Jump to content

Minimum Toilet Soil Pipe Diameter


MortarThePoint

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, Conor said:

Wouldn't go less than the standard 110mm. Many toilets have 90mm pan connectors but you do t see 90mm soil pipes.

 

I know it's not ideal, but I need to work out a smaller size if I can. I see in Part H the paragraph below. Am I to understand from that it's OK to have a 75mm waste pipe from an <=80mm outlet toilet:

 

image.png.fc42c5a69c2284e662d927db111039c4.png

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/442889/BR_PDF_AD_H_2015.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would also avoid going smaller. 

 

I think the next standard size down from 110mm is 82mm but I would only use if no alternative. I'd also keep the 82mm section as simple and short as possible. Make sure it can be rodded. 

 

Perhaps if you explain the situation we can think of a better solution?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MortarThePoint said:

Am I to understand from that it's OK to have a 75mm waste pipe from an <=80mm outlet toilet:

1.28 is referring to the vertical stack, not the connection to the WC.

 

The part between the WC and the stack is the 'branch connection'. So the rule at 1.15 applies and for an 80mm outlet toilet you either need a minimum 80mm or 75mm pipe. But, as Temp says, in practice you're limited by what's on the market. And I too would stick to 110mm - unblocking drains isn't my idea of fun.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Temp said:

Perhaps if you explain the situation we can think of a better solution?

 

8 hours ago, Mr Punter said:

Why do you want smaller?

 

I want to send the pipe through a couple of truss bottom chords (222mm) and the truss designer has said 115mm hole too large but 80mm would be Ok 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MortarThePoint said:

 

 

I want to send the pipe through a couple of truss bottom chords (222mm) and the truss designer has said 115mm hole too large but 80mm would be Ok 

Tell the truss designers to design in a steel reinforcement plate. 

222mm deep 750 long with a 110mm hole in them, glued and bolted both sides. 

 

He probably thinks you just just want to blast a big hole in his bottom cord, everything is doable as long as you then don’t nit pick his reinforcement design, by then saying the metal is too expensive. 

 

Do a sketch of your proposal and send send it over to them. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Russell griffiths said:

Tell the truss designers to design in a steel reinforcement plate. 

222mm deep 750 long with a 110mm hole in them, glued and bolted both sides. 

+1 to that with steel you can reduce the bottom cord to 6mm thick provided the load is spread back to the rest of the beam correctly and the whole lot is fixed to the structure properly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 24/08/2023 at 13:40, Temp said:

+2

 

I've seen it done with simple angle irons bolted top and bottom but best get it designed.  From google images...

 

2x10 HR Floor Joist Hole Repair Kit For Reinforcing Joist Or Truss Holes,  Route Utilities Right Through Floor Joists | stickhealthcare.co.ukJoist Repair Hole Reinforcer - 2x10 – Nolan Structural ProductsI-Joist Hole Support - IHS | Simpson Strong-Tie

 

One of those (the middle one I think) can be shipped from the US now. The one on the right is just for i-Joists.

Looks to be the way to achieve a bigger pipe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MortarThePoint said:

 

One of those (the middle one I think) can be shipped from the US now. The one on the right is just for i-Joists.

Looks to be the way to achieve a bigger pipe.

But you still need it to go via the truss designer, none of us know what your trusses are holding up. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 23/08/2023 at 18:07, MortarThePoint said:

What is the minimum diameter pipe that can be used for a toilet waste without a macerator?

Extracts from BS EN 12056 - 2:2000

 

For a WC the pipe diameter hinges on the outlet size.. which kind of makes sense..

 

image.thumb.png.1e5131ae3e74ffb964f069142d859baf.png

 

image.thumb.png.8d23d97be3a2b736a8953d1116bc2bdc.png

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 24/08/2023 at 06:07, MortarThePoint said:

I want to send the pipe through a couple of truss bottom chords (222mm) and the truss designer has said 115mm hole too large but 80mm would be Ok

Can you bridle around the area like you would do a stairwell, now you don't need to hole the bottom truss chords?  Maybe you need to double up the bottom chords or make the trusses if Engineered with a thicker flange or if standard trusses make these out of a thicker (not deeper) timber. That may make the problem go away and give you much more play vertically and horizontally when you actually install the WC.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...