Alan Ambrose Posted Wednesday at 18:03 Share Posted Wednesday at 18:03 That's it really. I was hoping to use a phased approach where we sorted the structural and fabric stuff (say to watertight stage) first. And leave the MVHR calcs etc to later. Also, what is there to say about, for example, Part P except use a P-qualified electrician, Part Q except use off-the-shelf doors & windows etc? What have other people done? Does anyone have a good approach to this with a definitive list of BC docs - it all seems a bit vague to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russell griffiths Posted Wednesday at 19:40 Share Posted Wednesday at 19:40 It was getting to summer and I was keen to start, so I asked our local bc if I could do a phased building regs submission. they said yes. so I submitted the drawings for piling and ringbeam design from the structural engineer, while we were getting the piles in we asked for a list of stuff bc wanted. very little in fact, sap assessment was the one they really wanted, the rest was just loads of drawings forwarded from other designers. structural design for roof timbers. structural design for all lintels and steel work structural design for block n beam. we had the house up to wall plate level before we had submitted everything. we also had a couple of conditions relating to cladding choices and stone, I told them that I could start building because these conditions didn’t effect the construction of the house it was only the outside facade, we got these signed off a few weeks before we placed the orders for the materials. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Ambrose Posted Wednesday at 20:00 Author Share Posted Wednesday at 20:00 Thanks. Was that LA or private? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russell griffiths Posted Wednesday at 21:26 Share Posted Wednesday at 21:26 1 hour ago, Alan Ambrose said: Thanks. Was that LA or private? LA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjc55 Posted Thursday at 00:56 Share Posted Thursday at 00:56 Interesting. I might try this approach with our local BC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevilDamo Posted Thursday at 08:02 Share Posted Thursday at 08:02 @Russell griffiths So were the LABC happy to issue a Conditional Approval which meant everything else could follow later? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russell griffiths Posted Thursday at 09:01 Share Posted Thursday at 09:01 57 minutes ago, DevilDamo said: @Russell griffiths So were the LABC happy to issue a Conditional Approval which meant everything else could follow later? I’m not sure I fully understand, do you mean on the outstanding conditions ? this was back in 2018 so it’s a bit vague now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saveasteading Posted Thursday at 09:34 Share Posted Thursday at 09:34 8 hours ago, mjc55 said: Interesting. I might try this approach I'd venture that this depends on the bco confidence in you and your designers. In any case, there is a risk of non- optimal design if you don't have a complete design strategy at the outset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevilDamo Posted Thursday at 13:00 Share Posted Thursday at 13:00 3 hours ago, Russell griffiths said: I’m not sure I fully understand, do you mean on the outstanding conditions ? this was back in 2018 so it’s a bit vague now. LABC’s have up to 2 months to make a decision on an application. If you only submit some of the information, did they then issue a conditional approval so the rest can be submitted later, i.e. after 2 months? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now