saveasteading

Yes but I wouldn't. Ground moves. If yours is clay it may shrink seasonally. You'll need high quality stone and rather thick. A floating floor of eps will be tricky to get level.

I came across this unanswered post. Do the queries still apply or resolved?

Well done. That is good information and confirms the seriousness. How much less would you have paid if you knew the issue? Will someone else take the risk? The surveyor may be professional or look for a getout. Beware of pallyness and any attempt at agreement or 'looking into it".

A slope is an asset. Your drainage can follow it and not get deep. In sandy soil if you use perforated pipe, only severe rain will reach the end. All your manhole and such, and digester of there is one, are also shallow. You might not need it , but can add a drain before the retaining wall, taking water ro the side.

I had to check you weren't quoting me here. It was the big employer's safety officer. 1. has to be fibreglass, 2. need a mewp to tie it at the top. The latter later appeared to have happened miraculously. Must have been a passing mewp. These people gave h and s a bad name. Are they all in the bottoms of foundations? I think our one ( it was a big company you have heard of) expected a tenner to turn away, but I've never ever done that...scum.

Yes, beware the adverts in the Sun (other unreliable sources may exist) for the cheapest cover. Eg I've had roofers who were insured up to 3m, "and nobody had ever questioned it".

Very glad to hear it. I know there are good ones, and that it is a generalisation and harsh on them. But I have come across real cowboys as well as ignorant ones. They perhaps specialise in selecting the vulnerable public.

Once you've cleared the snow off it and the storm clouds have passed.

I once had the great pleasure of a spot check from hse, and an hour walking round the site with him. The scaffolding was extensive but he didn't ask for papers or tags, just took a commonsense overview. Then up at a complex bit of roof we discussed what risks there were, and maybe moving a couple of poles. Thats the norm unless there is an accident or complaint. So, as you suggest, perhaps have a close look weekly, with some photos. The main risk is likely an unofficial adjustment by a non-scaffolder.

Maybe a single ring hotplate and a pan is the better way. And a battery.

...know or care much about roof and quality. I think it is because it is up high and scary. They get the job because they will do it. Their work often goes unchecked. I had one who didn't even know how to lap felt.

I was shocked when I moved to England and found that timber sarking is not required. I used it on a garage anyway, to the surprise of the bco.

It's a good morning for lessons from Prof. @ProDave. If we wanted the generator just for hunkering down in a corner for a couple of days, then what size of genny would suffice? Freezer, kettle, a few lights, battery chargers, tele, maybe an air fryer can cook everything. Not all on at once. Does a running genny need a minimum load?

My logic is this. The timber is for aesthetics purposes only, and is a luxury that will have costs. The ceiling above it should be constructed to provide whatever performance for fire, sound and heat loss is required. Plasterboard finish if internal, but it doesn't need jointing so is cheap. You may want a black paint on the pb for shadow gaps. It may not be a requirement but I think an intumescent varnish may be prudent, for spread of flame, not as a barrier. If there is no likely source of a fire and it is not above a fire escape route, then don't worry about it, but a cooker beneath would preheat the wood then a fat fire could light it. Timber on walls and ceilings can burn very fast.

Interesting reading on the website. I had never heard of UCEM. Seems to be registered as a charity. Distance learning. £20M assets. £10M per annum wage bill. To be fair it has a "good" ofsted report. So it is legit. Good means passable.

@Jon Eco ResearchDo you have anything to declare? Allegiances, commission, end purpose?

@torrehas reminded us of the degree of slope. It is extreme. Can we just confirm that this is not a local blip but continues over the width? so if the house is say, 8m wide the slope is 150mm ish. And is it the original house and the extension? In which case movement has occurred post extension. You have just bought this based on a surveyor's report. Presumably a properly qualified specialist. Now you must write to the surveyor , probably through your lawyer, to confirm that you have found this issue. It has to be on the record ASAP. I have never known a surveyor put a spirit level on the floor, but that is their decision. This is important so that 1. Your house doesn't fall apart, now or in the distant future 2. Remedies are carried out. 3. The house is saleable in future. Your lawyer will advise further, and all costs will go against the surveyor who will be insured for this. If I was near you then I'd give an off the record opinion. But I'm presumably not. So you need expert inspection and advice. Again ask the lawyer what to do next. And do it on Monday.

As @ProDave says. Make a sketch now of the distances from skirting to plates and pipes. It's easy to forget. Post it on here for comment and it won't get lost either. There will be a solution with noggins or similar. Or using a wider or narrower board so that they are jumped.

For the concrete floor you can latex screed it to level. I once used the same on a dmall area of boarding, and was surprised to find it stayed put. It was a very flexible finished product, almost like a foam shoe sole. But it does sound a little concerning. An inspection and verbal overview from an SE would be my recommendation. OR contact your house insurer.

I once knew all about it, but it was hot and flexible stuff then. I sat on a Blaw Knox paver for months. I don't know the new chemistry or the principles....so I'll say nothing. Perhaps a little. Maybe it is too stiff. Our ground moves a lot, not just at trenches but everywhere and constantly through nature and vehicle load. The old bitumen stuff was very flexible indeed so would bend and stay intact. I daily saw a pile of removed road, perhaps 300 thick. One cantilevered lump, overhanging 600mm, rotated 90° in a summer and stayed in one L shaped piece. I'm suggesting, in all ignorance, that the new make-up is harder. Without an independent research body (old TRRL) we may not find out.

Good point, neither am I. But it should be better than just a loose filling on top.

Thanks for that @ETC. The page and the link. This NI version I have not seen before. It very sensibly allows the shallower depths of 0.3 and 0.4 according to different bedding standards, on the pages before the one you swiped. This shall be the reference from now. The English and Scottish versions don't have this, but imply 0.6 whatever. This table is for rigid pipes but it goes on to discuss flexible pipes and is consistent. I will be reading all of this fine document. The week ends well (not just this). So well that I'm now expecting our home rugby teams to win too. this.

Agreed that Is sensible. Is that written down formally anywhere?

I meant to attach this for anyone interested. It shows depths are to be over 0.6. Anyway I have prevailed and it will now be " as appropriate". If I need an easy argument, it will be that "in a field" implies that it can be ploughed. In a garden isn't covered in table 10, So panic over and 50 years of drains can stay where they are.

It shouldnt be getting ripped up yet. The bitumen (or other bonder) is only surface coating the aggregate so it will be good, blended stone, whatever.