LnP

Did you consider helping them do the RAMS?

Some thoughts on the cost of safety … - If you think safety’s expensive, try having an accident (quote from process safety guru Trevor Kletz). - There’s often a benefit to set beside the cost. Think about how we used to do work at height off ladders and now all the handy equipment like portable scaffolds which not only make it safer, but also easier to do a better job. - We don’t have any choice about regulatory compliance, like implementing the CDM roles, but when it comes to choosing how we work, we’re only required to apply solutions which are reasonably practicable. Regarding working with trades, I’m early enough in my self build not to have first hand experience, but I’m hoping that a bit of hand holding with writing RAMS will overcome any reluctance. I have had experience of this in an industrial setting and have found most contractors are happy to cooperate.

Reinforcing some of the comments made already ... in my opinion, CDM 2015 is good legislation and not about blame. The whole point of CDM is being organised and clear about who's doing what. That's a good thing for any project and will help it run not only safely but also well. I also agree with comments made already that the usefulness of a RAMS in inversely proportional to its length. There's good advice and templates on the HSE web site about all this.

Is it the three fins (labeled F4) which prevent the twisting, or the seven pieces of angle (labeled B8)? What are the B8s fixed to?

CVC included the humidity sensor in my quote for the Brink, recognising that you do need one. It’s not integral with the unit though, not that that matters.

I’m close to placing an order and agree with all of this. I’m planning fit and forget. Keep it simple. Additionally, from my research: The Brink doesn’t have a humidity sensor built in as standard. You do need one and need to specify one to be fitted in the return duct just in front of the unit. The Zehnder has humidity control as standard. I’m not sure I’ve fully got my head around this, but I think the Zehnder has a more advanced algorithm if you have active cooling (via your heat pump or multi splits). It’s something to do with how it looks at outside and inside temperatures and controls the bypass.

You’re not only being a nice fellow, you’re complying with the requirements of CDM to create a Health & Safety File. In principle, this is one of the jobs of the CDM Principal Designer. Do you have one of those or are you doing it yourself? I included the requirement to provide H&S File information in the scope package I sent out to get quotes for demolition and groundworks and got feedback I was scaring people off.

If you were persuaded by Steve Koonin's views on climate change, but are open to the possibility there might be another side to the argument, you should watch Dave Bourlace's analysis of Koonin's points in his Just Have a Think podcast.

I can confirm that the advice I got from Gus was helpful, and the more so because he does it for a living. I'm sure the administrators are well able to spot when people are on the forum motivated by commercial interest rather than collaboration.

Makes sense. So is this the type of pipe you'd use, insulated MLCP? Would it be reasonable to assume you could get this type of pipe all the way to the fan coil without having to use any fittings, e.g. elbows to get round tight corners? Otherwise how would you insulate the fittings? Would you need to make the insulation air tight so you couldn't get moist air behind the insulation?

Fair point and thanks for your helpful interpretation.

Yes, I get it. Thanks for your alert. Choosing the foundations is one of the most important decisions in the project. The best one can hope for is to become an "intelligent customer". That's why I'm talking to people and asking questions on here.

There are two ways for me to understand your question. If it's a straight one, the straight answer is, no I don't do it for a day job/business and yes I'm a genuine self builder, whatever that is. But since I opened my post by explaining why I'm asking my question, the straight answer should already have been clear. So I'm wondering if your question was rhetorical and intended to demean and denigrate, which would be a pity. Thanks for your comment. Useful to get your opinion..

@JohnMo One insulated form work system provider I spoke to, said that NHBC and other warranty providers are not comfortable with having the masonry outer leaf sitting on a different foundation than the timber frame. They're concerned about differential movement. They could supply their system with a separate outer ring beam for the masonry, but recommended a toe off the raft similar to the Build Lite one I shared, for an easier ride past BCOs and warranty providers. One such local builder I spoke to came by with a machine with a large (1.5 m long?) augur and drilled some holes to see what kind of ground conditions I have. He was polite about my interest in insulated raft, but was of the opinion traditional foundations would be a doddle. I'm aware that there are those on here who say that insulated raft is cheaper, when you account for not needing screed, can fix the UFH pipes to the rebar etc. And I've heard it from insulated raft suppliers. I'm getting quotes both ways so will soon find out how it is in my case. Maybe insulated raft is best suited when you don't have the masonry outer leaf to worry about.

@-rick- Thanks for your comment. Just checking, did you see the whole image? For some reason, after I uploaded it, I only see the whole image if I click on it and open it. Here it is uploaded a different way. Does that answer your question? They have a toe on the raft which the bricks sit on, but with a course of Marmox blocks.