Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

From my house the land slopes away to the east about 15- 20 feet downwards over about 50 metres towards farmland. We have a 3/4 acre plot. The rain water that used to fall where the house now sits never caused any issues with flooding to anyone. So my question: is it possible to just run some drain pipes from my gutters say half way down the slope and let the rainwater soak away naturally. I am trying to avoid an expensive and large soakaway if i can.

Posted

You'd need to run the pipes into something to allow the rainwater out, so some form of soakaway with crates, terram, and gravel should suffice.  What would you deem as expensive?  Have building control indicated anything size wise?

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Post and beam said:

pipes from my gutters say half way down the slope and let the rainwater soak away naturally

I doubt building control would be happy.

 

Why does a rain water soak away from have to be big or expensive. In it's simplest form it's a hole lined with membrane a 110mm pipe has slots cut in the bottom and it's back filled with crushed rock. You don't even need crates. We ended up with 2 and they took half a day each - one man and a digger.

 

Ours before and after filling for 250m² of roof.

 

IMG_20200812_132009.thumb.jpg.62039f93bb2c34c903b391fc9b99d8e2.jpgIMG_20200812_151422.thumb.jpg.b93f64cd589d04f7998e5cf290c9f16c.jpg

 

 

Edited by JohnMo
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, JohnMo said:

I doubt building control would be happy.

 

Why does a rain water soak away from have to be big or expensive. In it's simplest form it's a hole lined with membrane a 110mm pipe has slots cut in the bottom and it's back filled with crushed rock. We ended up with 2 and they took half a day each - one man and a digger.

 

 

yep this, like most things, would these days cost more in labour than materials.

Posted
6 hours ago, crispy_wafer said:

  Have building control indicated anything size wise?

4 metres by 3.5 metres at > 1.5 metres deep plus a silt trap.

 

4 hours ago, ToughButterCup said:

'SUDS' and 'Rain Garden' .

Will do. Thanks.

 

6 hours ago, crispy_wafer said:

What would you deem as expensive?

In excess of £8k

 

6 hours ago, JohnMo said:

it's a hole lined with membrane a 110mm pipe has slots cut in the bottom and it's back filled with crushed rock.

You cannot do that anymore. I have a huge pile of rubble that would do the trick but it has to be crates

Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, Post and beam said:

n excess of £8k

Christ alive, indeed, yes, I’m sure it can be done cheaper, so what about 20m2 ish, quick search suggests 150 per m3 for crates, but i bet cheaper if bought from your local civils place. Then backfill with pea gravel, hire in a machine for a weekend.  Back of hand calcs suggest less than half your 8k, or am i being  optimistic

Edited by crispy_wafer
Posted
24 minutes ago, JohnMo said:

Are you sure, not what building regs says!

JohnMo: No not sure, i trusted what i was told by BC & others.  Its worth learning how to use a digger i think.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Post and beam said:

Its worth learning how to use a digger i think.

Indeed, right of passage for any self builder.  Sounds like you have plenty of room to practice.  

Posted
57 minutes ago, crispy_wafer said:

Indeed, right of passage for any self builder.  Sounds like you have plenty of room to practice.  

The plot is 3/4 acre and sloping away from the house. Which is why i question the need for any soakaway. I cant see why i cant just run perforated pipes down the slopes. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Post and beam said:

Which is why i question the need for any soakaway

If building regs says you need one - you need one. It does say that, so you do. Why waste effort trying to push against the tide?

Posted

And if emotionally you do need to understand the logic behind such rules (as I do) think about the potential erosion that uncontrolled rainwater flows could cause.   Houses with rainwear are very good at concentrating a benign rainstorm into a damaging localised flow. 

Posted
29 minutes ago, G and J said:

And if emotionally you do need to understand the logic behind such rules (as I do) think about the potential erosion that uncontrolled rainwater flows could cause.   Houses with rainwear are very good at concentrating a benign rainstorm into a damaging localised flow. 

Attenuation is required - or you end up with a big gapping hole (sink hole), is what you are saying. So building regs state soak away for a good reason. Or spend your life savings building a house, and have it fall in a big hole in 10 to 15 year time. Wouldn't like to have that conversation with the wife.

Posted

What soil type do you have? Have you done a percolation test? That might show a smaller soakaway is needed.

 

 

Posted
39 minutes ago, JohnMo said:

If building regs says you need one - you need one.

 I get it, i just dont understand the logic.

39 minutes ago, JohnMo said:

Why waste effort trying to push against the tide?

Becuase its a very expensive thing.

 

 As regards attenuating against a large sink hole.

The water from a soakaway will leach away at some rate.

 

The same volume of water from 4 x gutter pipes laid underground and sloping away would leach away at the same rate over a large area. But crucially be easier(cheaper) for me to install.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Temp said:

What soil type do you have? Have you done a percolation test? That might show a smaller soakaway is needed.

 

 

Soil samples were taken prior to groundworks from 3 sites on the plot. Based on whatever was discovered a percolation test was not required.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Post and beam said:

Soil samples were taken prior to groundworks from 3 sites on the plot. Based on whatever was discovered a percolation test was not required.

I thought they were different tests.  
 

Every day is a school day it seems.  
 

But, for the want of a few minutes with a bucket and spade you might discover something useful and save yourself some money.  I’m not talking sandcastles…

Posted
9 hours ago, Post and beam said:

Soil samples were taken prior to groundworks from 3 sites on the plot. Based on whatever was discovered a percolation test was not required.

Sorry that is nonsense. Where are you getting this bad information?

 

3.28 Percolation tests should be carried out to determine the capacity of the soil (see Approved Document H2 paragraphs 1.34 to

1.38). Where the test is carried out in accordance with Approved Document H2, the soil infiltration

rate (f) is related to the value Vp....

Posted
4 minutes ago, torre said:

I thought rubble filled was still allowed, but has to be about 3x larger than crates.

Even shows the drawing in building regs. Took me two minutes to find it.

Posted
1 minute ago, torre said:

I thought rubble filled was still allowed, but has to be about 3x larger than crates.

I'm surprised it's only 3 times bigger. When you think about the void in crates, against rubble. Want you soakaway to last a few years. Then rubble is the way to go. If you have got great draining ground, you might get away with rubble.

Posted
9 hours ago, Post and beam said:

The same volume of water from 4 x gutter pipes laid underground and sloping away would leach away at the same rate over a large area

You need the capacity (volume) to contain a storm surge of rainwater. If you can demonstrate your pipes have 21m3 capacity, BC should accept it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...