SteamyTea

Apart from the reduced generation is predictable, we can use landfill gas to generation electricity. In 2020 it generated 3.2 TWh (365 MW). If we separate our food waste better, that will improve, though I would like to see a LCA on it. Power from sewage is another technology already in use, as are farm anaerobic digestion systems. Add in some more small scale hydro, a very underused resource in the UK, and I think most of the gaps can be filled. As much as no one likes the idea of usage control, much of it can be done behind the scenes i.e. turning off freezer in supermarkets for a couple of hours.

Had never heard of this process. From a website: "Sioo:x essentially consists of a unique combination of silicon and potassium – two natural substances found all around us and which together create a natural shield similar to nature’s own wood protection." All elements are natural, but usually not found in their natural state, I am not sure how toxic they are, don't mix up silicon with silicone. Elemental potassium explodes in water, so assume it is not on its own, silicon dioxide is nasty.

Yes. Hard to get that message across. In some ways, having higher taxation on discretionary purchased is a good way to raise extra income. Not as if the Range rover or Tesla driver is excluded from driving a Dacia or Kia (though they would still drive like pricks probably).

Will be raining as I think that is half term week.

Might be being set by pumped storage, batteries or nuclear, depends what the auction price was. Not enough of our generation is in the CfD system. But it is totally barmy that after 3 years of primary energy volatility, we have not sorted this out. There must be some emergency laws that allows the contracts to be broken.

As far as I know it is just as an import. Just for a laugh here is the French grid data for the last week.

Won't be long till we have a day of drizzle. That will make your hole moist.

It is the 20+ years of gobbling up £1bn/year and producing nothing that gets my goat. 20 years ago that would have bought a GWp of wind turbines, they would be producing about 3 TWh/year. Then next year, 6 TWh, then 9 TWh.... By now, the money spent on Sinkley Hole would be producing 60 TWh/year, 3 times what Wankey Won't is not producing. We could have stopped installing wind turbines, and assuming that another £10bn will be spent there (just to get rid of the rat infestation) and spent that on battery storage at £500,000/MWh, we would have 20 GWh of distributed storage. And all that while Winkey Wank Hole is still not producing. If I can do the above sums (which may be wrong, sitting in cafe in 15 minutes, it makes me wonder what complete (expletive deleted) allowed it to happen. Not as if no one mentioned to them it was a white elephant.

Don't forget our 1957 contribution. Windscale

I wonder, Hinckley C is going to be produce about 20 TWh/year, at today's prices of £130/MWh. Natural gas is about 80p/therm, or about £27.3/MWh. Assume a thermal efficiency of 50%, that is still only a third of the nuclear price.

I did a quick search earlier on the government website, about CfD and they do use CPI, for the most part.

Pop it into autocorrect. I am still not sure how bit and byte are abbreviated, I assume b for bit, B for byte, only bemuse one is bigger than the other.

They are not your real friends then. Real friends would be helping.

MWh The Bank of England has an inflation calculator that uses consumer price index. £50 in Mar-12 is now £71 £90 is now £128 (CPI is probably not the best indicator for industrial inflation)

They should give the car to the nearest neighbour. That would really rub their noses in it.

Ah, you really are showing your age.

Quite common to do charts like that in the social sciences when the data is often qualative, rather than quantitative. But the data sources are there. I have just been listening to Any Questions, quite an interesting debate about the power outages. What made it interesting is the polarisation i.e. it is renewables, or lack of fossil fuels, or just the drive to net zero, the BBC not trusting the public. Shame that no one said that getting to netball zero involved many different systems being integrated. It is probably that integration that is the real problem. Did make me wonder about how much money gets passed through the London Stock Exchange for high and low carbon industries. Many of those trades will be investing in overseas companies, which should be accounted for when calculating national carbon budgets.

Were are these restrictions, I still have a car, can book a flight, get on a train, even ride a bicycle if I want. Generally yes, but most people do not realise it has to be paid for somewhere. Would it be fairer to charge individuals for their personal usage, charge companies registered in the home country, take it out of general taxation, whichever is applied, there will be a large vocal group that thinks it is wrong. As for health care, we are not doing too bad compared to the rest. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2024/sep/mirror-mirror-2024

My Peugeot 309 TD was the same, major fade after 30 metres, then smoke.

Live and earn, and regardless of how you earn. 'The last refuge of a scoundrel is patriotism' S. Johnson, 1774

But a stone age with cheap, safe food, education, health care, societal safety nets, justice systems, integrated personal transport, public entertainment, very cheap communication.... The world gets better every day. It is too easy to take one personal example and assume that it must also apply to everyone else. Personally I am quite happy that part of my local taxes goes in housing the homeless, I don't want to walk up Market Jew Street and see a dead body in a shop doorway again.

Can you use steam on it? Maybe a wall paper stripper with the bit you hold against the wall removed.

Up until the Russian invasion of Ukraine, I can't think that net zero was costing me anything extra. While kWh prices may have increased, efficiency gains more than counteracted that. My last two cars have regularly used two thirds of the fuel that my cars from twenty years ago used, and they have been better cars. My laptop uses a tenth of the power that my old desktop used, and is more powerful, my house uses a third of the energy compared to when I moved in, with only minor changes to it. I also pay less income tax than I used to in real terms i.e. less cash as the tax free allowance has increased and the lower rate has reduced. I don't wear rose tinted glasses, though I had some 45 years ago (they were all the rage then).

Does it work with Vim, or cocaine?

Lots of Trouble, Usually Serious. Whose Ruth?