mjc55 Posted Friday at 12:50 Posted Friday at 12:50 We are building a "Pod" on our site which eventually will become a home office and store. It is around 22 sq. m. internally and more than a metre from the boundary. Now we will be living in this whilst we build the main house and I would estimate that this will be 6 months or more of habitation. For my part I don't think it requires building regs approval but would like to hear others views on this. I have just received structural drawing from the SE and he has questioned the BR lack. Not that he thinks that it definitely needs it but that he is unsure. The reasons for doing this are twofold really I guess. It will save us rental costs while we build the house and we are using all the same techniques and materials (flat/green roof, single storey, Ecobrick construction) on the Pod as we will the house. This will allow us to a) test the ecobrick construction and b) reduce rental costs as we will be living on site. Any thoughts welcome.
Nickfromwales Posted Friday at 13:10 Posted Friday at 13:10 Eco bricks seem an odd choice. Not so great reviews in term of longevity? Do you mean ecobrix (woodcrete ICF)? 1
kandgmitchell Posted Friday at 13:34 Posted Friday at 13:34 Looking at Regulation 3 the BRegs apply to "the erection or extension of a building". Regulation 2 defines a building as "any permanent or temporary building but not any other type of structure or erection". I think you would have to agree that what is proposed is a building - not say a communications mast (which would be a structure for instance) or the Angel of the North which would be an erection. Schedule 2 exempts certain types of "building" from the regulations and Class 6 covers small detached buildings. In your case it's over 1 metre from the boundary so the type of materials used aren't an issue and it's under 30m2. However, to be exempt it also should not contain any sleeping accommodation. That's the issue, your proposal will, so it cannot be an exempt building. If it's not exempt and it's a building then the BRegs apply. However....... if you are only going to use it for six months, it could take the LA that long to discover what the situation is and to react to it, if at all. Not suggesting you ignore the law of course but just pointing out the reality of modern life when LA resources are stretched. Once you stop sleeping in it then it's exempt.
Russell griffiths Posted Friday at 13:36 Posted Friday at 13:36 22m is too small, I live in a cabin we have on site, it’s 6m x7m i would not want it much smaller, you could go 7x5 any smaller and I think it would be a painful experience.
mjc55 Posted Friday at 16:22 Author Posted Friday at 16:22 2 hours ago, Russell griffiths said: 22m is too small, I live in a cabin we have on site, it’s 6m x7m i would not want it much smaller, you could go 7x5 any smaller and I think it would be a painful experience. Understand that but we have lived for long periods (2 months) in our mobile home, which is significantly smaller. We are not naieve enough to think that it won't be an "interesting" experience though.
Temp Posted Friday at 20:02 Posted Friday at 20:02 (edited) If its got a bedroom I believe Building Control Approval is required. https://www.labc.co.uk/news/does-my-new-outbuilding-need-building-regulations-approval Quote To be exempt from the regulations they must have the features listed below and they must not contain any sleeping accommodation (no beds in sheds). continues.. Note Mobile homes and caravans don't need Building Control Approval but this doesn't sound like it will meet the rules for mobile homes? Edited Friday at 20:08 by Temp
Roger440 Posted Friday at 21:54 Posted Friday at 21:54 As far as i can see it needs BR However, if its for months, rather than years, id just crack on, unless you have particuarly nosey neighbours? Even if it could to the point of enforcement, 6 months would be long since past. But why not just get a mobile home, thus avoiding such issues?
G and J Posted yesterday at 05:44 Posted yesterday at 05:44 Isn’t it just like putting a tent up and camping in your garden for a bit? If you get on with your neighbours and you ensure they know it’s not permanent living accommodation and you won’t be moving peeps in there permanently then I suspect you are highly unlikely to have a problem. Start applying for building regs so it could be permanently lived in would be more worrying for the neighbours I’d have thought. Love the idea of it bringing a hands on prototype for the house.
