Jump to content

Sap calcs advise


Mike_scotland

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Mike_scotland said:

I didn't think it was that good.  What is a gppd raring for floor?

 

It depends what you are going for, mine are as follows and currently at SAP (87 / B) based on the design, though there are many other things that effect your SAP rating.

 

External walls (masonry cavity) - 0.18

Suspended floors - 0.12

Flat roof - 0.11

 

My walls are the weakest point, but i think are a good balance of performance and price

 

Exterior full fill dritherm 150mm cavity wall - FSAP.pdf

 

Blocks are £0.99 + vat each, and the insulation is about £9.20 / m2, so in terms of materials its about £30 / m2. bricklaying is about £22 / m2 per 100mm wall leaf.

 

Render about £30 / m2, and dot and dab plasterboard skimmed ~£8 / m2.

 

So its about £110 per m2 exterior wall (not including lintels etc).

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moonshine said:

 

Yeh i get it,

 

We are going ASHP so want good insulation, we are coming in at 82B i think it is for SAP rating.

 

83Bfor environment.

 

So for clarity if we put more insulation in it would perhaps be a 85B or such like?

 

 

I have seen in one of the recommendations if we got a wind turbine it would increase us to 98A haha!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The walls are not good enough. I doubt that would satisfy your technical standards in Scotland. If you really are using a 100mm timber frame you will need to internally insulate. Typical solution would be a contiguous layer of foil faced PU/PIR board like Kingspan over the inner face of the studs, all joins and junctions sealed and taped, counter battens, plasterboard. With only 100mm frame you are going to need a thick pu board, at a guess in excess of 75mm. The knock-on is making provision you set noggins and extra support for confers in the right places to pick up the plasterboard edges.

I am not making this up. I have done it already but I had a 140mm frame. My largest u values were a lot better and I achieved SAP A rate in practice.
 

Redesign now and aim for 0.1  u value for every element.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

145 i think it is 

Panels inc OSB to G/F

Spandrel Panels inc OSB to F/F

Panels inc OSB to F/F

145x45mm C16 solepate, headbinder etc

140 Frametherm 32 in ext walls

Window stops / cavity closers

Mid floor joists, assumed JJI's

150mm wool between joists

150 PIR Insulation between rafters

20 PIR Insulation over rafters

420mm in 2 layers over flat ceiling at F/F level

22mm V313 chipboard flooring to F/F

Roof trusses

19mm Sarking to trusses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mike_scotland said:

Ground - 0.15

You have previously said the ground floor is 19m x 7.5m and I gave a U-value 0f 0.11 for 150mm PIR. What is the thickness and type of the insulation?

 

1 hour ago, Mike_scotland said:

0.14 exposed floor??

Do you have a floor on the first floor which has outside environment below it? Is some of your ground floor suspended and some 'slab on ground'?

 

1 hour ago, Mike_scotland said:

Walls 0.22 (i think quite poor sounding)

 

Here is a simulation below. So about right. As I said before you should add about 100mm of same insulation or equivalent to get about 0.13. The roof is O.K.

 

 

 

mike_scotland.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, A_L said:

You have previously said the ground floor is 19m x 7.5m and I gave a U-value 0f 0.11 for 150mm PIR. What is the thickness and type of the insulation?

 

Do you have a floor on the first floor which has outside environment below it? Is some of your ground floor suspended and some 'slab on ground'?

 

 

Here is a simulation below. So about right. As I said before you should add about 100mm of same insulation or equivalent to get about 0.13. The roof is O.K.

 

 

 

mike_scotland.jpg

The outside enviroment area, could be the above the attached garage.

 

Its something lile that downstairs in size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mike_scotland said:

 

We are going ASHP so want good insulation, we are coming in at 82B i think it is for SAP

 

It can depend what ASHPs you are using using a recent model ecodan 11.5kw bum0ped my SAP rating up by 2 points

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Mike_scotland said:

 

Screenshot_20210312-184001_Adobe Acrobat.jpg

 

The assessor has you using dense block on the exterior skin. Is that really required. If you use a 7N lightweight block then the thermal conductivity falls to 0.45 (e.g besblock ultralite) which will help a bit.

How about putting 25-50mm internally to the timber stud? With 50mm I think it would get it down to 0.17 IIRC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Mike_scotland, The floor only has 110mm of insulation not 150mm and is correct. Also because layer 4 is next to a ventilated airspace its thermal resistance should be disregarded, a small additional thermal resistance, 0.29m2K/W can be added to allow for a thicker external resistance layer because of lower air velocities. This would be quite significant.

Edited by A_L
to add 'can be added'
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, A_L said:

@Mike_scotland, The floor only has 110mm of insulation not 150mm and is correct. Also because layer 4 is next to a ventilated airspace its thermal resistance should be disregarded, a small additional thermal resistance, 0.29m2K/W to allow for a thicker external resistance layer because of lower air velocities. This would be quite significant.

How do you mean? Would it help the sap or make it worse?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mike_scotland said:

How do you mean? Would it help the sap or make it worse?

Removing layer four would increase the U value and in theory make the SAP score worse but in practice may be to small to actually affect it. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Mike_scotland said:

The ASHP wont be very effective if insulation so crap.

If you can reduce the U value of the walls to the levels I have suggested then the insulation is reasonable. The major consideration after this is the air infiltration rate (draughts). At levels 'in tune' with the insulation levels the house could be heated perfectly well with an ASHP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, A_L said:

If you can reduce the U value of the walls to the levels I have suggested then the insulation is reasonable. The major consideration after this is the air infiltration rate (draughts). At levels 'in tune' with the insulation levels the house could be heated perfectly well with an ASHP.

Do you reckon add another 100mm of wool insulation to the walls?

 

 

Or whats your suggestion? 

 

Is it floor and walls that need looked at?

 

The roof is 0.12 but its a 1.5 storey sort of thing so that will be our walls upstairs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mike_scotland said:

Do you reckon add another 100mm of wool insulation to the walls?

Yes, or another insulation to the same effect, it should cover the timber studs to reduce the thermal bridging effect of heat being transferred through the timber.

 

10 minutes ago, Mike_scotland said:

Is it floor and walls that need looked at?

The walls have been dealt with above, the floor is O.K.(ish) but re-visit what I said previously what I said about having it in one layer.

 

12 minutes ago, Mike_scotland said:

The roof is 0.12 but its a 1.5 storey sort of thing so that will be our walls upstairs.

Have all/any of the horizontal and sloping ceilings and vertical walls all been considered?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...