Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

They look like they took the piss - can hardly complain tbh.  Size and positioning - what did they expect.  Muppets.

Posted

+1

 

They certainly look very out of place.  Problem is the developer managed to sell the houses.

Posted

Whilst I have had problems with planners myself you still can’t break the rules, so yes, they should be demolished as an example. Muppets!

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, joe90 said:

Whilst I have had problems with planners myself you still can’t break the rules, so yes, they should be demolished as an example. Muppets!

You can bend them a bit . My tape measure frequently stretches . But as others have said don’t take the wee wee 

Edited by pocster
Posted
11 hours ago, Temp said:

They certainly look very out of place.  Problem is the developer managed to sell the houses.


But as they are not complete presumably they are still owned by the developer? If they’ve exchanged contacts but not completed the new owners could sue the developer too. 

Posted

Looks like the developer may have sold them some sort of land, design and build deal.

  • Sad 1
Posted

I assume the developer ltd co will go skint but I wonder where the house owners will stand?  I would think the directors may face some personal liability.  Did the architect have any say?  Very odd that this was such a mammoth blunder.  The conveyancing solicitor will normally want to see that all planning conditions and building regulations have been complied with before completion of the purchase.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...