Jump to content

Trusses against brick wall


Recommended Posts

We have a lower level roof (half flat half pitched) that the designer has used JHI masonry hangers to attach to the wall at one end (circled below). The wall is already built and I was wondering if people thought cutting a masonry joist hanger in to an existing wall is harder than using a ledger board and timber joist hangers?

 

image.png.4738e0746f3a59007899d09fa782966a.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You generally fit them with an angle grinder instead of drilling out the mortar. 

Get the hangers that also have flanges on the sides to take bolts. 

 

Draw a straight line across the wall and do a series of deep grooves the thickness of the cutter blade, you will find the flange on the hanger is about the same thickness 2-3mm, hammer in the hanger with a club hammer, when all plumb and lovely add a bolt to each side flange. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Russell griffiths said:

You generally fit them with an angle grinder instead of drilling out the mortar. 

Get the hangers that also have flanges on the sides to take bolts. 

 

Draw a straight line across the wall and do a series of deep grooves the thickness of the cutter blade, you will find the flange on the hanger is about the same thickness 2-3mm, hammer in the hanger with a club hammer, when all plumb and lovely add a bolt to each side flange. 

 

That sounds good. Do you know of any brands that make that type to help me find them? They sound like they are designed to avoid the need for mortar or resin with the tab that tucks into the brickwork.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Russell griffiths said:

If you use this type you can just bolt on.   [Simpson SAE]

 

Yes I saw that type when looking just now and that doesn't have any tabs that tuck in. I like the sound of the hybrid approach you described as that seems like the best of both worlds.

 

The SWL (probably 2.2kN aka 220kg) isn't particularly good which is a shame [datasheet]. The tuck in type have about 3x the SWL [their datasheet].

 

image.png.66c267d4523148fcb7a7b0d02f189b2e.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I spoke to Simpson StrongTie and they said the masonry application is still possible, but they found it raised more questions than it was worth and they preferred it to involve an Engineer. For example worries that people may bolt them into a bed rather than mid block/brick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
3 minutes ago, Oz07 said:

Just use a board way easier. 

 

Yes I'm going to go that way. I also saw that he NHBC says that masonry hangers shouldn't be cut "into the walling" I presume that means shouldn't be retro fit rather than saying it shouldn't be cut in to the block itself. Also, some other warranty providers stipulate that materials shouldn't be mixed in the area and I have a transition from blockwork to brickwork at this level.

 

Just need to decide my ledger board size. At one end of it I am going to rest it on the wallplate of a perpendicular wall as well. If I had thought about t more, I could have built it in to the wall at the other end as well but that's not a big issue. 

 

image.thumb.png.ace43ed8bfce1c9c974e4722866c12c1.png

https://nhbc-standards.co.uk/6-superstructure-excluding-roofs/6-4-timber-and-concrete-upper-floors/6-4-13-joists-into-hangers/

 

image.png.24bc25dd02136b8f72ad2beacd30e9d1.png

https://9329f7a9-f105-4a46-b2bc-a658e29c21db.filesusr.com/ugd/981144_d12f36e2d1bb4fe78f9179e65dd7981f.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, MortarThePoint said:

I also saw that he NHBC says that masonry hangers shouldn't be cut "into the walling" I presume that means shouldn't be retro fit rather than saying it shouldn't be cut in to the block itself.


Ignore the NHBC. They say a lot of things that go against the MIs and in the end it will be a question of whether you’ve followed the MIs rather than a trade body if things go wrong. 
 

I would be using a strongly restrained fixing in your case as there is more of a rotational pull on those mountings as the truss will try and pivot on the wall plate and the top mounting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PeterW said:

I would be using a strongly restrained fixing in your case as there is more of a rotational pull on those mountings as the truss will try and pivot on the wall plate and the top mounting. 

 

I don't see what you mean. tipping of the hanger side to side? There isn't a top mounting just bracing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MortarThePoint said:

 

I don't see what you mean. tipping of the hanger side to side? There isn't a top mounting just bracing.


so your truss will rotate about the fixed point. The wall plate on the right is static (red triangle) the weight of the truss will try and push downward but rotate around its axis so there is a pull force exerted on the fixings of the bottom chord and it will try and push itself past the wall plate. 
 

Crude arrows below ..!!

 

 

BC67722A-9DF5-42B8-A75A-67776D79DC05.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi MortarThePoint.

 

The ledger option can work well but as Peter points out you get this twisting effect.

 

Often you get stuck with ledgers as you stuggle to get the fixing capacity. Many fixings are rated on, not least, being fixed away from the mortar bed etc. If you have perforated bricks say the capacity of the fixings really drops off. Expanding type anchors don't work well in perforated brick and there is little test data available.

 

I have attached a very quick sketch showing another way of doing this where you extend the bottom chord and pocket the wall. You can add glued hardwood packers to level up. Here you get a good solid bearing on the masonry and by using the dwangs / noggings you can add extra horizontal tying of the trusses into the existing wall.

 

You may need to beef up the bottom chord a little as it is acting in shear rather than bearing.

 

image.thumb.png.1fb70f50f9406dcc50fa265bb70c887e.png

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Oz07.

 

This can work out as a simple solution. If you are doing it DIY then it can work well. You can chain drill the pockets with an SDS drill, take your time, avoid dropping a lot of fragments down the cavity (if you have a cavity wall) while getting the pockets pretty level.

 

Also, with a horn like this you get a little more play in the trusses. Say the wall you are joining onto is not straight then you can move the trusses a little horizontally so the rafters of the trusses plane nicely. Often you get the horn a little longer then trim on site to suit.

 

With the hanger option you often find that the nails for the hangers (or hangers themselves) clash with the truss nail plates and intuitively we know that if you have too many nails in a bit of timber this is not a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, PeterW said:


so your truss will rotate about the fixed point. The wall plate on the right is static (red triangle) the weight of the truss will try and push downward but rotate around its axis so there is a pull force exerted on the fixings of the bottom chord and it will try and push itself past the wall plate. 
 

Crude arrows below ..!!

 

 

BC67722A-9DF5-42B8-A75A-67776D79DC05.jpeg

 

Thank you for the consideration and the diagram! I think it will only try to pull laterally if the top vertical left hand member in the diagram contacts the wall, which it doesn't. That vertical member is 25mm nominal from the wall so the only member contacting static points is the bottom chord at the wallplate (R) and at the hanger (L).

Edited by MortarThePoint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...