Jump to content

new wiring, all sockets tripping charging a phone !?


Recommended Posts

Not quite what you want.  If you set up your top CU as that picture I copied from the linked website, you just need an additional 2 prong bit of busbar

 

A bit of this 

 

Picture 2 of 5

You could buy a length and cut it down, but any electircian worth his salt will have odd bits of it lurking somwhere.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah yeah, got that. I meant to join the top cu and the bottom one.

At the moment he has the live from the armour going into the main switch and "daisy chained" I guess you could call it straight down to the 

Main switch in the bottom cu (see pic).

What I think you are saying is to use the 2 prong busbar to join then main switch in the top to the rcb next to to it. But... From that rcb (or was it mcb) do you then run a cable down to the lower cu so can do away with that "daisy chain" set up out of the top cu's main switch to the bottom cu main switch.

He's coming back tomorrow arvo so gunna be an interesting chat.

Thanks again. Sorry for all the questions. Must be annoying but I do appreciate the shared knowledge here.

PXL_20230511_141312526~2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You shouldn’t have copper on show at the terminals.

 

Is it worth glanding the Swa into a metal enclosure via some din rail terminals, transition to tails coming out straight into a pair of Henley blocks, then take 2 sets of tails from the Henley blocks to each db

 

assume the Swa at the other end is in a kmf fuse switch or similar as the cutout is more than 3 meters away?

 

that way every main switch only has one set of conductors in it and can be safely torqued to the correct setting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, connick159 said:

Ah yeah, got that. I meant to join the top cu and the bottom one.

At the moment he has the live from the armour going into the main switch and "daisy chained" I guess you could call it straight down to the 

Main switch in the bottom cu (see pic).

What I think you are saying is to use the 2 prong busbar to join then main switch in the top to the rcb next to to it. But... From that rcb (or was it mcb) do you then run a cable down to the lower cu so can do away with that "daisy chain" set up out of the top cu's main switch to the bottom cu main switch.

He's coming back tomorrow arvo so gunna be an interesting chat.

Thanks again. Sorry for all the questions. Must be annoying but I do appreciate the shared knowledge here.

PXL_20230511_141312526~2.jpg

Yes trying to get away from that abomination.

 

When the top CU main switch is put back where it should be there will just be one L and N feed in to the top of it from the SWA feed.

 

The N link down to the bottom CU will connect to the very top right high integrity N busbar.

 

The L link down to the bottom CU will be fed from the MCB right next to the main switch. The input to the bottom of that MCB will be  jumpered to the main switch with the short 2 section busbar.  the original L cable coming out of it, which was supplied with the CU and splits in two to feed the two RCD's will also go into the bottom left terminal of the main switch with that short busbar. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, TonyT said:

There's also the issue that MCBs tend not to discriminate with MCBs generally it's a bad idea to feed an Consumer Unit  from an MCB in another Consumer Unit

Cartridge fuse holder?  

 

Picture 1 of 7

 

Not sure you can get more than 32A though?

 

Type C or D MCB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Hager 701 can do 100amps but it’s wider than a mcb so would upset the ways in the CU.

 

The main switch can only take 35mm2 max  so doubling up is against the MI.

 

From a cost saving point of view I think a metal enclosure with din rail terminals, Swa glanded into one side and tails coming out via an appropriate gland to a pair of Henley blocks- this then feeding both boards is the easiest way of making the installation compliant. 
 

then put rcbo for every circuit 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aren't those pics of the dual rail CUs just the same as what I have had Frankensteined together? 

I.e. 2 din rails that need L and N transferred from 1 to the next?

I know they are two separate cu enclosures but would then logical connection not be the same as the dual row in the link before?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update: he's not back till Sunday so while main fuse was out a swapped things around. Took out some mcbs and re did the way the RCDs were connected based on advice here. (Just top CU at this stage.)

I put the lighting and socket circuits on the RCD as well as oven and hob. Put main fuse back in then turned it all on.

Sockets and lighting both work without any trips like before. Result! There was a neutral being crossed from what I could see so once each RCD was on separate N bars prob resolved (I think)

Will leave it there but thanks for all the help. Next challenge is having the WTF conversation on Sunday. New bloke coming for a look on Tuesday.

Will give an update then for anyone interested.

Cheers 

Edited by connick159
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done mate!

 

If you know he is busy at certain times ask him to come then, if he says can’t say don’t worry a guy at work can help..

 

give him a little out to make the conversation easier if you want or not!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, connick159 said:

Update: he's not back till Sunday so while main fuse was out a swapped things around. Took out some mcbs and re did the way the RCDs were connected based on advice here. (Just top CU at this stage.)

