Pocster Posted April 22 Author Posted April 22 8 hours ago, -rick- said: @Pocster How desperate are you? Well ! Unfortunately as I presume you now realise the ram shortage is a massive problem - yes , even for Apple . It did look obvious tbh - so now I have to wait for any indicator of ultra appearing and jump on it ! I guess it could be announced at wwdc - maybe have a date for pre orders . Buys Apple time to acquire ram whilst still be bigging up their product . That’s the best I can hope for - a definite date to refresh Apple Store !
-rick- Posted Friday at 14:15 Posted Friday at 14:15 (edited) https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/05/apple-may-take-several-months-to-catch-up-to-mac-mini-and-studio-demand/ Interestingly it mentions TSMC being a bottleneck. TSMC doesn't make RAM. Edited Friday at 14:19 by -rick-
Pocster Posted Friday at 16:57 Author Posted Friday at 16:57 2 hours ago, -rick- said: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/05/apple-may-take-several-months-to-catch-up-to-mac-mini-and-studio-demand/ Interestingly it mentions TSMC being a bottleneck. TSMC doesn't make RAM. TSMC doesn’t make RAM, no one said they do. TSMC is the SoC bottleneck. The RAM shortage is a separate bottleneck, and Apple clearly isn’t immune. Other manufacturers have openly said memory shortages are affecting them, and Cook has said Mac mini / Mac Studio supply-demand balance will take several months. High-memory Mac mini / Studio configs are also exactly where the worst delays and unavailable options have shown up. There are also multiple reports suggesting the memory shortage could last well into 2027 and possibly beyond, especially as AI demand keeps soaking up supply. So pointing out that TSMC doesn’t make RAM doesn’t disprove the RAM issue; it just identifies a different bottleneck.
-rick- Posted Friday at 17:08 Posted Friday at 17:08 9 minutes ago, Pocster said: So pointing out that TSMC doesn’t make RAM doesn’t disprove the RAM issue; it just identifies a different bottleneck. Sure, I just thought it was interesting to highlight.
Pocster Posted Friday at 17:09 Author Posted Friday at 17:09 Even if Mac unified memory and iPhone RAM aren’t identical final packages, they come from the same constrained LPDDR supply chain. Apple then has to allocate that supply across products, and iPhone will obviously take priority over niche high-memory Mac configs.
MikeSharp01 Posted Friday at 21:08 Posted Friday at 21:08 3 hours ago, Pocster said: Even if Mac unified memory and iPhone RAM aren’t identical final packages, they come from the same constrained LPDDR supply chain. Apple then has to allocate that supply across products, and iPhone will obviously take priority over niche high-memory Mac configs. I suppose that consumer high end local LLM schemes need large memory but you can do the same thing with a cloud based one while you await delivery of enough RAM, or whatever other semiconductor you are waiting on. Trouble is that the end of the proverbial rainbow is moving away from you faster than you can stuff memory into machines anyway, so, when your RAM arrives there will be plenty of models it won't run because they have grown, bloated, faster than you can add RAM to your machine.
-rick- Posted Friday at 21:23 Posted Friday at 21:23 12 minutes ago, MikeSharp01 said: I suppose that consumer high end local LLM schemes need large memory but you can do the same thing with a cloud based one while you await delivery of enough RAM, or whatever other semiconductor you are waiting on. Trouble is that the end of the proverbial rainbow is moving away from you faster than you can stuff memory into machines anyway, so, when your RAM arrives there will be plenty of models it won't run because they have grown, bloated, faster than you can add RAM to your machine. Does look that way. New Deepseek one for example, and it's been touted has having huge optimizations for reducing memory usage. It might be much better at storing context but if the model is so huge in the first place it's not easy to run at home. Google seems to have done well with Gemma, but of course that is a lot cut down from the leading models and they aren't releasing those. Doubt any western firm will for 'safety' reasons. So far the Chinese govt doesn't seem to care about that so long as their models spout Chinese propoganda at the relevant moments.
Pocster Posted yesterday at 06:05 Author Posted yesterday at 06:05 8 hours ago, MikeSharp01 said: I suppose that consumer high end local LLM schemes need large memory but you can do the same thing with a cloud based one while you await delivery of enough RAM, or whatever other semiconductor you are waiting on. Trouble is that the end of the proverbial rainbow is moving away from you faster than you can stuff memory into machines anyway, so, when your RAM arrives there will be plenty of models it won't run because they have grown, bloated, faster than you can add RAM to your machine. I’ll use chat as my reasoner but I need local to do my local actioned stuffed until I can source enough ram . Bigger model did mean better but now smaller better optimised models can out perform a larger one . Obviously there’s a point when you can’t go smaller without too much compromise . If you ask ChatGPT itself how long before a model matches its capabilities of today in a ‘ reasonable ‘ size it reckons within 2 years a 256gb model will be comparable to ChatGPT 5.4. That’s insane ! To have that capability sat on your desk in a relatively low ram config. Moe and potentially’ bolt on ‘ specialists seems to be the next level . A medical specialist , maths specialist etc plugged in to the reasoner.
