Jump to content

Distribution chamber vs inspection chamber


Roz

Recommended Posts

I think the main difference is that an inspection chamber is basically a hole to look at the pipe going in and out of the chamber 

a distribution chamber will have one inlet AND an umber of outlet connections --usually 4 for the soakaway perforated hoses

so its fitted where the main grey water pipe meets the soakway field 

this is my understanding of it  

 

Edited by scottishjohn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between the septic tank and soakaway is usually a sample chamber,  one pipe enters, thre is usually a small drop and another pipe exits. the idea being SEPA / EA or whoever can drop a container in and take a sample of your effluent

 

Here is the first one I found doing a quick search. https://www.wplinternational.com/optional-extra/wpl-sample-chamber/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was what I found when looking, which just seemed expensive when compared to the inspection chambers!

https://www.drainagesuperstore.co.uk/product/underground-sampling-and-distribution-system-chamber-110mm.html

 

But then found this..

 

https://www.drainagesuperstore.co.uk/product/polylok-standard-4-hole-distribution-chamber-with-flat-cover.html

 

and i don't understand why the difference in price

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ProDave said:

Between the septic tank and soakaway is usually a sample chamber,  one pipe enters, thre is usually a small drop and another pipe exits. the idea being SEPA / EA or whoever can drop a container in and take a sample of your effluent

 

Here is the first one I found doing a quick search. https://www.wplinternational.com/optional-extra/wpl-sample-chamber/

 

 

how goes the 50mm pipe problem dave 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Roz said:

This was what I found when looking, which just seemed expensive when compared to the inspection chambers!

https://www.drainagesuperstore.co.uk/product/underground-sampling-and-distribution-system-chamber-110mm.html

 

But then found this..

 

https://www.drainagesuperstore.co.uk/product/polylok-standard-4-hole-distribution-chamber-with-flat-cover.html

 

and i don't understand why the difference in price

It's the difference between a Trabant and a Rolls Royce. They both do the same thing, but the quality, and the price.

 

The cheap one does not look very deep to me, I am not sure it would have worked for us.  The treatment plant outlet was 700mm down and then another 100mm ore more step for the sample chamber, you will be looking at about a metre down.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, ProDave said:

It's the difference between a Trabant and a Rolls Royce. They both do the same thing, but the quality, and the price.

 

The cheap one does not look very deep to me, I am not sure it would have worked for us.  The treatment plant outlet was 700mm down and then another 100mm ore more step for the sample chamber, you will be looking at about a metre down.

I think ours is about that depth too. I might just ask the builder to sort out the distribution chamber from the merchant! 

Is non-woven geotextile the right option also by the way? It's more expensive than woven so wanted to check before I committed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I'm now at this stage but I have a 32mm MDPE feed to the sampling chamber as we have a pumped outlet. My thinking is just drill a hole in a normal inspection chamber sidewall to locate the MDPE and provide a easy to access sample point then use normal T connectors to branch the 110mm pipe out across the distribution field. 

 

Can anyone see an issue with this? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, bissoejosh said:

I'm now at this stage but I have a 32mm MDPE feed to the sampling chamber as we have a pumped outlet. My thinking is just drill a hole in a normal inspection chamber sidewall to locate the MDPE and provide a easy to access sample point then use normal T connectors to branch the 110mm pipe out across the distribution field. 

 

Can anyone see an issue with this? 

If you have a pumped system, the holding tank with the pump is the sample point, or in our previous pumped system the sample point was in between the septic tank and the pumping chamber.

 

I have never seen a sample point installed in this location with a pumped system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ProDave said:

If you have a pumped system, the holding tank with the pump is the sample point, or in our previous pumped system the sample point was in between the septic tank and the pumping chamber.

 

I have never seen a sample point installed in this location with a pumped system.

That makes sense, I need to take a look in the treatment plant and see . I still need to drop the 32mm into 110mm for the drainage field though and this could double as an inspection point if needed. That is unless a fitting that converts 32mm MDPE to 110mm exists which I doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

I am designing my drainage. I have a sewage treatment plant, like this thread states needs an inspection chamber with a small drop to catch a sample of water. Looking at the warrant handbook it needs to be a drop of 150mm. I don't have much height to work with and if the building inspection definitely needs this drop I will possibly have to pump the water higher just for it to fall again over the 150mm drop. This seems a little mental as I'm sure you could find a way of extracting a sample of water easy enough from a straight flowing inspection chamber with no drop. Im going to phone the warrant department on Monday, but I was wondering if anyone has gotten away with not having this 150mm drop after the sewage treatment or septic tank?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, our Graf One2Clean has a built in sampling chamber and the treatment plant wasn’t too dear so simplified the install with no extra cost. 

Edited by Kelvin
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, gavztheouch said:

don't have much height to work with

That's a good point. This will lower all subsequent drain runs and the soaway or drainage field, increasing cost and risk. We need another solution.....the buildhub detail.

I'm guessing that the intention is that an inspector can take a flowing sample as it emerges.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dpmiller said:

the Solido airlifts well above the outlet, into the sampling pot, and this then overflows to the outlet

Interesting. I will have to read the bumph again because I am not understanding how it works, or why they have not used 3 chambers. It seems to be a single chamber, ie more like a cess tank than a digester, but with air bubbles. 

Then the outlet is by  a pump, not gravity, the 'airlift' of the title.

There is only a 20mm drop in level from in to out.

The sampling pot does not have the 150mm suggested but is effectively pumping a sample out.

But if it works...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, saveasteading said:

Did it have that 150mm drop in it though? They seem to want that and it is still a 150mm loss of height.

Ah, not sure if it was 150mm, can’t remember and the diagrams don’t show the drop. 🤷‍♂️ but it worked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, saveasteading said:

It seems to be a single chamber

Correct. It's an SBR- Sequencing Batch Reactor. It goes through a run of aeration and settling cycles before a final settle and pump out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, joe90 said:

but it worked.

If the bco accepts it and it works, then that may conclude the process. It will probably never be tested by the authorities.
I will try reading the instruction manual again, to see if I can work out how it works, and if it is a real or imagined advantage.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dpmiller said:

It goes through a run of aeration and settling cycles before a final settle and pump out

That sounds complicated and the effluent would go untreated if there was any problem, whereas the 3 chamber types work to a high % of optimum without power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...