ProDave Posted yesterday at 08:14 Posted yesterday at 08:14 Can you post details of this ecobricks you are planning to use? While I can see you want a practice piece for the main build, if only you were to make this cabin out of an insulated timber structure, you could make it comply with the "caravan" rules and hence not need building regs. Remember a "caravan" does not need to be on wheels to meet the legal definition of a caravan.
mjc55 Posted yesterday at 08:36 Author Posted yesterday at 08:36 22 minutes ago, ProDave said: Can you post details of this ecobricks you are planning to use? While I can see you want a practice piece for the main build, if only you were to make this cabin out of an insulated timber structure, you could make it comply with the "caravan" rules and hence not need building regs. Remember a "caravan" does not need to be on wheels to meet the legal definition of a caravan. https://ecobrix.co.uk/
mjc55 Posted yesterday at 08:38 Author Posted yesterday at 08:38 2 hours ago, G and J said: Isn’t it just like putting a tent up and camping in your garden for a bit? If you get on with your neighbours and you ensure they know it’s not permanent living accommodation and you won’t be moving peeps in there permanently then I suspect you are highly unlikely to have a problem. Start applying for building regs so it could be permanently lived in would be more worrying for the neighbours I’d have thought. Love the idea of it bringing a hands on prototype for the house. This is my view to be honest. I know there is a chance that we could have some issues with the LA living there but am prepared to deal with that should it come up.
ProDave Posted yesterday at 08:43 Posted yesterday at 08:43 4 minutes ago, mjc55 said: This is my view to be honest. I know there is a chance that we could have some issues with the LA living there but am prepared to deal with that should it come up. The LA will almost certainly demand council tax from you.
mjc55 Posted yesterday at 08:49 Author Posted yesterday at 08:49 5 minutes ago, ProDave said: The LA will almost certainly demand council tax from you. Yes, I expect that and have no issue with it. We are going to be living there and want all the normal services.
saveasteading Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago I would make it of timber stud, and looking as much like a hired cabin as possible, and raised on blocks. nobody will give it a second look, and is clearly temporary.
mjc55 Posted 20 hours ago Author Posted 20 hours ago The method of construction isn’t up for debate here, the point of constructing it in this way (as I said in the first post) is to use the same construction materials and methods as the main house. I understand that to be exempt it shouldn’t contain sleeping accommodation - it doesn't, it's overall purpose is office/storage. We may (or may not!) sleep in it for a bit. Schedule 2/ class 6 of the BR states Quote 1. A detached single storey building, having a floor area which does not exceed 30m2, which contains no sleeping accommodation and is a building— (a)no point of which is less than one metre from the boundary of its curtilage; or (b)which is constructed substantially of non-combustible material. To my eye that means it doesn’t require BR approval.
Temp Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago Even "without" sleeping accommodation things like the electrics and possibly the plumbing (?) are notifiable. Typically your electrician will notify LABC about the work he does on it. When the BCO visits to check on your house best tell him the pod just being used as a site office and hide the airbeds 🙂
ETC Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago But make it safe and your BCO will probably not give you too much hassle.
-rick- Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago If you are building using the same construction techniques as the main building to practice, why not go through BC as practice of those elements? BC might point out something that causes you to avoid a costly issue for the main build. If its concern over making detailled BC plans, why not just do it as Building Notice? (seperate from main build)
mjc55 Posted 15 hours ago Author Posted 15 hours ago 2 hours ago, Temp said: Even "without" sleeping accommodation things like the electrics and possibly the plumbing (?) are notifiable. Typically your electrician will notify LABC about the work he does on it. When the BCO visits to check on your house best tell him the pod just being used as a site office and hide the airbeds 🙂 As long as the electrics are done by a suitably qualified person they don't require BR.
saveasteading Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Have you checked your planning permission? It is quite common for it to state that permitted development rights are withdrawn (ie you should have made it part of the application).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now