-
Posts
14418 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
29
Everything posted by Pocster
-
Top of the class for me .
Pocster replied to Pocster's topic in Energy Efficient & Sustainable Design Concepts
BOOM ! 108 š -
As I argue with the council over an epc on another property I decided to check mine on my build . Itās a laugh isnāt it . With zero extra work inbetween ā¦. initially a D ( wanted low for the MCs ASHP grant ) . Then a B for bco sign off Now an A ! - after correcting errors - waiting for exact score . Near passive standard without the passive costs !
-
Me sir me ! what didnāt I do ⦠Put up the timber frame CU wiring plastering install the glazing ummmmm , thatās it really . took a bit of time - but me nutters are big
-
No . You count each one and put a marker pen on the dimple so you donāt count it again . I want photographic proof youāve done this then Iāll tell you what to do .
-
Youās da bro šš»
-
Thatās bollocks . But count the dimples anyway
-
Just count the dimples on both sides . Most dimples is down side . Easy bro šš»
-
I have threatened that , and of course would do that . Council didnāt respond to it . I need to keep skin in the game a little longer .
-
Absolutely. I checked and as I need a letter from my epc assessor confirming 0.14 U on combined roofs ( not the uninsulated one ) ; heāll charge me for that and Iāll bill the council . The chance of this going to tribunal is almost zero - but like most council BS ; they play poker holding a pair of twoās .
-
Having fun here So council go down document L route ; though it canāt be applied retrospectively. They then do health and safety risk ⦠Weāve moved from the loft room - evidence from epc assessor that the combined U is 0.14 I.e less than there wanted minimum of 0.16. So thatās good news . Focus has now shifted to the kitchen pitched roof which is deemed uninsulated . This is an easier problem . Worst case it could be insulated internally as there is ceiling height . Again they quote document L - which they canāt enforce . Then they try health and safety as roof not 0.16 or better . Their case officer viewed the house 3 months ago and did pick on other issues in the kitchen ( incorrectly ! ) , so he was observant . But missed category 1 and 2 h &s issues ??? Either incompetent or there arenāt any issues . The council have clearly overstepped their authority. They have zero evidence. Told them letās go to tribunal.
-
Take responsibility then
-
You made one ? Or you want one ??
-
-
-
You are a tease
-
Lots of wine , lots of shots , lots of luck can narrow that time š
-
I couldnāt get my appointed menial removed from the case but his (itās) supervisor now checks everything . Just waiting on epcās assessors report which of course I have to pay for . I do see a few future tricks here .
-
Because they canāt enforce part L theyāve stepped back a bit and are referencing https://www.cieh.org/media/3762/cieh-excess-cold-enforcement-guidance.pdf Iāve got a card to play as my epc assessor will put in writing that the entire loft room meets an averaged U rating of 0.14 I.e exceeding their āwantā of 0.16
-
Yes āyetā is the word for sure . But evidence suggests Iām in the right area . My faith is low but my confidence is high . Supposedly rain tomorrow
-
Only just noticed I created this April 1st - but itās no joke !
-
I was going to do it last year ; decided Iād do it later - then summer ended ā¦. Difficult to isolate leak when it rains I.e impossible
-
Chat told me to repaint it again , so Iāll do that tomorrow as canāt do any harm
-
Well ! 6 hours later I canāt tell if itās leaking !!! There was still some dampness before I did the test . Took photos then . Compared to now canāt see any difference. Though different lighting at different times of day isnāt helpful . So we wait for āproperā rain now ā¦
