ProDave

Exact boundaries only become a "problem" when there is a dispute. As many others when I bought my plot, the hand drawn plan in the deeds was very poor and not definitive, so my solicitor went through a process of obtaining a "P16 report" where the land registry try to match the parcel of land with something on their maps, and came up with a pretty close match, so we then agreed to buy it on the basis we were buying what was enclosed by the current fences. But our is not build close the the boundaries so if there was ever a boundary dispute and we lost a small bit of garden it would not be a big issue.

A land registry map will rarely show enough detail to determine the boundary without some reference. That reference is usually the fences. If the fence is NOT on the boundary, then it will usually be shown on the plan as inside not at the edge, of your land.

In that case my "wet" towel will be pretty light.

I can see a forum wet towel competition coming soon. I am not sure I want to see that (might turn into a wish I could unsee that moment)

British Waterways morphed into the Canal & River Trust. What is their interest? Plumber and digger driver should not have issues. If I can install my own unit myself the professionals should not have a problem. But we do look forward to pictures with diggers and big holes in the ground (we are easily pleased) As long as it's approved to the relevant BS number I am sure building control will accept it.

That is very similar to the discussion I had about my static caravan and they backed down and removed the clause requiring it's removal on completion of the house.

Yes but a much more serious question. Has anyone found a way to make freshly washed towels fluffy, without the use of a tumble dryer? Getting them DRY is no issue but "sandpaper" is a description I get told of any towel that has not wasted spent time in the tumble dryer. EDIT: Jeremy beat my by 2 minutes.

Just to say I stopped the test after 2 days which confirmed it's clocking up 2KWh per day on the meter.

yours for the cost of postage if you want something "rare"

Yes. No hole for the water to get out. Screwy's have posted a replacement.....

Check your components before assembly.I didn't So I have done some basic plumbing to get some water on in the house. Except when I turned it on, no water came out, not a gurgle, not a drip. I start worrying my incoming pipe has a major problem. What I have connected is so simple it can't possibly not work. Can it? So I crack the nut on the input to the stopcock, yes there's water there. I crack the nut on the output of the stopcock, not a drop. Take the stopcock out for inspection. Spot the problem...

The issue is not how long can your tails be, but the DNO will only allow THEIR fuse to protect tails up to 3 metres long. So if you want longer, do as already suggested and fit a KMF with an 80A fuse in it.

It will be now as the EWI will have blocked the weep vents and I see no sign of any new vents being fitted.

I'll let you know when I try it. Planning 150mm long 6mm screws (because I have plenty) into the brick. got to first buy a longer 6mm SDS bit

I believe it's EON. It's a timber framed bungalow, but an old one when they only built with 100mm frames, and not much insulation in the frame, then a 50mm cavity then the blockwork. Adding the EPS will improve it but who know by how much. Who says it has to meet any particular target U value? surely just the fact it's improving it is the target?

Had an interesting one today. Had a call to go and do some electrical work in a bit of a hurry. The story is , the customers energy supplier is paying for external wall insulation, for free, on a standard bungalow. This was aparently the 4th time they had applied and much to their surprise they were accepted. So the bungalow is being clad in 80mm EPS (or is it XPS I can't tell the difference) and then being rendered. The reason for the panic call to me as an electrician, is they were simply going to cut the stuff around a couple of external 13A sockets which would have left them rendered in place in a recess and unservicable. so my job was disconnect them, extend the cable and leave just a cable to be threaded through a hole and then rendered, and to go back when it's all done to re fit them. Also had an outside light and a couple of PIR sensors, who know what concoction they would have dreamed up had I not removed those. The insulation is cut round the external oil fired boiler, and also cut round a stack pipe that's tight to the wall. Also where a fence panel joined the wall, they have taken the fence panel off but left the post that was screwed to the house. It looks like they will render around, this fence post then put the fence back!!!!! It will be interesting to see what the finished thing looks like and how much difference it makes.

Pictures. We like pictures.

I would just plant the hedge and buy mature plants so it is fairly well established quickly.

The video shows it all. Except in your case all the nuts will be very tight because they won't have been off for years so you will need a big adjustable spanner.

It was common to have a gate valve on the feed to a header tank, in the airing cupboard below perhaps. can you post a picture of your ballcock valve and we might suggest how to dismantle it, but don't try until you have turned the water off somehow.

If you have a header tank in the loft then that is a VENTED hot water system, not unvented. I suspect what has happened, is the cold water header tank will have been empty, so that will have been the first place the water went when restored as the ballcock will have been open. As you stated you ran the kitchen tap until the dirty water had gone, there was obviously a lot of mud etc in the pipes. So some of that will have gone and blocked the ballcock that feeds your header tank. You can usually dismantle them to clean the muck out (after you have turned the water off)

Okay test started. An initial indication, is that the "1000 pulses per KWH" light is flashing once every 45 seconds. So that will take 45,000 seconds to clock up 1KWh which is 750 minutes or 12.5 hours. So that would be 2KWh per day or an average of 83 watts continuous power, which is more like I would expect.

I don't have a PF meter and guessed that might be what's "wrong" hence my idea of a 24hr electricity meter test. The tank is full of clean water at the moment, having had no "input" yet so it's just blowing bubbles in clean water.

I have just today connected and comissioned the air blower on my Conder ASP6 treatment plant. According to the pump it's rated at "80W" so I am somewhat surprised and very disappointed when I measured the actual current it is drawing as 0.7 Amps, which at 240V is 168W. If that is true then that adds up to an astonishing 1471KWh per year or at £0.15 per unit, an annual running cost of £220. That is NOT what I expected. I guess the first thing I need to do is run it for exactly 24 hours, with nothing else whatsoever in use and see how many KWh the electricity meter actually clocks up. That will give a more true indication of the actual "cost" Anyway that's way to high so I want to look at other options, including replacing the pump with a lower power one, and an idea that has been discussed before of running the pump only part time.

When we got our water connected I had already run the water to the static 'van and installed the stopcock to feed off to the house, so the SW inspector checked all of that for depth etc and that's when he made me install the nrv's. He did say if all I had on site was a stand pipe right next to their boundary box, then that's all that would have been checked and nothing else ever would be.