What I see are posters gloating at their ability to save a few quid by employing the local plan drawer under the guise of “an architect” when in reality their architect is a local plan drawer who can knock up a plan in his back bedroom for next to nothing perpetuating the myth that a) architects don’t know what they are doing, can’t design or build to save their life and cause all sorts of problems on site by sh*t drawings and b) that if you can knock up a plan you are an “architect” I see this so often - daily in fact - where plan drawers are referred to as an architect when in fact they are no more than a glorified cad monkey. I daily see the results of extremely badly drawn and inaccurate “construction” drawings costing builders time and you the home owner money. No wonder architects get a bad name! The ARB - the organisation for all “real” architects (the word is legally protected by the way) have a very good website and offer free impartial advice.
Architects are required to set out what they are going to do and the cost for doing so BEFORE they do anything for you which should be set out in a schedule of services. The document is easy to read, sets out the obligations of both parties and should be clear and concise. If it’s not say so - and make sure everything is explained to you in words you can understand.
I agree that architects in the past may have been too up their own you know what and have put what they think as good design above their clients needs and budget but I think those days are passing quickly - the market is too competitive to allow grand-standing and that pedestal is getting too high.
The RIBA’s plan of work is supposed to be all encompassing when it comes to project management and on the whole should work quite capably with small projects as well as large projects.
Here endeth the lesson……..for the moment.