Temp

Normally you use wall "ties ties" of which there are many types. Some look like a bow tie made of wire. The kinks or twists in the middle forms a drip bead to stop any water tracking across the tie. There are noise reducing wall ties but I've no idea how effective they are at reducing noise transmission. They also look expensive.. https://www.ancon.co.uk/products/wall-ties-restraint-fixings/acoustic-wall-ties

+1 If under 3 sqm you could probably knock the whole porch down and rebuild it without need planning permission. I would just get on and do the clading. Take photos first and ideally annotate one set with dimensions so nobody can argue you've changed it in some other way such as making it a lot bigger. If a someone was to complain to the planners and they felt that planning permission was required they would first send you a letter. The letter will look scary and talk about enforcement action etc but dont panic as its intended to persuade you to engage with the planners. What you do is call up and ask what you need to do. Most likely they will say you need to make a retrospective Planning Application and they will wave it through. Sometimes they have to be seen to follow the due process when someone makes a complaint. Other times they just want the application fee. I recommend making up a test panel with a few slips and mortar and let it dry fully to be sure of a good match to the house. A slight difference in mortar colour can change the way the bricks look quite a bit. Do the neighbours have similar rendered porches or are theirs brick?

If your neighbour isn't disputing the location of the boundary i would get it marked in some way then find someone that can cut it back to the marks and reinstate the drainage. I suspect the neighbour might be guilty of causing a statutory nuisance by causing the damp. Unfortunately nobody will take action against him for you and you don't really want to be paying out for legal costs. I only mention it because it might focus his mind if he gets stroppy. You can tell him if he just let's you get on with it you won't have to take him to court for causing a statutory nuisance with all the legal costs that would cause him.

Google finds.. https://forum.ovoenergy.com/smart-meters-136/i-ve-been-told-i-can-t-get-a-smart-meter-fitted-due-to-metal-casing-around-my-electricity-meter-area-why-8985 I've been told I can't get a smart meter fitted due to metal casing around my electricity meter area - why?

Not 100% sure what this is about but.. Conservatories come under different building regs to other rooms. In general they can have more glass and less insulation provided an exterior grade door is retained between the house and conservatory. In addition any heating has to be seperately controlled to the main house. If someone has knocked through or removed the door in the past, or if this is part of your current plans, you may need to demonstrate the resulting new/larger room meets the regs as a whole. Last time I looked there were several calculations you could do to prove this. You start with the easier sums and if they show you dont meet the regs there are more complicated calculations you can do that take into account insulation elsewhere in your house. So the BCO could be saying that no application has been made for this in the past or that he doesn't think you have submitted enough information with the current application or something else along these lines. If you are knocking through into the conservatory as part of the extension and your Architect has been paid to do the Building Control Application drawings then he should do these calculations to insure compliance with Part L.

If the wall is over 11m long I think it will also need an expansion joint/gap. This is literally a narrow vertical cut in the wall bridged with telescopic wall ties.

Now I've seen the drawing.. The left hand wall on your drawing above is quite long. Long walls need buttressing which is normally provided by interior walls. So its probably the bit of wall on the other side of the door to the point you marked that the BCO is interested in. Is that where the SE added a wind post? The resolution isn't good enough to make out. This stuff is in Approved Document A around page 28 but takes some working out. Edit: Now I look again I see that probably is where he's put the wind post (marked RWP).

I think ours just has some sort of foam sheet in it but it's on the sheltered side of our house. I think a low modulus sealer is recommended.. https://www.sealantsonline.co.uk/ProductGrp/Dowsil-791-expansion-joint-silicone-sealant

My guess is the BCO was in a rush and just didn't have time to check if you actually had any lintels over 3m. That will be from his normal list of things to ask for. It's not uncommon for the most critical lintel to be designed by the SE and the same family of lintels be used for the other smaller windows (eg same depth and width just different length). But note its not always the longest lintel that is the most critical. I would ask the SE to provide calculations for the one that might need replacing and possibly recommend a family of lintels for the windows. Tell him BCO says he doesn't need calculation for lintels under 3m. The SE might decline and insist on doing load calculations for all of them because you are effectvely asking him to take on risk without doing sums he feels are needed. Not 100% sure what the "return less than 665mm for the store room" is but it sounds like it might be a pier/pillar or short length of wall perhaps between two windows or a window and a door. Theses are typically areas where the loads are concentrated. Eg it's got the ends of lintels or other beams resting on it. In some cases the load may be high in relation to the crush strength of lightweight blocks. The SE can do a calculation and tell you exusting blocks are ok or what density of blocks to use if its a new part of the build.

