Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just thought I would check something. 

On another group I’m a member of somebody is suggesting that they are going to build an extension with sips then a membrane and then cement boards screwed directly onto the sips, no battens no air gap or cavity. 

 

Now I’m sure that is totally wrong but they reckon it’s the correct spec. 

 

Who's the lunatic me or them. 

Posted (edited)

Them in my opinion. I have SIPS and I will be having a 50mm air gap then my renderboards. 

 

Albeit I am now very interested to follow this, only person I know with something attached directly to a kit is @ProDave with his wood fibre cladding which is rendered. Dunno know if thats nearly equivalent? 

 

following with interest. 

Edited by SuperJohnG
Posted
Just now, Russell griffiths said:

Pro daves place is timber frame not sips. 

I know however his wood fibre panels (can't remeber what they are exactly) I think are directly attached? I might be making it up. 

 

It would be nearly the same thing. 

Posted

I saw a stick built extension being built.  They nailed a mesh to the external OSB after the Tyvek breather membrane, then rendered it with concrete.

Seemed an odd way to do things to me.

Posted
33 minutes ago, Russell griffiths said:

I just thought I would check something. 

On another group I’m a member of somebody is suggesting that they are going to build an extension with sips then a membrane and then cement boards screwed directly onto the sips, no battens no air gap or cavity. 

 

Now I’m sure that is totally wrong but they reckon it’s the correct spec. 

 

Who's the lunatic me or them. 

 

They're wrong but you're still a lunatic! ?

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Russell griffiths said:

I just thought I would check something. 

On another group I’m a member of somebody is suggesting that they are going to build an extension with sips then a membrane and then cement boards screwed directly onto the sips, no battens no air gap or cavity. 

 

Now I’m sure that is totally wrong but they reckon it’s the correct spec. 

 

Who's the lunatic me or them. 

 

It might work if they had magnesium oxide based SIPS. image.png.639590572dbfdabc59daba276514ae92.png

Posted

The above link references a BBA cert that appears to be no longer valid. The replacement certificate now includes the vent cavity behind the cladding system. Check MIs and  3rd party certificates for exact requirement, accepted good practice is that render should not be applied direct to TF or insulation on TF.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...