Pocster Posted 6 hours ago Author Posted 6 hours ago After lots of reading ( for probably months ) , YouTube videos etc etc . Enough to confuse anyone I decided to start Avalon . chatgpt and I are architects we setup llama etc , vs studio , ssh into m3 etc etc , even parsec screen share Deepseek is our reasoner . Qwen coder next our sweat shop “ just do it ! “ coder ! chat managed to create me some scripts so we create a brief for today’s task . Get Deepseek to take that and produce a detailed instruction list for qwen . So process is Create task Give to Deepseek Approve Deepseek output Tell qwen to do it ( for reasons I’m unsure of we don’t use git diffs but json - I didn’t argue as it seems to work ) Then some kind of test . Chat gets excited about this ; me less so when terminal window says “ it worked ! “ 😊 But we are building framework and structure first . I’m blown away by this all locally ! llm , creating document for llm to produce detail for another llm Crazy !! 90% of programmers obsolete ! Just todays tasks would have been weeks of learning and work .
Pocster Posted 5 hours ago Author Posted 5 hours ago Notice Mac minis basically out of stock and even a m3 ultra 96gb ( base model ) no where to be seen . I got mine from curry’s of all places ! , check it every few days to judge demand - now they have none ! I think when I sell the m3 I’ll get a pretty good price for it even with m5 released because it’s all going to sell out fast !
JohnMo Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 17 minutes ago, Pocster said: Notice Mac minis basically out of stock and even a m3 ultra 96gb ( base model ) no where to be seen Bought mine the other week from Amazon, just looked and still available. Look harder 1
Pocster Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, JohnMo said: Bought mine the other week from Amazon, just looked and still available. Look harder Yeah it said “ out of stock “ so that’s a clue . Try (expletive deleted)ing reading . Screen grab is from now ! what is it with people on this forum ! I’ll wait for apology
Pocster Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 15 minutes ago, Pocster said: Yeah it said “ out of stock “ so that’s a clue . Try (expletive deleted)ing reading . Screen grab is from now ! what is it with pricks on this forum ! I’ll wait for apology For completeness yes it’s on Amazon apparently at an inflated price . Honestly can everyone (expletive deleted) off on my thread and start a new “ buying Apple llm hardware “ thread rather than being (expletive deleted) wanker ? Also you are right ; so you didn’t spend upwards of 3k + ; just a bs post by you . Should be banned from forum imho - I’ll await @Nickfromwales email . Ffs Edited 3 hours ago by Pocster
MikeSharp01 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Why not get an RTX 5090 card for you desktop pc. True they don't have the shared ram but they should do all you need. I have a 3090 with just 24Gb of ram but it does all I need.
Nickfromwales Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Easy folks. Let’s have a chilled weekend ya. @Pocster, dial it down to a 2, instead of the 10 you seem to have jumped straight to. 1
JohnMo Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Mac mini, M4 is what I quoted and yes it's for sale, delivery on Wednesday. Not sure what you are getting upset about.
Pocster Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago Yeah (expletive deleted)ed this . Admin lock the thread - I can’t be arsed with (expletive deleted)
Pocster Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 38 minutes ago, MikeSharp01 said: Why not get an RTX 5090 card for you desktop pc. True they don't have the shared ram but they should do all you need. I have a 3090 with just 24Gb of ram but it does all I need. A sane person . Problem is unified ram . Best on Nvidia is 96gb on rtx6000 that’s a 10k gpu card !!!! This is why Apple have ( unintentionally) jumped to number 1 for local llm . Edited 2 hours ago by Pocster
Pocster Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Nickfromwales said: Easy folks. Let’s have a chilled weekend ya. @Pocster, dial it down to a 2, instead of the 10 you seem to have jumped straight to. There he is … Bro ! @Nickfromwales not worth the hassle with @JohnMo - he’s been a prick before . Just lock / delete the thread please . I was only trying to share my adventure/ futility / hobby . But tbh it isn’t worth the bollocks . I post here rather than Reddit for that very reason . But I can’t be bothered anymore with (expletive deleted) posts . So respectfully lock / delete thread and I will continue my quest on my own . Edited 2 hours ago by Pocster Hairy vag
SteamyTea Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Don't lock it down, I am waiting for the ultimate answer. 1
Pocster Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago 8 minutes ago, SteamyTea said: Don't lock it down, I am waiting for the ultimate answer. I’ll give you a 69
AliG Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago @Pocster Can you just take a breath please and I think we can leave the thread running.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now