Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Brett Martin's B2803 is a 90 degree 280mm inspection chamber, but the exits have a sharp 45 bend with the channel being straight within the inspection region. Osma's 4D918, on the other hand, has the bend in the inspection region. Osma have a useful selector, a copy attached. Slightly bigger though, 315mm vs 280mm. Here's some information about their Multi-Base IC range.

 

The Osma 4D918 looks a bit silly from above, but there is a straight alternative (4D910) that could be used with 45 elbows.

 

Even the smaller (250mm) Osma 4D960 could be used with two 45 elbows.

 

Brett Martin B2803:

image.png.320734531b0496eeeba33be50f92a0e9.png

 

Osma 4D918:

image.png.31dc4e29c6799a719b6334c52d3d827c.png

WAJ-PVC-Base-RB-Nr2-315-2x110?io=transform%3Afill%2Cwidth%3A3840OSMA 315MM MULTI-BASE Inspection Chamber Base inc. 90° Bent Channel 110mm  4D918 £30.00 - PicClick UK

 

Osma 4D960:

image.png.39b11459e1d477a437d7c22fca32225c.png

F0026752_0001.pdf

Posted
1 hour ago, MortarThePoint said:

Brett Martin's B2803 is a 90 degree 280mm inspection chamber, but the exits have a sharp 45 bend with the channel being straight within the inspection region.

 

They look very useful.  I have used straight ones with a 45 either end, but that meant extra fittings, more cost and more space.

Posted

Osma is always expensive, even discounted. Of course it is high quality and gets specified on big jobs. But for 1/3 the price everything  on the cheaper stuff still works OK.

The only advantage of the big names that I have perceived in real life is the ease of joining. Down a wet trench on a frosty day that £10 may be worth it, but not normally.

 

And are the pipes equally strong? That doesn't matter if properly surrounded.

Posted

I've done a good workaround for that osma 90 base above. I have a load of long rest bends and if you look at these its marked where to cut out to use on flat. Then I set on lean mix and benched around the opening with compo and just used standard risers around it. Worked a treat. Not sure how much cheaper it is if you have to buy the bends I already had them. 

Posted

Why don't you rip the existing ic out, put a 5 inlet ic inline with your run and extaend the existing pipes to meet to new ic. 

Posted

For the two turns, I think I'll use Osma 4D960 plus two bends as I've identified a cheap source and didn't like the look of their 90 bend chamber (4D918) and the total cost of that was looking like £100+ each. The first corner can be achieved with a total turn of 2x22.5=45 if I bring the pipe out from the house at 45 degrees. Despite all being level invert, it says to always use the main channel rather than make the turn with the chamber's 45 inlet.

 

I loved the look of the Polypipe SFA7 option but it's too expensive.

Posted

Estimating how much gravel is needed. For 110mm pipe, the trench needs to be at least 410mm wide and the depth of the gravel at least 210mm including the height of the pipe or 160mm if ground suitable. That works out as 0.41m*0.21m = 0.086 m3/m or 0.41m*0.16m = 0.66 m3/m (ignoring pipe for contingency). Round that up to 0.09m3/m or 0.7m3/m. A bulk bag of pea gravel seems to be about 2/3 m3 so that provides enough for 7m or 10m of pipe.

 

7m or 10m per bulk bag. Does that sound right?

 

10mm pea gravel links:

   https://www.travisperkins.co.uk/bagged-aggregates/travis-perkins-gravel-and-shingle-bulk-bag-10mm/p/938182

   https://www.jewson.co.uk/p/pea-gravelpipe-bedding-bulk-bag-AGSTB016

   https://www.wickes.co.uk/Tarmac-10mm-Gravel-Pea-Shingle---Jumbo-Bag/p/131897

 

Osma:

image.png.622613ba10339cf520d0d4747a5a01ea.png

image.png.81bd8027eb002b08a76d550ab4569390.png

PolyPipe:
image.png.fd6b9403de5ae6ae5a145d58c1403509.png

Posted

Haven't checked the sums but seems rightish.  Beyond about 5 bags it might be worth buying a small truck load, but wastage can be worse.

Bags can be offloaded and spread around near the points of use to reduce barrowing. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

trench width seems big I've seen plenty of drain runs excavated with a 12" bucket. Is that a reg or just a guide?

Posted
5 hours ago, Oz07 said:

trench width seems big I've seen plenty of drain runs excavated with a 12" bucket. Is that a reg or just a guide?

 

I was surprised too. Can't see it in part H, but the manufacturers seem to agree as I think Floplast also has that. Seems a tad excessive and a 12" bucket feels sensible and would provide 100mm on three sides of the pipe 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...