Phaedrus

Members
  • Content Count

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

3 Neutral

About Phaedrus

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday October 3

Personal Information

  • About Me
    Civil engineer/Project manager taking first steps into self-build
  • Location
    Near Norwich, Norfolk

Recent Profile Visitors

70 profile views
  1. Many thanks for your replies and suggestions. It's hard to say. Considerable groundworks have been completed on all three plots and my neighbour has house and garage slab laid and timber frame erected. This could work. If I put the UFH in the slab I could gain another 75mm and if I dug out a bit deeper then perhaps I could approach the 300mm EPS I've seen on Passiv slabs. Yes, I'm adding >30m2 with an infill at the rear so losing some floor area with a better wall insulation is ok. Going to a 300mm double wall + 50 cavity and brick skin is probably too much though. This seems more palatable then demolishing the lot!. Thanks, do you have a detail of what that would look like?
  2. Yes, the brick/block walls originally designed had a 100mm cavity filled with Dritherm32 batts so wall thickness > 300mm. I am prepared to go for 102.5mm brick skin, 50mm cavity, 9mm OSB, 140mm stud + further insulation & service cavity/plasterboard which would be >300mm but <400mm. What concerns me most is the insulation under the floor being only 100mm and the cold bridge at the wall/floor join. Would appreciate advice on how to do better.
  3. The site I've acquired has construction already started. The picture below shows the footings and blockwork/brickwork to DPM level (150mm above finished ground level). I wish to change the construction to timber frame and have been looking at how to get the best fabric first approach I can within the constraints already imposed. The section below shows what my neighbour who is building in timber frame has specified. I'm concerned that this isn't good enough with insufficient insulation in floor and walls and cold bridging potential. Would appreciate your suggestions on how to get close to Passivehaus standard from here without ripping up the entire building footprint.
  4. Yes, many thanks for sharing your criteria and thought process.
  5. Thanks. Please could you share the companies you considered and who you ultimately chose and why. What frame and insulation package did you go for and why? Did you choose supply only or supply/install? Did any company offer an air tightness guarantee?
  6. I am awaiting approval of my planning amendment so have not selected/purchase/installed the sewage treatment plant yet. Based on my previous experience as a civil engineer working in wastewater treatment for a time and my research since starting on my self-build journey, I would suggest selecting an activated sludge type plant with three chambers (i.e. primary settlement/aeration/clarification) with the blower housed outside the plant. I would avoid plants with mechanicals in the wastewater. I thought you were going for the cheapest septic tank available. Having second thoughts?
  7. I am pretty familiar with septic tank/wastewater treatment and drainage fields but I hadn't heard of Ezy Drain. On the face of it, it seems like a great product saving installation time and materials (i.e. no shingle/gravel or separate geotextile membrane). The product itself is not stocked by the usual online discounters and the cheapest I could find online was £49 for 3m length. I spoke to some installers and they didn't use it, presumably because it's not the most cost effective method. Housebuilder's Bible has budget range for drainage field of £2-3.5k FWIW. Septic tank to drainage field may well be the lowest cost solution for both installation and maintenance. Not sure about fitting a filter though as surely that would clog and cause problems? My inherited planning permission requires a sewage treatment plant. This gives the small benefit that the drainage field can be smaller (0.2 factor in the area calculation rather than 0.25) but more importantly the better effluent quality should extend the life of the drainage field. It also mitigates the risk of the rules tightening further, potentially making discharge of septic tank to ground illegal.
  8. Thanks for the welcomes, it seems that Norfolk/Suffolk is a hot bed for self-builders on this forum! I think I know where your split plot is 😀 Seriously I looked through your posts and see you are in the planning stages of an exciting new build. You received some good advice on the foul drainage (defo 👍 connect to mains sewer imo). Look forward to following your project as it develops. My brother's most recent self-build was a barn conversion is west Norfolk. Much harder than greenfield new build (e.g. underpinning, building in stone etc) but he's made a lovely job of it. I wish you luck.
  9. Thanks Andrew, looks good. My ridge height is only 6.3m compared to your 7m approx. Unfortunately if I reduce the roof pitch to 40deg then I'll lose a lot of usable space ☹️
  10. This is my planning condition - "The rainwater harvesting system as set out in dwg no. 02 G shall be implemented in full prior to the first occupation of the dwelling. The system shall then be maintained and managed by the occupants of the dwelling hereby approved as set out in the agents e-mail of the 9th November 2018. Reason for the condition: To minimise the possibilities of flooding in accordance with Policy 1 of the Joint Core Strategy." There is also the water use calculation aspect. I have a target of 105l/person/day and when I do the calculation I get 111l/person/day. Rainwater harvesting is calculated to give a reduction of 35l/person/day (i.e. 13l for WC, 17l for washing machine, 5l for outside use) taking the use down to 76l/person/day. Tempting but do not think I'll go down that route. Maybe will install a "Heath Robinson" solution with potential to switch to outside use only if there are problems in operation.
  11. We're in discussions with the electricity company at the moment. Overhead LV line goes straight through the plots but the original quote for connection was £13k + our own work to supply and install 125mm ducting for undergrounding the cable. I hadn't considered a full off-grid approach, isn't there a lot more to it than comparing grid connection with solar pv (e.g. battery, back-up power)? Yes, as I've started to look at this I'm amazed how cheap the solar pv panels have become! I have seen some analysis that suggests solar pv inset into the roof is now a competitive roof covering but have yet to prove it with quotes.
  12. Andrew - Does your garage/studio have a flat roof or is it effectively two-storey? The reason I ask is that I submitted the plans below to allow for flexibility for a storage/games room space and I've just received a negative reaction from planning based on the "overall scale".
  13. Thanks. The tanks I've seen from the likes of Rainwater Harvesting have a backflow filter and a submersible pump but none of these disinfection provisions. At >£2k + installation for the 3000l tank, I'm tempted to look at buried IBCs or concrete manholes which are suggested in the other thread.
  14. Many thanks for the responses and for challenging my perspective re: looking for a payback v doing the right thing and enjoying the broader benefits that these technologies provide. My parents who were early self-build adopters in the 1960s were also quick to fit solar pv and get a very nice boost to their retirement income from the legacy FIT. The solar pv/ASHP combination is therefore an easy sell for them. The only one that rankles is the rainwater harvesting which offers next to no storm water attenuation; has appalling economics; and the ongoing use of the system to flush toilets and feed the washing machine was strongly questioned in another thread I followed.
  15. My planning permission contains commitments for installation of solar PV, air-source heat pump and rainwater harvesting. I'm not wanting to go through another round of planning variations so I will install them. However, I suspect if I'd done a full cost benefit analysis then it would be difficult to justify the rainwater harvesting in particular. The solar PV hardware appears to be getting much cheaper (haven't looked at install yet) but the Smart Export Guarantee tariffs don't look particularly attractive (5.6p/kWh). ASHP makes sense I feel as there is no gas supply available to site although some of the installed prices appear astronomically high (e.g. £11-12k). Does anyone have any evidence that these eco features more than pay for themselves in purchase premium on a house sale making them "no brainer" territory?