sansserif Posted yesterday at 14:05 Posted yesterday at 14:05 Hi all Wondering if anyone has any thoughts re: exterior wall insulation for my timber frame build. I'm shooting for an energy efficient build, but not chasing perfection by trying to hit passiv standards. I'd like to hit a sweet spot between price and performance. It looks like the "standard" exterior wall build-up from TF firms is 140mm studs + PIR to hit a decent U-value. But I'm wondering wondering if I'm missing a trick by not considering other insulation options? In particular, it would be great to have something that's a more organic material, lower VOC etc... Anyone have any advice? What's worked well for you all?
saveasteading Posted yesterday at 14:34 Posted yesterday at 14:34 24 minutes ago, sansserif said: any advice before any further thoughts could you advise on the roof verge detail? ie if you built 150mm or so out from the walls, does that fly past gutters and roof covering? similarly at the bottom, are there any obstructions such as manholes? And what distance is the nearest wall to a boundary. roughly if it over 2m, otherwise exactly in case it affects fire regs or any access you have.
sansserif Posted yesterday at 14:49 Author Posted yesterday at 14:49 The designs have an allowance for a ~300mm exterior wall thickness, excluding rain screen and plasterboard etc. Would be great to not need the full 300mm though. Design has a gable roof with a that overhangs about 50mm over the gable end. Distance to nearest boundary is 0.8m, and around 1.8m to the nearest building. No (known) nearby obstructions!
Mr Punter Posted yesterday at 15:41 Posted yesterday at 15:41 1 hour ago, sansserif said: In particular, it would be great to have something that's a more organic material, lower VOC etc... Insulation tends to be mineral wool or PIR. What is the proposed "rain screen"?
sansserif Posted yesterday at 15:58 Author Posted yesterday at 15:58 Rain screen would be brick (ground floor) and render (above)
Mr Punter Posted yesterday at 17:03 Posted yesterday at 17:03 You could fully fill with 140mm pir between studs and line internally with 50mm pir, held on with 38 x 50 battens to create a service cavity. You could put the 50mm on the outside but you will need different wall ties and another layer of breather membrane etc. You will need about 30mm cavity to the brickwork. If the timber frame co quote for the insulation it saves a lot off faff and mess on site.
Roundtuit Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Typically I think 140mm studs are filled with 120mm PIR due manufacturing tolerances, then we lined with another 40mm. I'm sure there are other rockwool/cellulose options you could look at with 300mm to play with. A 50mm cavity between frame and outer skin is required if you have masonry I believe. Mixing insulation will probably need some sort of condensation risk doing to avoid a dew-point in the wrong place.
G and J Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Ummm, the title confused me. At first I thought you were talking about insulation outboard of the frame/OSB. But I think you are looking at insulation between the studs of the frame and inboard of that. I think the 120mm PIR in a 140mm stud is about an air gap next to a reflective coating. So better insulation overall than full fill PIR. I am biased. I hate PIR with a passion. Used it under our floor a bit and regretted it. Should’ve made sure I had enough space for polystyrene only. We used mineral wool in our frame and another layer inside. I may be kidding myself but I now believe it’s a nicer job to do and nicer to live in. The only place PIR looks good is on a spreadsheet. 1
Iceverge Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 300mm external wall is really really tight to meet insulation regs. Brick Cavity Osb 140mm studs Plasterboard Skim Comes to about 290-325mm by my calculations. Can you stretch the wall thickness to 400mm?
Roundtuit Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 1 hour ago, G and J said: I think the 120mm PIR in a 140mm stud is about an air gap next to a reflective coating. So better insulation overall than full fill PIR. There's a +5mm tolerance on the PIR boards, so I wouldn't attempt full fill.
G and J Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 10 hours ago, Roundtuit said: There's a +5mm tolerance on the PIR boards, so I wouldn't attempt full fill. That’s true. When I laid the 120mm layer of polystyrene for our floor it snuck together beautifully tight and flat. The polystyrene has some spring in it so it could be cut to an interference fit and shoe horned in, lovely. The PIR in the other hand, was a bitch. Really nasty dust in the cutting, and however hard I tried still tiny gaps between the boards and to add insult to injury it sat there showing off how different thickness each board was. PIR. Just say NO! lol 1
sansserif Posted 7 hours ago Author Posted 7 hours ago 14 hours ago, G and J said: We used mineral wool in our frame and another layer inside. I may be kidding myself but I now believe it’s a nicer job to do and nicer to live in. The only place PIR looks good is on a spreadsheet. Why did you end up going with mineral wool out of curiosity? What makes you think it's nicer? I'm trying to understand how to make a decision on this. The TF companies steer heavily towards PIR, but my impression is that it's because it's easiest for *them*. 13 hours ago, Iceverge said: 300mm external wall is really really tight to meet insulation regs. Brick Cavity Osb 140mm studs Plasterboard Skim Comes to about 290-325mm by my calculations. Can you stretch the wall thickness to 400mm? Sorry, I wasn't clear. 300mm is the thickness allowance for just the osb+studs+service batten. Complete allowances: - Brick walls: 500mm for everything (brick + cavity + OSB + studs + plasterboard + skim) - Rendered walls: 350mm for everything (render + OSB + studs + plasterboard + skim)
ProDave Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Go got 195 studs then you can get 2 goof layers of Frametherm 35 type mineral wool between studs. Less nasty to work with than other types of mineral wool and is stiff enough to just push in and stay put when cut a little over size. If that does not get the U value you need over board the inside with PIR, no need to cut sheets to fit, butt the edges together and tape them then 25mm battens for service void.
JohnMo Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago PIR is great insulation value in theory, but theory and practice are not generally the same thing. Cutting and then foaming to get a good fit between studs is a pain to do well, if you don't do it well, the practical U value suffers. Mineral wool is forgiving you can cut oversize and it can be squished into place, cut it undersize you can add more. Mineral wool is easy to do well. Use some thing like Frametherm 32 or Rockwool Flexi. Add PIR to inside face in full sheets if you need to after.
-rick- Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Mineral wall has better sound insulation too so leads to a quieter house compared to PIR.
G and J Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, sansserif said: Why did you end up going with mineral wool out of curiosity? What makes you think it's nicer? 1 hour ago, -rick- said: Mineral wall has better sound insulation too so leads to a quieter house compared to PIR. Absolutely this drove us, (we had a previous room in roof (done by others) and the result was not great) and then we found it really easy to work with. Used the frame therm batts as others have described.
Alan Ambrose Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Posi-joists with blown in cellulose or wood fibre? This is easy to do - insulation installed in a couple of days. The problem is finding a reliable & professional installer. Unfortunately, we didn't .
Nickfromwales Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 13 minutes ago, Alan Ambrose said: Posi-joists with blown in cellulose or wood fibre? This is easy to do - insulation installed in a couple of days. The problem is finding a reliable & professional installer. Unfortunately, we didn't . Gordon Lewis is tha’ man. If anyone wants his number, ping me a PM.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now