IanR

You only get the 7 year warranty with an approved install via an Approved Installer. Nibe are not catering for the DIY market Nibe has a modbus module that you can add-on. My Loxone communicates with SMO40 controlled via it.

Nibe are excellent, but expensive and they control their installers very well. I have an F2040 and it's never missed a beat in 9 years.

Yep, that's how mine worked. Plus recovery of 20%VAT on any materials you purchase directly, that aren't part of a supply and fit engagement.

Directly on to the Insulated Raft. At the time it was £75/m^2. If you follow the link to my post that -rick- posted, it's got the full info in there.

I can recommend the poured resin option. I also considered all the alternative options. Mines a two colour resin, in the style of a polished concrete finish and most people that visit ask if it is a polished concrete, even though it wasn't the intention to be an exact copy. Lot's of colour options and the different lacquer coats allow for matt, sheen or gloss finishes. I've been pleasantly surprised at how durable it is. It still cleans up (mostly) like new after 9 years and ours has a hard life. They can be re-top coated as well should it ever start to show the wear and tear or you want a different colour/finish.

Here's a reference for what I did on my cow-shed conversion. I built the studwork frame, foamed the steels and cut away any excess with a hand saw, then clad the studwork. If you clad first and try to fill the void with foam it will burst the cladding.

It's a job for a ride-on brush-cutter, a walk behind rotovator is unlikely to handle it and leave you a lot more work to do to get just grass growing.

Not sure how far this chap would travel, but he was very reasonable for me. John Dobson, Essex Mammal Surveys. (He does bats too) https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-dobson-1a7b315a/?originalSubdomain=uk Alternately, look for other surveys submitted for applications on your LPA portal and go with someone not to grand, that tends not to find anything that requires further investigation.

When you say "clumpy", is that foliage that's sprouting in clumps, of is the ground now uneven due to moles and ants etc. A brush-cutter will sort the foliage and after several cuts get the grass growing more evenly. If the ground is uneven, you will still need to clear/mulch as much foliage as possible, but the then either turnover the ground with a large rotovator or bring in new screened topsoil.

Definitely photos needed. If it's "just" brambles, clumps and saplings up to 1" diameter, get started by hiring yourself a ride-on brush-cutter for a weekend. Something like https://hertstools.co.uk/product/as-915-sherpa-2wd-ride-on-mower-hire/ If it's thick bramble and sloping ground then get an AWD version. ...and wear protective clothing if there are brambles and black-thorn etc. Oh, and wait for the area to dry out a little. These brush-cutters are really capable, I was shocked at how they went through saplings and brambles. If you are not in a rush I'd cut it 4 times over the next year to keep knocking back the saplings, and then start digging out the roots of things that won't give up and spraying any re-occurring weeds. How about the boundaries, is there over-grown hedging? Nope, it wouldn't cut through the foliage, and won't leave it suitable for re-seeding.

Dr. Rod Williams (Williams Energy Design): https://mango-projects.co.uk/2020/05/28/who-are-mango-projects-ltd/ https://passivhaus.uk/directory/williams-energy-design/ Rod helped me out on mine and was very good.

Not me either. I did look at it, but went with poured resin directly on the power-floated RC slab.

Yes, that is an ancillary use. You can't add a kitchen and bathroom to make it habitable, independent from the main dwelling.

Yep, should be. You'd be wise to collect evidence of it being your principle residence, ie. registered for Bank, NHS, Council Tax, Utilities at the appropriate address, at the correct times.

Married couples "only" get Private Residence Relief on CGT, on one property (unless you are Angela Rayner). So, depends what you plan to do with the second new-build in your wife's name. If you can apply PRR to the property in your name, any profit you make should be tax free, until Labour change the rules.

