that plumbing (and drainage in particular) isn't very flexible, so you want to make sure you have clear paths with the required falls mapped out. MVHR is a little more flexible, but still has a lot of constraints in terms of needing to be relatively straight and with no "dips", plus you need to make sure the main unit is positioned sensibly in the house (ie, as centrally as possible, but with minimal length runs to the outside of the house). Other than those two, other services have a fair bit more flexibility, and can usually work around whatever's there.

We have a public path that runs down the side of our property into the countryside, so we get a lot of locals passing. Although we get lots of positive comments about our very modern house, I've been surprised how willing people - even people we know well enough to have a quick chat with - are to make properly negative comments. I don't mind the "it's nice, although I prefer traditional buildings" comments. We get those a lot. I usually reply by pointing out that modernist buildings are nearly a century old (eg: Villa Savoye), and that every era in history has had its own architecture. I then ask whether we should now just build pastiches of Georgian and 1930s architecture forever into the future. Usually shuts them up, even if they don't agree. One chap I know reasonably well saw our brick slips going up and said they looked good. I said thanks, and they'll look even better once they've been painted white. "Oh no, I don't like that at all". "No worries, feel free not to paint your own house then". I get it that some people don't like modern houses. I don't get how willing people are to make positively rude comments directly to my face!

My wife and I have discussed using exactly that approach if we ever needed to sell our house. "It's meets several of the passivhaus standard requirements" doesn't mean anything like as much to the average person as "We average £600 a year for all utilities". That said, this approach still assumes that PH is just about energy consumption. I believe the PH people would argue that their methodology includes comfort, building health (eg, thermal bridging managed to avoid condensation problems) and other factors that won't be captured by utility bills.

Agreed. If you don't get it certified, how does a future buyer know that you did everything properly? First, the PH standard involves a lot more than just airtightness and insulation standards. I think a lot of people think that just meeting those two marks makes a house more or less PH standard, but there are also a huge number of other factors. There are limiting values for everything from glazing U-values to MVHR performance to thermal bridging, for example. Second, even if you do everything to the required standards, how does the potential buyer know that you didn't cut corners? For example, let's say you introduced cold bridging with some of your steelwork, because it turned out it was cheaper to do it that way than with a more expensive thermally broken approach. A buyer is unlikely to pick up such a change. Building control won't care as long as the change meets building regs. Certification is not just about ticking some boxes in a spreadsheet before building commences. It involves careful oversight at every stage of the build to ensure that the building is constructed in the way it was designed. I was told, for example, that we'd need to photograph every junction in the house at several stages of construction to show that what was designed was what was being built. That said, of course you don't need certification. We went back and forth on this issue several times, until eventually we decided that it just wasn't worth the extra cost and effort (incidentally: @JSHarris, I doubt you can get away with £1500 additional cost for certification. I estimate a minimum of twice that, and more likely quite a bit more). If we were in Germany and buyers understood the PH standard and were willing to pay a premium, it would likely make perfect financial sense. But we're not, and it doesn't.

Great news, thanks!

I have a Brink Excellent 400 Plus (without the internet module unfortunately - that became an option after I bought mine, and I don't know whether it can be retrofitted). I got the Plus model specifically so I could use CO2 sensing, but in the end decided it was too complex. From memory, the Brink CO2 sensors are rebadged units that can be sourced elsewhere for half the price.

A friend of mine is one of the owners of themodernhouse.net. He says that very modern houses put off a lot of people, but the ones that aren't put off tend to absolutely love them, and are willing to pay a significant premium not to live in a dull developer-type house.

In that case, I make it about 210 degrees.

Eyeballing it, 120 degrees (or 60 degrees west). Edited to add: I have no idea what convention is used in this context.

The LABC may be a separate body, but local authority inspectors are council employees. Whether there's a practical difference, on average, between private and public building control inspection is probably impossible to generalise. But you're right, it looks like the local authority inspectors did the work. No idea where I got the contrary idea - I'm sure I read it somewhere last week!

I think I read it was privately inspected.

I assume the gap is there because there's no point having a ventilated rainscreen without ventilation. How to you ventilate such a void without providing a path for fire? Intumescent horizontal fire barriers?

Welcome! If you haven't started the process yet, I'm sure you're aware that planning is your first port of call. Can be trivially easy, crushingly difficult, and anything in between!

It's pretty strong stuff - I suppose it would work. Just curious about what the advantage is of having it under the window.