I put the lighting and socket circuits on the RCD as well as oven and hob. Put main fuse back in then turned it all on.

Sockets and lighting both work without any trips like before. Result! There was a neutral being crossed from what I could see so once each RCD was on separate N bars prob resolved (I think)

Will leave it there but thanks for all the help. Next challenge is having the WTF conversation on Sunday. New bloke coming for a look on Tuesday.

Will give an update then for anyone interested.

Cheers 

The fact your "electrician" could not figure that out shows his lack of competence.  So progress at last.

 

Quite probably all you have to solve now is getting a proper feed to the bottom CU without that over crowded mess in the main switch, allocating the circuits properly and testing them properly as you go, and getting some form of RCD protection to the bottom board.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ProDave said:

 

Quite probably all you have to solve now is getting a proper feed to the bottom CU without that over crowded mess in the main switch...

Yeah, thinking of splitting the armoured via one of those junction boxes (Henley block) I think they are also called. One.eqch for the N and L feeds and then sending one to top CU and then other to bottom CU.

Then the rest as you say sorting out the config of circuits in the top CU and RCD (or RCCB) in the bottom.

Thanks again all.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you’re going to do splits etc with a Henley then put a 100A isolator in as well and terminate the SWA at that - will mean you can isolate the boards and also make it a bit safer to work on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PeterW said:

If you’re going to do splits etc with a Henley then put a 100A isolator in as well and terminate the SWA at that - will mean you can isolate the boards and also make it a bit safer to work on

There should be one at the other end of the Swa 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, connick159 said:

Yeah, thinking of splitting the armoured via one of those junction boxes (Henley block) I think they are also called. One.eqch for the N and L feeds and then sending one to top CU and then other to bottom CU.

Then the rest as you say sorting out the config of circuits in the top CU and RCD (or RCCB) in the bottom.

Thanks again all.

Remember the armour cable needs to be glanded into a metal box.

 

the single insulated cables of the armour can’t leave the box/cu. Only double insulated such as meter tails can do this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, TonyT said:

There should be one at the other end of the Swa 


agree however he’s relying on splitting the boxes and 2 isolators in the CU’s, and tbh for the £20 for a 100A metal clad isolator it is a bit of a no brainer - can also protect the split on the tails too.

 

Personally I would rip the lot and put a double decker board in and start again … 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/05/2023 at 20:01, TonyT said:

There's also the issue that MCBs tend not to discriminate with MCBs generally it's a bad idea to feed an Consumer Unit  from an MCB in another Consumer Unit

Probably at least 70% of houses that have a shed/ garage CU have this arrangement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the requirements for surge protectors? Mine do not have any but I've seen them on Hager website and now unsure if they are required by regs? If so, and each cu gets separate feeds as per the Henley block suggestions, would I need 1 in each cu?

Edited by connick159
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all,

Just updating. New sparks came in today. Ripped it out and started again.

Also added a new isolation switch and SPD on the feed into the armoured cable near the meter coming in.

Back tomorrow to finish off. Thanks again for all the advice. Been a £1100 lesson but I appreciate all the feedback from you all.

Cheers.

PXL_20230515_141713231.jpg

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's looking better.  So he opted for a new CU rather than reconfigure what was there?  

 

Neat job.  Do i take it all the circuits so far have tested okay or has he found any faults?

 

Look forward to the finished photos.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ProDave said:

That's looking better.  So he opted for a new CU rather than reconfigure what was there?  

 

Neat job.  Do i take it all the circuits so far have tested okay or has he found any faults?

 

Look forward to the finished photos.

 

They went and got new gear and started fresh.

A lot of the day was spent ripping out, reading the notes and labels from other guy but also doing work on the incoming feed. I wasn't there except to let them in but I think, apart from some preliminary testing earlier today, most of their testing is in for tomorrow. But he did say that there are a lot of junction boxes been used up in the attic/ceiling which they thought unnecessary. Some of which still seem to need completing so unlikely he'll be able to sign everything off by cob tomorrow.

Edited by connick159
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, connick159 said:

Hi all,

Just updating. New sparks came in today. Ripped it out and started again.

Also added a new isolation switch and SPD on the feed into the armoured cable near the meter coming in.

Back tomorrow to finish off. Thanks again for all the advice. Been a £1100 lesson but I appreciate all the feedback from you all.

Cheers.

PXL_20230515_141713231.jpg

This guy knows what he is doing and takes pride in his work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...