Roger440 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 7 hours ago, pulhamdown said: The problem is there is very limited scope to use initiative. It's a tick box system on a tablet. The "computer says no" was never more accurate, sadly Maybe you misunderstood my suggestion? You simply tick different boxes. Job done. No one is ever going to check. Find the right one, they wont even visit the house.
SteamyTea Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago By the time you have used a dozen EPC assessors, to find the one that gives you the result you want, it would be cheaper to just put the house right. I really don't think it is sensible to suggest that the assessor is asked to cheat. I have had too many experiences recently dealing with cheating and lying customers. No one benefits. 2
saveasteading Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago If you consult them early, they can assess off plan, and that is the time to change the design or argue the niceties. We've done that and established that we don't have technical disagreements, and had some good advice. The assessor is highly engaged in interested, including alternative opinions.
SimonD Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 56 minutes ago, SteamyTea said: By the time you have used a dozen EPC assessors, to find the one that gives you the result you want, it would be cheaper to just put the house right. I really don't think it is sensible to suggest that the assessor is asked to cheat. I have had too many experiences recently dealing with cheating and lying customers. No one benefits. Of course it's not sensible. It's also unrealistic. The EPC assessor actually has relatively little choice as it's the reduced SAP so simplified and based on lots of assumptions, and of course, it's actually fairly reasonable for an assessor to have to make assumptions without invasive investigations. The EPC is cheap too, so the expectations that a fee of less than £100 is going to give you something that's really accurate is a bit like expecting an accurate air permeability measurement for £50 quid with someone licking their finger and sticking it in the air) instead of a blower or pulse test. And one of the reasons why they're so conservative is partly because I bet a lot of customers ask them to inflate the report so they benefit from it. 49 minutes ago, saveasteading said: If you consult them early, they can assess off plan, and that is the time to change the design or argue the niceties. We've done that and established that we don't have technical disagreements, and had some good advice. The assessor is highly engaged in interested, including alternative opinions. But this isn't with an EPC assessor, rather it's for someone actually doing the fully SAP?
saveasteading Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 17 minutes ago, SimonD said: doing the fully SAP True.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now