Jump to content

Raised Patio & Building Control/Safety


Jimbo37

Recommended Posts

Eh up all,

I'm building a house above flood level, which takes me to a ffl (and patio level) of about 1150mm above my rear garden. In an ideal world, I'd like full width steps, for view and simplicity, but I dont think this is acceptable to BC. My reading suggests a railing of 1100mm and handrails on the steps etc. Are there other less obtrusive ways of meeting the regulations, eg keeping people back from the edge, maybe with a planter or other creative ideas? Im really not a fan of cleaning glass! Any tips or pointers, please?

Edited by Nickfromwales
Title typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, markc said:

I’m afraid it’s railings, wall or balustrade.. or earth bank/slope to reduce drop to less than 300mm (pretty sure it’s 300)

Approved Document K

a. in dwellings: provide pedestrian guarding that is capable of preventing people from being injured by falling from a height of more than 600mm

That's why I built my lawn retaining wall to be 590mm high.

IMG_20230121_110738673_HDR.jpg.6d67fc99cbc897f55c29b98f0f112335.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Nickfromwales changed the title to Raised Patio & Building Control/Safety
  • 1 month later...
On 18/02/2023 at 17:38, ETC said:

Move the drop more than 3.0m away from the house. You shouldn’t need guarding.

My deck is 4m deep (back wall of house to edge of deck) - does that excuse me from railing?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is yes. Basically it says that guarding should be provided to a sunken area within 3m of the building ie to a drop within 3m of the building. By extension if it’s beyond 3m guarding is not needed. It’s not what it says but what it doesn’t say. TBH paragraph 5.2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ETC said:

It is yes. Basically it says that guarding should be provided to a sunken area within 3m of the building ie to a drop within 3m of the building. By extension if it’s beyond 3m guarding is not needed. It’s not what it says but what it doesn’t say. TBH paragraph 5.2.

 

I  can't recall where I read it but I gathered that the thinking behind the 3m rule was that people coming out of a building would have an expectation of there being no unsafe drops in the near vicinity. It's a consequence of there being prescriptive safety regulations for the inside of buildings.

That's the paradox of safety regulations. A human behaviour called risk compensation means that sometimes the safest feature might be one that's clearly dangerous. Like having a big sharp spike coming out the middle of your steering wheel might make you drive more safely than having an air bag there.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 29/03/2023 at 20:47, ETC said:

Yep.

05356365-13A7-45F2-93C0-5AAEDAE00D0B.png

 

ETC can you tell me from what document you are quoting and is it a UK released one? Can you provide a link to it?

 

I could not find this reference in Part M or K and no mention of it on the NHBC website.

(I have a similar situation where we are extending a bungalow with a sloping/falling garden and the finished floor is some 70cm above. To put a zero threshold leading onto a patio stepped to the garden we are being told conflicting information. ie, take the drop measurement from the original build line which is 30cm and proceed without guarding, or step each following patio area by 220mm risers until the base of the slope is reached, each terraced area being at least 60cm across.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...