Jump to content

Drainage/waste pipe depths


Vijay

Recommended Posts

Is there a minimum that the drainage/waste pipes need to be under external finished ground level? I need to look at the drainage points and work out falls.

 

Is between 1 in 40 and 1 in 110 for falls right?

 

Cheers

 

Vijay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1:80 to 1:40 is the recognized limits for underground with 1:100 being a real exception usually used on internal soil runs if you can't get the falls. 

 

Ideally you want 250mm coverage on the pipes but on sloping ground that can be a challenge so look at using a couple of chambers with back drops to get some depth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always found it easier to start at the destination (entry to treatment plant for example) which will usually have a fixed depth, and then work that backwards towards the house, and see what sort of sensible fall you can achieve without the pipe getting too close to the surface.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on what is happening on the ground, I.e. Garden, path, drive etc. It's all here, happy bed time reading ( I know because I had to read it all).  

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/442889/BR_PDF_AD_H_2015.pdf

 

because I was limited to the depth i could go, I started at the shallowest pipe ( garage toilet) and worked my way downhill, I just hope by the time I get to the treatment outfall I am ok, if not I will have to have a pumped solution ?

Edited by joe90
Add
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
5 minutes ago, Vijay said:

Would running a 10m+ pipe run under the house be a stupid idea? A friend made the point of you could never replace it if you ever needed to

 

Plenty do - and a properly laid pipe with lintels or movement joints as it passes over the founds should mean it's fine for decades. UPVC is inert and underground it has none of the problems of sunlight etc. degrading the plastic. 

 

Is it shown on the plans ..??

 

And if you've got B&B floors then there will be no impact or loading on the pipes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, the pipes are run around the house but I always thought that it would be a shame to have manholes/rodding points showing in the rear outside area.

 

This is the service plan which I've shown the manhole locations in red dots. As you can see it doesn't make sense not to utilise the manhole at the bottom (of the page).


Drainage points are the blue dots

Services1.jpg

Edited by Vijay
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Oz07 said:

I'd rather have ic's and ridding points than not have them and need them!  You know you can use the lids which can be paved

Yeah I know you can get the paved ones but you can obviously still see they're there. Just looking for alternative solutions, but I completely understand your point of having them, cos if there's a blockage, I'd curse myself if I didn't ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best practice is not to try and have large numbers of flows into a single IC especially if the main branch is only 110mm. What @Nickfromwales is suggesting is correct - you would use 2 or 3 smaller (ie 300mm) ICs to collate the flow from say 2 WCs or stacks, and then feed them to a further IC later in the chain, with a single 110mm (or 160mm if flow dictates) leaving the property.

 

Do you have an M&E plan for the build as if you are looking at multiple WCs then be mindful of Part H and the various depths and falls required.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Vijay said:

Sorry Nick, I meant can they be stacked vertically? In line would then have 2 manhole covers surely?

You can make a 'back drop' chamber but it's a bit yesteryear. I'd just combine flows with smaller local ICs and then join the main run larger IC accordingly. 

Maybe best to run this past your BCO TBH rather than just steaming ahead ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nickfromwales said:

You can make a 'back drop' chamber but it's a bit yesteryear. I'd just combine flows with smaller local ICs and then join the main run larger IC accordingly. 

Maybe best to run this past your BCO TBH rather than just steaming ahead ;)

Understood, I will go inline but check with the BCO before I do anything :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PeterW said:

Best practice is not to try and have large numbers of flows into a single IC especially if the main branch is only 110mm. What @Nickfromwales is suggesting is correct - you would use 2 or 3 smaller (ie 300mm) ICs to collate the flow from say 2 WCs or stacks, and then feed them to a further IC later in the chain, with a single 110mm (or 160mm if flow dictates) leaving the property.

 

Do you have an M&E plan for the build as if you are looking at multiple WCs then be mindful of Part H and the various depths and falls required.

The main pipework looks to be 160mm that runs through the plots with a 1:90 fall. I will definitely look at having IC's inline once I get my head around a layout.

 

The fact I've never heard of an M&E plan would suggest not. What is it??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

If I wanted to run the kitchen waste to the nearest manhole, there's a 17m run. FFL to the bottom of the manhole inlet is approx 1085mm but a 1:40 fall in the pipework would only need a 425mm drop, would a backdrop manhole be the only way to do that?

 

Or do I drop it down at the start of the run and have the pipe going through the foundations? I've asked a couple of builder mates and had different responses - but they don't do new builds.................................

Edited by Vijay
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You work back from the IC - so in that case the IC is 1085 and you would need an invert depth of 660 next to the slab. If FFL is 150mm above slab then that's only 410 which is not much more than a rest bend and 120mm of pipe in it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I understand that correctly, that would mean the drainage pipe running through the foundation, is that OK to do?

 

And it's beam and block rather than a slab ;)

Edited by Vijay
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...