Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I can't see why not.  It may be a fair bit more expensive and although it is self compacting, it will not necessarily be level.  I would get a decent concrete contractor and use standard concrete.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JohnMo said:

Possibly, but you need to go to your structural engineer to ensure it is of a suitable structural strength.

I have asked if we can use scc and they have said no but, not given a reason. AFAIK the scc is made to the required strength(in our case C25/30) but has added platiciser to improve flow, I don't think it affects strength but, I'm certainly no expert, just reading up on the Internet concrete sites for info and so far that's what I've understood.

Posted
44 minutes ago, Russell griffiths said:

Have you looked into the availability 

when I thought about it briefly it wasn’t available locally so that stopped that idea. 

Yes, we have a local company that can supply it and, its not much more than standard. A standard mix with crew comes in around £500 more, not much so we will use that if it is the best option.

Posted
49 minutes ago, lizzieuk1 said:

and they have said no

So you can't use it then, you can ask the reason, but doesn't really change anything.

 

What the fascination of SCC?

Posted
2 hours ago, JohnMo said:

So you can't use it then, you can ask the reason, but doesn't really change anything.

 

What the fascination of SCC?

I've asked the question of why, my initial thought is they're worried that the eps profiles might suffer damage from the pressure of a more liquid flow. We can mitigate with shuttering if that is the only reason. I can't find any other real reason why it wouldn't be suitable, seems it has the same inherent strength as standard mix.

No fascination just a desirability to do as much of the build as we can and, this allows us to manage the pour etc, instead of needing a full crew to lay it. 

Posted
3 hours ago, carlos21 said:

whats self compacting concrete?

It's a mix that has added plasticiser, usually with a 10mm and below aggregate,  it flows more freely than a standard mix into mesh etc and doesnt leave air pockets. It doesn't require vibrating or power floating as compacts itself to a fairly level finish. May need a bull float to get the final finish but nothing more.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, lizzieuk1 said:

It's a mix that has added plasticiser, usually with a 10mm and below aggregate,  it flows more freely than a standard mix into mesh etc and doesnt leave air pockets. It doesn't require vibrating or power floating as compacts itself to a fairly level finish. May need a bull float to get the final finish but nothing more.

 

You dont float it they just use a dapple bar all over then spray some sealer on it to stop the water on top evaporating. It certainly takes a lot of labour out of the process. Can also flow quite far with a diy shute, no pump needed in a lot of cases. 

Posted
13 hours ago, lizzieuk1 said:

have asked if we can use scc and they have said no but, not given a reason.

It's because this is a made up term.

Your contractor wants an easy life and isn't skilled at floating concrete, and doesn't  know that it's difficult and a real skill.

 

You must do what your SE says or otherwise agrees to.

 

The big danger here is that this contactor wants a plasticised mix thinking that will magically settle to dead level and compact itself.

My concern is their competence and then they'll add more water to make it even sloppier. The concrete won't be level, will be reduces strength and crack a lot.

Posted

There's no easy life with concrete and it takes skill to get it right. 

 

As much as plastering a wall in my view. 

 

Can you access good contractors for it, it's a real mess when it goes wrong as @Gone West can attest to? 

 

 

 

Posted
15 hours ago, lizzieuk1 said:

No fascination just a desirability to do as much of the build as we can and, this allows us to manage the pour etc, instead of needing a full crew to lay it. 

 

Concreting is one of the least forgiving trades on site.  For a house slab it is not worth the risk if you are a novice.  Spend some time finding a decent gang to do this.

Posted
16 hours ago, lizzieuk1 said:

No fascination just a desirability to do as much of the build as we can and, this allows us to manage the pour etc, instead of needing a full crew to lay it. 

Of all the places to have a go, this isn’t one imho. If this goes wrong, it’ll be spectacular.

 

Having any pour is manageable, but if you take charge then you accept full responsibility and liability, and can’t look to someone else to redo it at their cost if they feck it up.

 

I doubt the cost saving vs risk makes any sense here whatsoever.

Posted
1 hour ago, Oz07 said:

Why was yours cut up again?

Twist the knife, why don't you 😀. I videoed the pour, and saw the concrete was going off before it was laid and there were voids forming.  We had the slab tested for voids and several were found, so they took core samples and condemed it. All because they wanted to save money by not having to use a pump. So much easier the second time. Fortunately it didn't cost us a penny, but we did lose a couple of weeks.

 

P9160009.thumb.JPG.419bec4f7120519de5c873f9df5278b6.JPG

Posted

.

1 hour ago, Nickfromwales said:

us to manage the pour etc,

Manage? You mean you get some labourers and control them? But they're telling you to get this magic concrete?

 

 

For diy you could deliberately lay the concrete 25mm or so low. Then get a professional to screed later.

but beware, level control is a skill in itself.

 

Is there reinforcement?

Posted

For the cost of letting a company get on with it, there isn't much money to save by DIY, a lot of risk of fuc*ing up and getting an utter mess that isn't level, isn't flat etc.

 

The other thing is the effort needed, self leveling or otherwise, to think to can do it yourself is a dream, it's a team effort, controlling people that haven't done many times before - life is too short.

17 hours ago, lizzieuk1 said:

worried that the eps profiles might suffer damage from the pressure of a more liquid flow. We can mitigate with shuttering if that is the only reason. I can't find any other real reason why it wouldn't be suitable, seems it has the same inherent strength as standard mix.

No fascination just a desirability to do as much of the build as we can and, this allows us to manage the pour etc, instead of needing a full crew to lay it. 

Couple of points here

If the EPS is that fragile, the EPS design is not correct, if you need shuttering the EPS design isn't correct.

 

You have already stated your no expert, so not sure your experience or lack of, is an added value here.

 

Let the experts do the job, they are cheap for experts, build the walls yourself and save real money.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, saveasteading said:

But they're telling you to get this magic concrete?

I'm against the 'magic' stuff btw, and I've seen enough concrete pours go tits up to know it's not a job for the feint-hearted or uninitiated.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...