In your situation you have to consider the interstitial condensation risk, or at least consider whether there might be one. Adding another layer - in this case separated by a skin of brick - further cools the inside of the external skin. I am a great believer in dynamic condensation risk assessment. WUFI is the only one I am familiar with, but I gather there is another. The BS 'Glaser' Method is a bit of a blunt instrument and makes assumptions which are simply not always true (for example that all the moisture in a 'sandwich' will come from inside).
Sadly I think, even now, there is a scarcity of WUFI-wranglers. Some merchants offer it 'free' for buying their materials.
I have used the warm batten method a lot, and have 'championed' it (more that it's better than hiding vulnerable battens on the cold side than that it is the bee's knees, and always in the context that I am thoroughly 'sold' on rigid, dense, wood-fibre on the basis that if it functions without a VCL then there isn't a VCL to screw up myself or have subsequent 'generations' screw up for me), but I note now that the BEIS guidance for IWI effectively says 'vapour-open' (wood-fibre, cork, etc) or 'ventilated cavity. IIRC they say 25mm, which strikes me as too small, but that's gut-feeling, not physics. I also worry about 'real-life' situations actually giving you a properly-cross-ventilated, properly 'purged' cavity.
Of your 2 possibilities gypliner (which I have never used, BTW) could give you the ventilated cavity.