Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The brief to the architect was to keep everything standard and nothing expensive. Somehow a great big zinc roof that extends over the sides was put in, I had no idea it was so specialist and eye wateringly expensive (double price of tiled). We are through planning and QS and a contractor both suggested we get it changed to a tiled roof. *Bangs head

Presumably that means going back to planning and the structural engineer, architect etc etc? 

Gone someone say something good.

Posted

cor. sounds like your Architect made a big blunder there if they thought Zinc was standard and not expensive! we only had Zinc guttering and downpipes specified and knew that was going to be expensive but a whole darn roof!

 

I wonder if you could get away with a material amendment rather than another full planning application?

 

good luck! at least you're value engineering now and not after you've started building.

Posted (edited)


Architects love zinc. They must be trading in it. 

 

I started with zinc but we are now fitting a Catnic Urban metal standing seam roof. I got a quote for Greencoat but it was much dearer than Catnic. 
 

Can you not getting a change of material? Most of our warrant says blah blah material or equivalent. 

Edited by Kelvin
  • Like 1
Posted

Should get in with a material amendment..there probably is some relatively minor expense if it is a major material amendment like this I think but otherwise should be straightforward 

Posted
  On 13/12/2022 at 21:28, Kelvin said:

started with zinc but we are now fitting a Catnic Urban metal standing seam roof

Expand  

 

This makes most sense, should be a minor amendment. Looks similar and no architectural or structural changes necessary.

Posted

I agree with Iceverge.

I have done many a roof in sensitive locations, using steel, either grey coated, or aluzinc, and the planners have been happy that it looked like traditional zinc.

The magic words were 'wide pan, low profile'. I.e. Not crinkly.

I never used standing seam either because of the cost, and being difficult at joints and junctions. The screws are visible but a minor thing.

Also, if ever damaged, standing seam requires specialist repair, wich simply won't happen, and it gets patched up.

 

Does your design brief cover economical design? That would concentrate your architect's mind on getting this changed. Beware of him being prescious of the zinc, and not being very convincing with the plannners....I have had that and taken the discussion on myself.

Don't tell the planner it is about cost though. Sustainability....less material, easier maintenance and repair, longer life...whatever.

  • Like 2
Posted

We changed ours from zinc to plx. I challenge anyone to tell the difference unless its right in your face. If the colour and profile remain the same then who would know the difference, a planner? However if you were keen to keep them informed then I would think a non-material ammendment would be your best option.

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...