Jump to content

Max truss centers width for a slate roof.


epsilonGreedy

Recommended Posts

My roof trusses arrived last week and are ready to be fitted. Now a potential slater for the natural slate roof cover has commented that slates are a pain to fit when the gap between trusses is more than 450mm. The slater says the extra flex in the "lats" at 600mm centers causes bounce when nailing the slates into position and this bounce causes extra breakage.

 

Is the slater making a valid point?

 

I am no looking at four remedies:

  1. Buy an extra 10% of slates to cover the additional wastage. Not a preferred solution because apparently some cracked slates won't become apparent for a few months.
  2. Fit stronger lats, 50mm x 50mm has been suggested to reduce bounce across the 600mm centres.
  3. Buy a few extra trusses to get say 70% of the truss spacing down to 450mm. However because I have a hipped roof there is no simple way to reduce the centres where the prefab intermediate hip end trusses are sized to fit at 600mm centres.
  4. Go back to Plan A and fit Nulok to sidestep this whole issue with Nulok's its nailless design.

 

Hmm! This good weather won't last much longer.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, epsilonGreedy said:

Is the slater making a valid point?

Yes, my builder wanted 400mm centres and mentioned bounce (or break when stood on ?). My slates are fitted on hooks, not nails, looks great and no breakages (also easier to replace broken slates). Perhaps hooks and 50x50 batts.

Edited by joe90
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a 600 centres and 50x25 battens. Yes it can be a little bouncy but so far it isn't being a problem in the slightest.  But I am only an amateur with roofing!  

Edited by dnb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, nod said:

I can’t remember ever  seeing roof trusses at anything other than 600 centers 

 

 

The truss manufacturer knew I was having a slate roof cover and did not raise the option of 450mm centres. The boss visited onsite to confirm measurements and we had a long chat about self building hence there was time to discuss the 600mm / 450mm option, hence it must be a specialized choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, joe90 said:

Yes, my builder wanted 400mm centres and mentioned bounce (or break when stood on ?). My slates are fitted on hooks, not nails, looks great and no breakages (also easier to replace broken slates). Perhaps hooks and 50x50 batts.

 

My building moto is "when in doubt copy Joe90's build".

 

Do you remember the name of your slate hook system? While chatting about Nulok with my guy he conceded hook slate fixing is the norm in Brittany, it should be a robust option given the wild weather in Finistère and their > 45 degree roof pitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, epsilonGreedy said:

My building moto is "when in doubt copy Joe90's build".

 

You ol chammer you!!!, I found this on u tube, may be helpfull. One of my hates about slates is the difficulty replacing broken ones where tile are easy but not with hooks!!!!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Oz07 said:

25mm lath for 600 centres.

19mm lath for 400 centres.

 

Perhaps he's been on jobs with wrong thickness lath

 

 

My slater has clocked up 30 years in the building trade. I think he just wanted me to adopt some of the standards he has applied to his on recent self build with its slate roof. He is circumspect about most modern building techniques e.g. he is not happy about being persuaded to accept 50mm of flow screed thickness for his UFH ground floor slab. He reckons many dry ridges will fail before the life expectancy of the rest of the roof and he does not think breathable membranes are as breathable as claimed "the nice thing about old tar based felts is that the nail holes self sealed compared to these flimsy modern underlays where the nail holes open up as the wind tugs the membrane". 

 

He went on to state that he encounters many newish modern attic spaces with mould on the timbers because of insufficient ventilation. He recommended eave vents that reach up 600mm i.e. well over the insulation.  

Edited by epsilonGreedy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, joe90 said:

 

You ol chammer you!!!, I found this on u tube, may be helpfull. One of my hates about slates is the difficulty replacing broken ones where tile are easy but not with hooks!!!!

 

 


 

Interesting, but possibly the most boring voice over guy ever employed! 

Edited by Gav_P
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, joe90 said:

You ol chammer you!!!, I found this on u tube, may be helpfull. One of my hates about slates is the difficulty replacing broken ones where tile are easy but not with hooks!!!!

 

I am also keen on hook fixing.  It stops any rattle and makes sense to have the tail of the slate held down.  Even if the slate were to crack (which is less likely than with nails) it will not slide down off the roof on onto who or whatever is below.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Russell griffiths said:

How about using a sarking board. 

 

 

Hmm now there is a radical thought for England. Something to consider if there is likely to be a long delay before the slates can be fitted. A sarked roof with felt over is good for a few months I assume?

 

Trouble is I guess extra measures are required to make up for the loss of moisture egress via a breathable membrane?

 

My roof has a cold attic space BTW.

Edited by epsilonGreedy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, epsilonGreedy said:

He reckons many dry ridges will fail before the life expectancy of the rest of the roof


I wonder which part of the dry ridge he expects to fail?, stainless screws?, perhaps the plastic inserts!. I still think Mortor (stiff) on a timber (flexible) roof structure is asking fir failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Mr Punter said:

 

I am also keen on hook fixing.  It stops any rattle and makes sense to have the tail of the slate held down.

 

 

I am nearly convinced the only problem I have is with the final aesthetics. I remember observing, while touring around Brittany, that the exposed hooks are noticeable. I wonder if hooks would upset my local conservation area officer.

 

I think NUlok's hooks protrude less because the main fixing for each tile is groove in each of the special metal inserts.

 

21 minutes ago, Mr Punter said:

 

Even if the slate were to crack (which is less likely than with nails) it will not slide down off the roof on onto who or whatever is below.

 

 

Or in the case of @ToughButterCup's roof, a scaffolding board is scooped up by the wind and thrown onto the freshly laid slate roof.

Edited by epsilonGreedy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, epsilonGreedy said:

 

The truss manufacturer knew I was having a slate roof cover and did not raise the option of 450mm centres. The boss visited onsite to confirm measurements and we had a long chat about self building hence there was time to discuss the 600mm / 450mm option, hence it must be a specialized choice.

I can see where he’s coming from

Nailing skates onto 450 centers would be much easier 

But if he was working for a building contractor he would just arrive and the roof would be ready for him with 600 centers 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, epsilonGreedy said:

 

Hmm now there is a radical thought for England. Something to consider if there is likely to be a long delay before the slates can be fitted. A sarked roof with felt over is good for a few months I assume?

 

Trouble is I guess extra measures are required to make up for the loss of moisture egress via a breathable membrane?

 

My roof has a cold attic space BTW.


yep it’s fine. 
 

just done a small sarked roof today - boards are 95x20mm rough sawn tanalised and laid with a 3mm gap between the boards. You need counter battens though unless he’s nailing onto the boards at which point I think they need to be 25mm ..?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, PeterW said:


yep it’s fine. 
 

just done a small sarked roof today - boards are 95x20mm rough sawn tanalised and laid with a 3mm gap between the boards. You need counter battens though unless he’s nailing onto the boards at which point I think they need to be 25mm ..?

 

 

Thanks, does the 3mm gap allow moisture to pass the sarking and then up through a breathable underlay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the sarking is wet I lay it without gaps as when the roofing membrane goes on the boards Start to dry out and  shrink And you then have your gaps. 
My local builders merchants keep the sarking outside and as it’s the west coast of Scotland the sarking is always wet ! 
it’s quite alarming how much shrinking you can get. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...