Jump to content

Selling an old house - what would you do?


Country Geek

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, ProDave said:

I would love to know what happened there.  the "join" ends 2/3 of the way up. Above that the bricks are bonded across properly.  It's like a small building got extended to the side and over the top?

 

How do you know it's going to be an issue in surveys if there is no sign of movement?

 

Any attempt to cover it up would just be seen as trying to hide a fault.

Its an end of terrace of a row of 5 cottages that used to be farm outbuildings I think. 

 

I just know it was an issue last time round but I never got to the bottom of why there were issues. Nobody actually gave us the exact reason, I am only assuming it was this that flagged up.

 

I don't know where I'd be able to find the buildings full history ? Any ideas?

Edited by Country Geek
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Country Geek said:

of 5 cottages that used to be farm outbuildings


there you go, altered/extended, proper join, unless there is evidence of movement it’s not a problem. Tell any buyer that!!! If you can find any history, buyers like that sort of thing.

Edited by joe90
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there another one on the other end of the terrace?

 

I would say it looks like a small terrace or barn that was extended for growth 150 years ago reusing the structure, and for some reason the bit on the end was removed afterwards. May have been a former house or some sort of barn. To make a road?

 

There may be foundations under that bit of the path / side track. The mortar came out over time and someone bodged it with goo.

 

IMO a surveyor should mention that as it is obvious.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that would smarten it up and to a small extend "hide" the obvious joint is paint the end wall white to match the front.

 

If the front is render, not just paint, then render the end wall would certainly hide the issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Ferdinand said:

Is there another one on the other end of the terrace?

 

I would say it looks like a small terrace or barn that was extended for growth 150 years ago reusing the structure, and for some reason the bit on the end was removed afterwards. May have been a former house or some sort of barn. To make a road?

 

There may be foundations under that bit of the path / side track. The mortar came out over time and someone bodged it with goo.

 

IMO a surveyor should mention that as it is obvious.

 

The other end is rendered. 

 

31 minutes ago, ProDave said:

One thing that would smarten it up and to a small extend "hide" the obvious joint is paint the end wall white to match the front.

 

If the front is render, not just paint, then render the end wall would certainly hide the issues.

Yep, could do, big job though, and as I say its not really a buyer issue it's more mortgage lender surveyors. We had lots of interest last time round and not one person (buyer) noticed it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Country Geek said:

The other end is rendered. 

 

Yep, could do, big job though, and as I say its not really a buyer issue it's more mortgage lender surveyors. We had lots of interest last time round and not one person (buyer) noticed it. 

 

In which case I would probably tidy up the joint (and perhaps apply some dust to the mortar ... think hidden tunnel entrances and Colditz ?), and have a clear explanation ready for when anyone asks. Including that piccie showing where the extra building used to be, plus any maps etc.

 

My usual source for old maps is https://www.old-maps.co.uk/#/ there are others.

 

F

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ferdinand said:

 

So your audience to convince is surveyors.


if a surveyor says that’s a crack then yes I would challenge it, it’s obviously a join and no sign of settlement above or below that join. I have challenged surveyors before (and won). When selling my late parents house a surveyor made several assumptions that were plainly incorrect and when I presented my evidence they retracted their findings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Country Geek said:

The other end is rendered. 

 

Yep, could do, big job though, and as I say its not really a buyer issue it's more mortgage lender surveyors. We had lots of interest last time round and not one person (buyer) noticed it. 

Does that mean a sale fell through because a survey stopped someone getting a mortgage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ferdinand said:

 

So your audience to convince is surveyors.

Which repointing the joint will not do, that will just draw attention to it and make them suspicious.

 

The best thing for a surveyor is leave it alone so he can SEE the joint is old and there is no movement or cracking, and an explanation of how the building changed many years ago to leave a joint like that.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You now have lots of multiple-choice advice, and need to decide what to do ? . Best of luck with it all.

 

The centipede was happy quite

Until the frog in fun asked

"Pray,  which leg goes after which?"

She worked her mind to such a pitch

she lay distracted in a ditch

considering how to run.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Ferdinand said:

You ask your solicitor.

Thanks, I always thought indemnity policies only covered building work with no building regs, not necessarily structural defects. Are all conveyancing solicitors much of a muchness or are there some specialists in older houses?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...