Oz07

Wouldn't of thought so myself but could be wrong never used permeble. I have seen a driveway done with it and it looked terrible after a few years all loose stones everywhere like an old knackered carpark. It could of been down to a bad job or lots of dry turning though?

As if there wasn't enough regulation around building houses. I doubt the big builders have to comply with this. No doubt they will have some scene where they do it with 1 house type then every other build of that type is automatically approved.

Are land registry ok with doing this if the shareholder is 100% the original owner? I know people transfer their buy to lets to ltd companies but I'm sure I was advised once they still don't like to split a title if the new owner is a ltd co. with original owner as shareholder. It doesn't sound right to me maybe I heard wrong.

What a joke you've got the photos but they wont accept because the location data is not right?! What are you supposed to do if you're a luddite hold a card up next to the detail when taking a photo and detail the location? No wonder everything's knackered. @nod were you on new or old regs?

are you married? Sell plot to partner?

You won't get 2 mortgages on same title I'd of thought. Maybe if you contact self build lenders before you remortgage they could offer it in one loan? After all they do lend for purchase of plots

No need to worry mastic man will do his thing. If it wasn't foamed he'd only squash in a sausage of that foam stuff they carry anyway.

Xmas. You must have a good local authority. I don't think it matters when you split. I thought land registry resisted splitting titles when it was going to be the same owner on both? I would split at the same time as mortgage self build if possible then one lot of legal fee's.

Yeh you'd hope so wouldn't you. Although if it needs more credits then be happy to pay. I suppose its a bit of a nothing burger, I can claim the self build exemption. Trouble is might need a new eco survey and you also have to pay the councils legal fees for any undertaking on the bng exemption.

Erection of 4 bed 2 storey detached dwelling. I suppose that's good news however I would still be hoping the planners play ball with me. It's basically a 9x11m box at the moment however has a 1x2m inset where the front door is and a similar size area taken off one of the back corners for some reason, also a pair of bay windows on the front. I'd want to square that back corner up so its basically just the box, possibly keep the inset at front door, possibly make that area a porch. There is a condition that reads no further additions or extensions to the dwelling shall be constructed without prior permission. Funnily enough I think these used to be worded that they were removing your permitted development rights. Have they watered these conditions down due to people appealing? Would an attached garage count as an addition? I am limited to flat roof and 2.5m height if I go down permitted development route but wouldn't nessecarily be a deal breaker.

Compo and cuts to get it reasonable close to the pipe, within an inch or so. Pack the rest with insulation and stainless steel wire pads

In my mind, that's exactly one of the things I would expect them to tell me. A fixings schedule. What's the point in employing them otherwise.

Yeh I'd heard councils differ in how much they accept through non mat. You're right though be doubtful I'd get it. Now the BIG question. Have to pay for more bng credits on a new application? Surely not!?

Kept mine for a year then binned off. Way too heavy. I've got the 360 now. Its better performing but the gas is more expensive than normal. You can find deals on eBay.

When I looked into it BCO was the most important one. Planners just seem to use guidance and plans can look like they comply (as in the case I was interested in) but even if you have correct width and gradient access along with turning circle, the distance from a hydrant point can still kill it. So planners will pass without ever speaking to fire service. It is up to BCO to be happy it complies before they sign the place or design off. I forget what section it's in but think its specifically mentioned in the building regs doc. I had a look at the thread I posted but it wasn't quoted in there.

Yes the only problem with this is presumably they have a relationship with the vendor or their agent. I think it's better for me to find out if the credits apply to the land or specific permission first. I need to know if it's going to cost me extra 10-20k in credits

annoyingly the council doesn't offer any pre app service either to ask the question

I must be the only idiot here who put in a non-mat ammendment for 100mm. This is when drawings allowed for 100mm cavs and I decided to build with 150's. I didn't want some clever clogs to come out with a tape and cause me pain afterwards.

You'd have to osb the lot I reckon for decent protection. Probably could source some second hand boards from an old hoarding job. I think the finish would be ok but you'd still need some kind of sealer on it surely? @nod what time of year was your floor done? We've troweled up a garage floor before the next day morning but it was like Jan/Feb, this was after pouring at around 9am too. I don't think you'd get away with it in summer

I was looking at a plot with this problem a year or so ago. Ended up leaving it. The vendor couldn't convince me that I wouldn't end up in a situation whereby the house would be built (at worst) or plot purchased and the BCO would refuse to sign off on the design because of this. You can use alternatives such as sprinklers or mist systems but when I looked into this it is still only up to a max distance from the highway. I think the ideal route would have been to take the plans (or in your case some indicative sketches) and have a meeting with Building Control and potentially the local fire service and see if you can get some agreement before purchasing. In my case it was falling on deaf ears with the vendor, their plot is still for sale today, surprise surprise.

Think I've finally found the next plot which is suitable for us. Viewed it yesterday, good location. The planning on it is ok ish but as always seems to be the case I would like to change. The planning is for 1 1/2 storey with no garage. I'd like to change to full 2 storey with adjacent double garage. The planning has been passed quite recently and the off site biodiversity credits have been purchased by the current vendor. The main question is if I change the planning with a full new application, can I still use these purchased off site credits for the new permission? Are the credits site specific or planning application specific? The other option I may have is to see if I can persuade the planners to accept the changes on a material (or is it non-material) amendment. The new dwelling would have pretty much the same footprint, in the same location with the same number of bedrooms so maybe there's a slim chance. The ridge and eaves height would end up a lot higher so that may be the killer. Neighbouring houses are all full 2 storey so i'm not sure why its been planned this way. I'll probably have more questions but this is pretty crucial for me to know first. I've done a web search and used AI and it seems imply the credits could be used on a new application. However i'd be keen to hear from anyone with more knowledge or first hand experience. With the credits for this having cost in the 10's of thousands I don't want to be paying twice. I suppose I can tentatively ask the vendor for some paperwork about the credits. The planning portal has a confirmation letter saying that the habitat bank would be prepared to sell them the credits but no further confirmations. Obviously i'm not keen to show my hand at this stage that I would want to change the approved planning. Thanks

Why would they do it like this just sounds like aggro. I can understand the other way round waiting till roof is on and pour a slab/screed that is pretty common

I think it's all cyclical. We've been so long in the time when land prices are so high. I remember early 2010 you could haggle for prices with plots on open market and there was a lot of meat left on the bone for whoever built it out. Nowadays builders seem to be almost buying the work with the plots for sale on the open market. All that risk and capital tied up for 20 maybe 25% with all the time it takes and regulations to comply with. God forbid there was ever an accident with all this principle contractor and designer nonsense. I'm sure it will go back the other way at some point.

Channel it with a saw and breaker it out or deeper than 6" from top?

Joe90 had a simple wide cavity with solid eps fill. Off the denby wood design or whatever it was called