The stainless steel ones seem pretty good. I had one fitted and it stopped the rats and has not caused blockages. Some of them have a mechanism that allows them to be fitted fairly deep in an inspection chamber.
We put standing seam on a roof and the customer had solar added. The were fixed by brackets that clamped onto the standing seams. The roof actually had a slight fall to north but it still worked fine. The standing seam was Kalzip type.
Agree with @Spinny if the rule was not around until 2023 your steel was already in. Point this out to BC. You can't comply with rules that did not exist at the time.
I think the rules are about right. The planning officer can ask for further details of anything relevant if required. Measuring and detailing the height and position of all surrounding buildings, rooflines, eaves, windows, ground levels etc. is pointless for most applications.
It depends on what is around you. Sometimes full elevations of nearby buildings, always drains, covers, inverts, pylons. Our architects just use 2D as you don't gain much with 3D and it adds to design time.
Rendered concrete block outer leaf, 50mm cavity, Rockwool insulation between 140 studs, 40mm PIR, 25mm service cavity, resilient bars, plasterboard. Inexpensive and very effective. Less than 400mm.
If that is the case, make no provision for them. Do not suggest to tenants that they are authorised to install batteries. A world of liability for you.
That is dreadful. You need to use the main flow of the chamber for at least one junction. Use a smaller IC, add 45s to the main inlet and outlet. Move the chamber down and right. If you want I can do a sketch.