MikeSharp01

But the PHPP has a cooling via MVHR option that cannot be done feasibly with direct electric - unless you can afford a big enough thermoelectric cooling plant, so ASHP will be a good option for that.

Then it should be OK but check the technical guff on the unit to ensure it can deliver under your circumstances - I dimly recall you need to have a given output temperature for the unit to get the tick in the box and that's a variable.

We have thought about this one a lot - as we approach more advanced years, not so much for the ovens but for the fridge, we have no high units, other than one place in a wall for the ovens - maybe you could do that, in the kitchen only the utility. We have looked at the under counter pull out fridges - EG the Liebherr UIKO1560 which should make access easier and then have a fridge freezer in the utility room for deeper stock! PS - BUT before you take aboard your sons advice ask yourself how often they took aboard any of yours.

Sounds like a plan the PHPP software will tell you if it's a goer!

The heat load is based on the worst day of the average year not the worst monthly average. So bunging the average in won't get you the passive house outcome - you need the worst day, the maximum energy needed to maintain the temperature difference. See here: https://passipedia.org/basics/the_passive_house_-_definition

1 mile is beyond range of 5G mm wave, very high speed, which has a max of 600m range, low band 5G would get there but is much slower maxing out at 50Mbs top end of 4G is in theory better but your speed will be all about how busy the cell is.

Just ran the free version and it gets close to the PHPP outcome.

Can't tell you what that is because the sheet is locked and its on a hidden row, however by unpacking it (pasting the formulas from the hidden rows into another sheet) I can see it takes more factors into account, there are intermediate rows, than are in the table shown above - so I guess its complicated but it must just, in the end, be some function of the values shown.

I found this relatively straightforward guide to the difference between heating demand and heating load. https://sustainableengineering.co.nz/qa-with-jason-explain-heating-load-vs-demand/ there is also a discussion here http://public.wookware.org/gbf/newforum/commentsbb9a.html?DiscussionID=13647 on GBF looking at the same issue. Essentially the two values don't have a direct relationship, and you need to know that the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) & passive house concept generally, has this concept of treated floor area (TFA) which differs from the more traditional floor area - but not significantly for most designs, in ours TFA is 139, and actual is around 150, this is used in PHPP for calculating both Heat Load and Heat Demand but that is where the similarity between the two ends. Heating load is: the number of Watts you need to pour into the house across each square meter of the building's TFA to keep it at set point temperature at the coldest point of the year (it has no time dimension so its an instantaneous thing). In our case this is 8.268W/m2 according the our version of PHPP. Given we have 139m2 of TFA we have therefore need a heating plant capable of delivering: 139 x 8.268 = 1149W or 1.149kW (Which on reflection is bonkers small but that is what PHPP says it is) and as you cannot get a ASHP below 4kW that is the size we we will need. Actuallly in our case, assuming we could get the flow temperature above 42oC space heating via a heat battery in the MVHR would be enough in our case but we have UFH in the slab anyway and will use that. Heating demand is: the total amount of energy required to keep the house at the set point temperature across the whole year, based upon: the average outside air temperature (OAT) each day / week / month (monthly and annual for PHPP) the amount of gains & losses from things like Solar gains (N/S/E/W + Horizontal / Ground) and internal heat gains (people / things / operations - EG Washing up & running the fridge and your mega sound system!) Here is what that looks like for our build in our version of PHPP : So we have will use 1465 kWh/a which comes out at 10.512 kWh(m2a) using the monthly method on our 139m2 TFA given a coefficient of performance (COP) of 3 we will need to pour 488kWh of electricity into our ASHP to keep the house at set point (without cooling - cos PHPP says it won't be a problem, even if I think it will) at 30p a kWh that comes out at £146 pa. Does that clear up the differences for you?

Hi and welcome to THE forum for people like us - looking forward to hearing more about the project and getting your input on heating, which is a widely discussed topic on here.

Interesting. I have one 'radiator' unit I brought to put in the MVHR supply line to allow heating / cooling but I could get another and make two of these, one for each bedroom!

Is this not the very definition of short cycling? Would it be better to run the cooling longer at a higher temperature?

So I clearly need to think this through. I cannot run drains as all the pipe runs are in the ceilings so above and supposed unit. Insulated pipe runs not difficult in the ceilings Electricity is no problem - what controls do these things have?

Just a temperature & relative humidty (RH) sensor, such as the DHT22.

Are you insulating them? What water temperature are you running the FCUs at?

We will be cooling the slab at the same time so the dew point will be important. I guess then that some sort of dynamic dew point (DP) monitoring / calculating will be needed as the various environmental factors affecting DP will be moving about all the time. The good old DHT22 in combination with the Lawrence approximation equation [ Td = T - ((100 - RH)/5.) ] should do that? I cannot see how I can do a drain back the plant area given the way the pipe would need to run - so perhaps that is us out of this one, so that's a few grand saved before breakfast.

There are many on here that extoll the virtues of fan coil units so I thought it would be fun to see if we could put a couple in - one for each bedroom. Looks straight forward enough but two questions come up. Firstly what pipe to use from the plant space to the units. I have found THIS stuff which looks like it should work. Will it? Secondly do I need to provision for a condensate drain back to the plant room and away or can an evaporative approach be taken as in most fridges?

Think the import / export meter should be after the CU so it captures all the loads on the CU not just the inverter / battery combination on the edge of the properties consumption / export.

Good plan Either way you still need an external seal, mastic / silicon or compriband (or similar) (I note they say on the section image that this seal is by others but that must be the installers as the drawing is from the manufacturer) and the EPDM under the window needs to be lapped up the rear of the frame, or when fitted the sill, somewhat to prevent water getting in. It is a poor detail in the way it has been done here by the looks of it but we cannot see how it is detailed. The occasional use of a a few packers looks wrong and the continuous sill sounds like a good outcome. Check the registration details of the installers (well the people you are paying) EG FENSA and then consider talking to them about the quality of work as they may well have sanctions they can use if the reinstall is not to your satisfaction.

Then you will need to do a lot of value engineering or borrowing.

I am no structural engineer but my guess is the three bolt scheme is much better because the extra bolt is taking a chunk of the load and preventing a straight fracture across the two straight up and down bolts - the only thing I really know about structures is that 'triangles' are everything.

Don't say that as I only get to build full time in the vacation - then I am back on the semi retired part time role I have.

In what way have they declined one wonders, fewer of them, fewer visits by the owners?

good move - face the daemons head on.

Nope, no motorways in Norfolk, but not 100 miles to the M11 - the closest I suspect maybe 40 miles. The M11 gets gets you to the bottom of the A11 which is still in Essex - the A11 / A14 bit of the run is good through Cambridgeshire & Suffolk then, when you switch back to the A11 and head for Norwich and into Norfolk, they hit you with a selection of annoyingly busy roundabouts interspersed by some great bits of dual carriageway.