Temp

Interesting thread.. https://customerhelp.landregistry.gov.uk/forums/general-info-and-guidance/6ab2b443-137d-ef11-a4e6-6045bdf15e68

As I recall it's to do with covenants but if there aren't any perhaps it's not a problem for the Land Registry?

There are quite a few programs that can edit embedded data. Think some can change location data. Perhaps try something like EXIFtool? Obviously work on copies to keep the originals unmodified.

Can be an issue with the land registry if both parts are in the same name. Something about covenants not being enforceable against yourself? I forget the details.

That's good because I think if it had to be "incidental to the main house" a bathroom isn't allowed. I'm reasonably sure Part M won't apply as its ancillary to the main house not a new dwelling. If you decide to ask Building Control I would emphasise that.

Is there a planning condition requiring it to be "incidental" or "ancillary" to the main house? If so which?

What's needed is a big enough bore overflow from the butt back into the drain. No need for diverting switches.

Building Control decides if you should connect.... Approved Document Part H sets a hierarchy in requirement H3 and H4... 1. Discharge rainwater to the ground via a soakaway or infiltration system (preferred). 2. If that’s not possible, discharge to a watercourse. 3. Only if neither is feasible, discharge to a sewer (surface water first, and combined only as a last resort). So you may have to show Building Control that soakaways arent possible or don't work on the site if you want to connect The Water Company decides if you may connect, eg have a legal right of connection. Edit: I checked Southern Water as I know they have combined sewers and their Web site says.. "We have no legal powers to prevent new connections from being made to existing combined sewers." although that's not quite what you asked... See the FAQ "What is a combined sewer" https://www.southernwater.co.uk/faqs/

You could appeal the condition as unnecessary but that would probably cost more.

Tip with solvent weld is to use enough solvent. If you are mean with it then it grabs too quickly. If reasonably generous you have time to rotate the pipe to the angle you want.

It certainly sounds like his infill has caused your wall to become a retaining wall and fail. However if he's not admitting liability you would probably have to go to court to get him to remove the infill and reinstate your wall. Could be difficult to prove your case unless you have photos of his side from before he infilled. Check out the Party Wall Act. It covers a lot of things but might not help unless his foundations for the new wall are deeper than those of your house (or possibly your wall?) Some councils say Building Control Approval is needed for a retaining wall over 1.5m high. Possibly because it's considered an engineering operation? Not sure about the need for planning permission. Normally heights are measured from the highest ground next to the building so that may allow him a wall 2m on his side and unlimited on yours. If you decided to complain to the planners you would have to argue he has raised the ground level on his side so the 2m rule should apply to the original ground height. It's 1m next to a highwayrather than 2m. One site says that if "you build a retaining wall within 3.7m of a street, the Highways Act 1980 requires you to seek approval from the local authority".

I probably wouldnt use washing up liquid as it will probably stay in there. Try heating the seal in bath of hot water? You could try fitting the seal in the channel then inserting the glass. Go careful with the glass as simply standing toughened glass on tiles can cause it to shatter.

Look in the loft or drill a hole through one leaf and the insulation. You can feel when the drill hits the other leaf. If you can measure the total wall thickness it's likely (but not guaranteed) to be about 200mm less than that. eg each leaf is 100mm.

Won't make much difference. Bolts are generally made to a higher standard than threaded rod but threaded rod might work out cheaper?