Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Nickfromwales said:

If moisture was routinely buffered any further into the fabric of a domestic residence, that’s just too far and has not been addressed or controlled properly.

 

Seasonally, perhaps this is an acceptable swing, but day to day it should be the immediate room interior surfaces at most.

 

I dislike this approach, and am not afraid to say it!

 

Grab the heat and moisture, use it to better facilitate heat recovery, and get the MVHR in and running.

 

Tin hat time. 

 

 

Restricting moisture sorbing and release to the surface materials (Gypsum plaster boards) limits the positive benefits of stable indoor moisture levels that natural insulations can provide.  Not an issue with MVHR of course (unless there is a sustained power cut in winter with high occupancy) as this is artificially removed.

 

Personally, I'd rather not rely on a mechanical system to stay healthy indoors.  Horses for courses.  And I prefer my straw hat to tin foil 🙂 

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, sgt_woulds said:

Personally, I'd rather not rely on a mechanical system to stay healthy indoors.

I've done both, woodcrete ICF is a good hydrophilic material I believe, but good airtightness and MVHR to capture any ventilation heat losses.

  • Like 1
Posted

With iPSV you don't need a fan in the bathroom or kitchen, to maintain overall conditions.  You might want a small fan to assist with kitchen odours though.

 

We do have an extract fan in our kitchen, as an easy route for passive stack was not available. 

 

Building from scratch, these problems could all be mitgated at the design stage. 

Posted
On 20/02/2026 at 15:57, Nickfromwales said:

So no mechanical fans in kitchen / utility / bathrooms etc?:ph34r:

 

If it's all properly designed, there's no need for them, but BCO might ask for them to be installed. I have an old inline fan in a cupboard in the kitchen but not connected, another in the guest bathroom not connected and a small one in the ensuite that I've just put in at minimum fan speed because my wife was worried.....

Posted (edited)

One of the drawbacks I can see with iPSV is hot days and sustained heatwaves with little wind to drive ventilation.

 

Currently we 'sail' or house through heatwaves by closing off all ventilation and shading the south facing windows (curtains, but we are planning external shades when we replace the front windows). 

 

Our roof and walls contain lots of woodfibre so we have good decrement delay, and occupation is low during the day so CO2 and moisture levels are not an issue.  In the evening after the sun has set and the air temperature has dropped, we open the north facing windows and the skylight and purge ventilate the house - you can feel the cooler airflow and it is very refreshing.

 

However, after a couple of days of heat, the night time temperature difference is reduced (due to radient heat from the earth and buildings) so this option tails off and CO2 levels inevitably rise.  We then use portable fans to make life bearable.

 

I know they considered this issue with the Bedzed buildings and tried using ventilation cowls / wind catchers but I don't think it was very successful. 

 

It is pretty much a given that climate change will lead to more frequent and longer heatwaves so I'm considering building a solar chimney with soil pipe ventilation - I have to build a patio out the back anyway so it is just a little extra excavation.

 

The chimney might be an issue with building control, but sod 'em!  We'll stick it up and see if anone notices!  I have a couple of ideas on the design, and I'm considering buying the Handbook of Domestic Ventilation but I don't know if this is a good sourceof information or if there is better text elsewhere.  It is an expensive book to take a punt on...

Edited by sgt_woulds
missing words
Posted
4 hours ago, sgt_woulds said:

have to build a patio out the back anyway so it is just a little extra excavation.

If your patio/back garden is big enough, how about an earth tunnel?

 

I was quite keen on trying to incorporate one into our new build but the architect just went into tilt mode whenever I tried to bring the subject up.  Just wasn't on his radar so didn't exist in his mind.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Bancroft said:

how about an earth tunnel?

Aren't these a bit - yes they work great at bring in stable air temperatures, but can also bring all sorts of pathogens and bad stuff over time, so not the be all, end all solution? Plus you definitely need forced mechanical ventilation.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Bancroft said:

how about an earth tunnel?

That is something I looked at when designing my new build. I looked at the Rehau system which used silver plated ducting to kill off any bugs, but it was too expensive. That was sixteen years ago though, so things might have improved.

Posted
36 minutes ago, JohnMo said:

Aren't these a bit......

I've no idea because I have only heard of them in "wind in the willows".

I hope it's actually a plastic pipe with a riser and rain/mouse barrier.

If it's meant to prewarm the air then that won't work past November.

Posted

I just happen to be looking at some ground temperature data.

I am not so sure it is a good idea to bury air pipes in the ground, even at 1m depth, it is only from mid March to September that the ground is cooler than the air, and then only by a maximum of 2°C.

At the half metre it is about 1.5°C cooler.

I also suspect that the energy transfer efficiency is not too good.

 

image.thumb.png.79f596e55a8ed422fe2690828f3a3557.png

Posted

I looked at earth tunnels when we built but came to the same conclusion as @Gone West

 

Minimal energy gain with the drawbacks of mould growth in the pipe and high install costs. 

 

As usual sitting down with a calculator and a biro very quickly dispells incompletely though out ideas. Passive stack was another. 

 

There's only 3 practical options really.

 

1.Trickle vents and extractor fans if you don't care about indoor air quality, noise, thermal comfort or energy use. 

 

2. Humidity sensitive mechanical extract. Upgrade to humidity sensitive vents if possible. Good IAQ. Some energy loss.  Minimal maintenance costs but some cold  spots in the house. 

 

3. MVHR. Excellent IAQ, minimal energy loss, best thermal comfort, no cold spots or noise. Higher maintenance costs may not be offset by lower ventilation losses. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...