You'd need to apply for an S73, variation of conditions, and try to get that condition either removed or reduced from the original planning application. There is a push for LPA's to use Conditions less than they have done in the passed, and old conditions are getting easier to change, especially if they are unrequired today. But, to be successfully, you have to argue that in some way the condition fails to meet at least one of the following 6 tests: Necessary Relevant to planning Relevant to the development permitted Enforceable Precise Reasonable in all other respects Definitely one for a planning consultant. Search for S73 applications on the local planning portal, and try to find a consultant that has successfully achieved similar. It would be worth spending a few hours of time for someone to review the specifics of your planning condition and advise if you would likely be successful.

No, PD only covers use incidental to the main dwelling, which means the building can not be capable of being an independent living space. Normally, the Council will act on a complaint and then give the owner a chance to normalise the situation by submitting retrospective planning. If the planning then fails the building would need to be modified to something acceptable (or meets PD), or removed.

But, a house that has uncontrolled (natural) ventilation above 3m³/m².h@50Pa is deemed to have sufficient ventilation (when combined with trickle vents and wet room extractors). That leakage is unfiltered and without an option to recover energy from. Any additional ventilation brought in by an MVHR system is unrequired, so while it may be filtered and have 85% of the energy recovered from it, it is additional, unrequired ventilation and therefore adds to the energy losses and dust/pollen/pollutants (that make it through the filters) within the house. It's having better air tightness that stops the uncontrolled leakage of warm air and ingress of dust/pollen etc. and then provides the option of heat recovery and filtration.

MVHR doesn't bring benefit in itself, but it facilitates air tightness better than 3m³/m².h@50Pa. Good air tightness brings comfort and energy cost benefits and allows you to then filter the required ventilation to remove duct and pollen. For air tightness greater than 3m³/m².h@50Pa you must have whole house mechanical ventilation.

Muckaway should be less for a raft. Depends. There's no reason for it to be more expensive, in fact it should be cheaper when you compare like-for-like, including performance and include the screed you need on a traditional foundation but don't require on a raft. However, insulated rafts remain niche in the UK and you need to do your own ground works (or hire your own team) otherwise you will be paying a premium for labour, concrete, steel etc. from a company that packages it all up for you. A previous discussion:

If you have "Superfast" then I assume you have a temporary location for the Network provider's ONT box, perhaps on the mobile home side, or a kiosk. If that's the case you need to contact your ISP and ask for an "ONT shift". This is chargeable, so they should arrange for the Network Provider (OpenReach etc.) to come and survey and quote them for the work, which the ISP should then advise you the cost of. You may not get much detail of the works to be completed, but a cost from the ISP for an ONT shift, will confirm to BC that the new poperty will have FTTP. BC are then also asking for you for a schematic that high-lights the ONT position in the new property, they'll want to see provision for any ducting required to get to that position, a power outlet in the close viscinity and your network distribution (Router and Switch) close by.

Bring down the lower edge of the cladding to the top of the ground floor windows, so you can put the top boxes for the ground floor blinds behind the cladding also: +1 for external blinds with automated shading control.

I'm not sure what you mean by "infiltration tunnels" is it a specific product? However, it's not a Council decision, it's a National requirement. If you are going to have a private sewage system in England then you as the operator have to either meet the General Binding Rules or get a permit from the EA. Building Control should require you to do one or the other as per your local council. As the "Operator" of an STP without a permit, you are criminally liable for the STP meeting the GBR's. The wording as been softened in the 2023 version of GBR's to now say they will only bring a criminal prosecution if your STP causes pollution AND you do not meet the GBR's. If the "infiltration tunnels" can be used to construct a drainage field and meet BS 6297:2007, there should be no problem. Edited to add a relevant previous post:

It's not unfortunately, in codifying the requirement natural options have disappeared for perforated tubes with their fixed cross-section and calculable flow-rates, so something more like Still relatively simple, but a second chamber is required for an STP, the first being a settlement chamber to seperate the solids (that needs emptying every 1 - 2 years), then the aerated liquid chamber with a filter media.

That's a misunderstanding. While the discharge has low toxicity, if it is allowed to build up it can get to a hazardous level, so the GBR's require their discharge to be controlled either into a drainage field or a water course.