Jump to content

Stud wall spacing options & ply faced studs?


ruggers

Recommended Posts

I'm just calculating how much timber is required for non load bearing stud walls with 2.4m ceilings and wanted to know, what are the horizontal spacings between the vertical studs. 400 or 600mm? I'm probably going to use 4x2" timbers unless 3x2" is enough. 
 

Whats the spacing for any horizontal noggins required, every 600 or every 1200mm?

 

First first floor I have to screw some form of plywood or OSB onto one side of the stud walls for lateral support to the building if this affect the requirement for any noggins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to clarify. 

600mm is the centre to centre of the studs NOT the gap between them. 

Imagine putting a sheet of plasterboard up that is 1200wide if your gaps were 600 the plasterboard would not reach the next stud. 

 

But also look at plywood sizes, this is usually 8 foot by 4 foot, so that throws you out as well. 

Get your materials and do a layout on the floor to see if you need to jiggle stud spacing. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Russell griffiths said:

Just to clarify. 

600mm is the centre to centre of the studs NOT the gap between them. 

Imagine putting a sheet of plasterboard up that is 1200wide if your gaps were 600 the plasterboard would not reach the next stud. 

Yeah I'm aware of this, it's a while since I've fit any sheets and will check sizes sure everything 2400x1200 now but some used to be 2440 x 1220mm

16 minutes ago, saveasteading said:

This is structural design territory. Your drawings should therefore also specify the stud sizes, and even the fixings.

Your correct, I didn't read the small print on a recent separate structural detail provided by someone else 🤪 It's 400 c/c with 600 vertical noggins including 12mm plyboard.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, saveasteading said:

Screw or nail spec?

The 12mm ply face is to be screwed but the studs it doesn't specify so I'd have thought either. It's for lateral stability to the building not vertical support. Fixings to the masonry walls every 300mm vertical centres via M10 resin chemical anchors.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Studs at 400 lateral centres, noggins at 600 vertical centres with the vertical timbers attached to masonry walls every 300mm via chemical anchors.

Movement joints & outer leaf expansion joints to line up with key areas of where the stud walls are. Walls ties every 225mm around door and window reveals including the expansion joints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/11/2022 at 19:17, ruggers said:

'm just calculating how much timber is required for non load bearing stud walls with 2.4m ceilings

...........

 

First first floor I have to screw some form of plywood or OSB onto one side of the stud walls for lateral support to the building if this affect the requirement for any noggins.

The two bits in bold seem to contradict each other.  either these are load bearing or they are not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, ProDave said:

The two bits in bold seem to contradict each other.  either these are load bearing or they are not.

They don't, lateral support isn't vertical loading. They are stud walls are to be faced with ply to help prevent the upper elevation walls from falling inwards under high winds over time, they are required because my ground floor load bearing walls don't continue up into the first floor. The Joists are supported on the ground floor load bearing walls and the roof trusses support themselves over the span.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ruggers said:

They don't, lateral support isn't vertical loading.

Unfortunately it often partly ends up that way, a non load bearing racking wall can catch you out. Advise you stick with your SE's specification.

 

In written form you have a timber frame panel that carries no vertical load but it needs to stop things moving sideways.

 

Say the top of the panel is loaded horizontally. This horizontal force gets transferred to say the floor below that resists the horizontal force. Now you have two forces acting in equal an opposite directions but they are separated vertically. This introduces an overturning effect into the panel. We call this a complimentary shear force. The static laws of physics say that for a body to remain still every force has to have an equal an opposite force.

 

Thus even though your panel is not carrying a vertical load.. only a wind load the vertical fixings at on side will be subject to uplift and at the other side a downwards force. That is why you may wonder why your SE has come up with what may seem an onerous spec.

 

3 hours ago, ruggers said:

Chemical anchors seems a bit over the top and m10 rawls.

 

image.png.a04b6b9884c3d255ee396d65b11e1909.png

 

 

Edited by Gus Potter
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 23/11/2022 at 00:51, Gus Potter said:

image.png.a04b6b9884c3d255ee396d65b11e1909.png

So the Chemical anchors are also for shear strength in vertical loads where as normal masonry screws or screws and plugs could loosen or bend essentially? There would need to be a lot of direct win load and wall movement to move the block work and timber frame though to band screws?

 

The posi webbed joists under each stud wall are designed with noggins so look like a ladder under the 22mm floor decking.

On 23/11/2022 at 00:51, Gus Potter said:

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dave Jones said:

some osb is not metric so wont work 400/600 centres. 

407mm centres probably won't collapse the house if it's 1220mm sheets.

Probably more important to see if it has to be ply or OSB or either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...