ProDave

You can do a timber stud insulated wall between house and garage, that's what we have. It just needs 2 layers of firestop plasterboard on the garage side. (as you also do on the garage ceiling)

That looks to me like it is set up as a recirculating hood, not an extracting hood (look outside to see if there is a vent outlet) If so it will just be blowing the warm moist air out at the top of the "chimney" (you will see vents on the side of it) If it is recirculating it should have charcoal filters on the fan intake if you remove the grilles.

@Roger440 What is the cost they are quoting you for a single phase supply? If that is reasonable, then would a good compromise be single phase for most of the time then fire up the genny for the few times you need to run a 3 phase load? What do you have that needs 3 phase?

I started fitting the battens from the bottom, making their own ladder as you went.

Every time you see floods predicted on the news you see sand bags etc by the thousand. I have yet to see a case where they do any good, and later you see the sand bagged houses pumping out the water. You would need the whole house tanked to swimming pool standard for the outcome to be otherwise. In the village I lived down south, there was one old cottage that regularly flooded when the river came up but not by very much. They had "flood hardened" it. The ground floor was quarry tiles on concrete with quarry tile skirting. The walls were sand cement rendered to about 1 metre up. No electrics were low down. Kitchen units were on legs with no kick boards. When a flood was predicted all small stuff went upstairs, the sofa and other large furniture went up on bricks and the owner wore wellies when downstairs. When the flood went, he just mopped out the ground floor and put the furniture back. Perhaps a similar robust floor covering and skirting etc might minimise damage next time?

That is a silly "solution" The problem we have at the moment, is wind farms etc build on the basis of a cost price and they bid that plus a profit. But they end up getting paid the gas price and making a much larger profit. Anyone can see this is bonkers. All we need is a system where the generators make a sensible profit and the price the consumer pays is fair. There is probably a good argument for nationalising the gas back stop generators and they can be stopped and started as required without the threat of the operators shutting them down for good if they don't have their cake and eat it.

Time for Scotland to have it's own pricing, and electricity exported over the border metered?

In my case it's the racking layer. Above the rafters is 100mm wood fibre, membrane, counter battens, battens and tiles.

I would say some vent holes at the lowest point, so if it does fill up underneath in a flood, the water can escape when it goes down, not remain and put pressure on the walls.

Mine came from a dealer "delivered" Their definition of "delivered" was rolled down the ramps off their truck. Good job I had my Landrover then. Sounds like you might want "delivered and sited" A front mounted tow ball would have made that a lot easier. P.S they don't have brakes, so mine stayed hitched to the Landy until the axle was jacked up onto blocks and levelled, otherwise it might have just rolled down into the burn.

Mine was on the roll. Most of my joists were at 400mm centres so a roll cut into 3 (cut it with a panel saw while still rolled up and bagged) each strip was a little too wide for the gap so it squashed in and stayed nicely. Before I started on the roof, I did a test strip, and left it open and un supported for 6 months. It did not fall out or slump. I used the 100mm thick, 2 layers of it. Measure length and cut to length on the ground then push it in at the top working down. Most of it was done on my own.

Something has to change, or those that telling us more renewable = cheaper prices needs to admit that under the present scheme, they are telling the public a pack of lies. It is the untruth we are being told that really irritates me.

You seem to be moving on with the mindset it was exceptional weather that caused the flooding and keeping FFL as it was. I would not. I would be looking for FFL to be half a metre higher and convert to a solid, not suspended floor so there is nowhere for water to fill up a ventilated under floor void. That would of course require roof off and building up existing walls that may have tipped it towards knock down and rebuild. I was reminded of this when away last week and we were in Stonehaven, and there were several houses all together up for sale. SWMBO asked why that was. I reminded her of Storm Babbet and those have probably all just been finished rebuilding after the flood and the owners want rid to some poor unsuspecting buyers who do not watch the news.

The whole "system" is rigged. We keep getting told if we have more renewable the price will come down. Not with the present pricing scheme it will not. And predictions are we will still be burning some gas for electricity in 50 years time, so that will still set the price unless the method of setting the price changes. Do you ever get the feeling we are being fed a whole pack of lies?

I fitted my insulation from underneath. I used Frametherm 35 which is a lot less nasty than some other forms of mineral wool insulation, and it is quite stiff, so cut a bit wider than the gap and it just pushed in and stays where you put it.

Is there a way you could get the house you want, by building a smaller one now to get planning, but designed in such a way you could add an extension later, i.e. almost immediately after you finish the main build? I know someone that once had 2 planning apps in at once, and the day before the committee meeting one was withdrawn. Having 2 applications at once confused the objectors and only one received objections, the one they withdrew, so the one that went to committee had no objections.

Lack of light to landing, fit a Sun Tube (they come under a whole load of different names) and a glass panel above the small bedroom door to let some borrowed light in. Then you can have the layout you want without the big landing just to get natural light.

To be clear, when you push the probe back in the water temperature is NOT rising rapidly. That sensor reads the temperature and uses that reading to control it when the ASHP is doing the heating. The water is already at whatever temperature it is, it is just without the probe in, it is not being read. So the rapid rise when you put the probe in is the readout just catching up, not the water heating rapidly. As you have a solar PV diverter the hot water will likely have been heated a lot hotter than what the ASHP does, just to use up surplus solar PV. It will stop doing that when the immersion heater thermostat says so. So just put the probe back and relax, everything is working normally.

It might be the tiles were delivered like that? (in which case they should have been rejected) I tiled my roof myself, and as soon as I started unpacking the pallets of tiles, it became aparent a LOT were damaged, often just with corners chipped off. So much so I notified the supplier and put them on notice they would be liable if there were insufficient due to the damages. In my case as it happened, I have a lot of valleys so as I unpacked them, the damaged ones got put on 2 piles, damaged on left, and damaged on right. By only using the ones that arrived damaged for the valley cuts and using the good ones elsewhere I had enough. But if my roof had no valleys I would have been claiming for replacements for the damaged tiles. If yours came like that perhaps the roofer did not bother as it would hold up the job?

I have a warm pitched roof, or more correctly a hybrid roof, with 100mm wood fibre board over the rafters and 200mm mineral wool (Frametherm 35) between the rafters, then an air tight layer then plasterboard. I swear by this method and it is infinitely better and easier to detail that any other method.

Invite them to come and clear up their mess off your property first, but if they don't, follow that advice.

You can see my point though? All those years ago I had a covenant saying no building without permission of XYZ council. I took that to mean if I gained planning through appeal, I would not have their permission, but if XYZ council granted planning I would. The wording of the covenant did not stipulate which department of XYZ council should grant permission under the covenant. We hear when cases go to court, it hinges on the exact wording of documents, not necessarily their intended meaning. So I would love to know how such a covenant would be treated by a court if it did not state which department of the council needed to give permission, and one department of the council had.

We once had a property with a covenant "no building to be erected without permission of XYZ council" I applied for and was granted PP by XYZ council and then building regs and building control sign off. Later when we sold the property, the buyers solicitor contended that we had not got permission from the correct department of XYZ council. It was solved by a cheap indemnity policy, but surely they should have been more specific if the covenant permission had to come from a particular department. I often wonder how such a case would end if they ever tried to enforce the covenant.

No, you should not see board lines like that. Was it tapered edge plasterboard? did he lay a scrim tape? Did he go over the joints first with a base coat before plastering the lot?

Does the passage between the dark brown fence and the wall lead anywhere? e.g to a rear access or steps up to the neighbours higher garden, or is it really a strip of dead space your neighbour is arguing over?