Sounds like an expansion gap. They are normally required in long walls over 11m.

I think most self build insurance policies cover accidental damage to neighbouring property. I guess they are thinking about damage to houses and basements not tunnels but perhaps the wording would cover tunnels as well?

Yes but.. This rule is to stop petrol from a car leaking into the house under a door between the two. The rule was amended years ago so that no step is required if the floor of the garage slopes away from the door. Perhaps ask the BCO if you could you put the step between store and car parts of the garage? That would appear to meet the regulations and keep the floor in the store the same height as the house. The floor of the store woukd need to be concrete so it doesnt allow fuel under itself.

+1 Should be ok. I recommend writing a letter to the builder just to document what you are doing and how the final cost will be split. The builder should bill you ex VAT and reclaim the VAT he pays the window company from HMRC himself.

Before WW2 Black was sometimes earth and Green was sometimes a phase and i think BT used red for earth?

I agree with others about trying to find the source. I suspect a roof or gutter issue but you say none of the upstairs rooms are affected? Is any of it below an upstairs window? Certainly looks like a water issue because the problem areas appear to form vertical bands in the photos. I've found Zinsser paint very good. Had lot of issues with paint coming off ceiling above a shower. Flaking and powdery patches. Zinsser worked a treat. I was lazy and didn't paint the whole ceiling and you can clearly see now where the zinsser ends as we have a little mould after that point. Will be doing the rest of the ceiling. I've used the Zinsser Bulls Eye 123 primer with their Perma White interior over the top. Think I would try the "Bulls Eye 1-2-3 Deep Tint Primer" on its own on some of your problem spots. See if that survives before doing larger areas.

Same compressive strength?

A standard accumulator needs good mains pressure but can boost the flow rate. It works by filling up slowly from the mains then delivering it rapidly to outlets. You end up with improved flow at about mains pressure I don't believe that type will work well for you because the mains pressure is on the low side. I think you need a system with a pump to boost pressure as well I'm not that familiar with the rules on pumped systems (I didn't think you can pump the mains directly?). See what others say. PS I assume you have checked all valves are fully open and any filters aren't blocked/scaled. Might also be worth checking what the water co is obliged to deliver. They are obliged to maintain 0.7 bar where the pipe comes onto your land but at what flow rate? PPS It could be your best bet is upgrading the supply pipe. Depends what the pressure is like in the road.

Have you got a structural ridge beam? What stops rafter spread pushing the lintel off the wall?

I believe you need house and garage on one Planning Grant for the garage to be zero rated. It might not be possible to ammend the existing Planning Grant.. https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Material_amendment_to_planning_permission

Think most can manage 80-100 mm bend rads.

I'm not aware of any planning rule that adversely affects L shape outbuildings specifically.

I had look but the nearest I could find is this - but its to do with Planning not Building Warrant.. https://www.sepa.org.uk/media/163472/water_assessment_and_drainage_assessment_guide.pdf But also found this written in 2001. Perhaps out of date? https://www.lawscot.org.uk/members/journal/issues/vol-46-issue-03/taking-the-lid-off/

We lived in a house in Belgium that had a solid first floor. Loved that so much we used Beam and Block for both ground and first floor when we did our self build I England. That required us to use blocks for the walls. No problems with a nice stone floor in the bathrooms as all rooms upstairs have UFH in screed just like the ground floor. I'm afraid I can't tell you the cost difference as we don't know but we love it.

Sorry, No you don't get the fee back.

Now looked at the other pages... Your Electric Account was in credit by £299.39 ex VAT Your Gas Account was in debit by £46.53 ex Vat. Together and after taking VAT into account they owed you £ 265.50 They made two payments to you of £74 totaling £148.00. Check your bank account to see if these arrived. They still owe you £141.93. Well that's my reading.