Selfbuildsarah Posted May 10 Posted May 10 (edited) Advice please re fire rated mineral wool cavity closure. We will be having part timber clad and part render on our MBC timber frame airtight house. Do we need different types of cavity closure according to surface. What about ventilation? A possible builder is asking what we want! Edited May 10 by Selfbuildsarah Omission
G and J Posted May 10 Posted May 10 We are timber frame, part rendered on block, part timber clad on cement board We closed the cavities in the block with mineral wall batts and have used envirogaf intumescent strips where we are clad.
Mr Punter Posted May 10 Posted May 10 With timber frame and timber cladding you will not get decent fire rating without further protection such as boards or coatings.
Nickfromwales Posted May 10 Posted May 10 5 minutes ago, Mr Punter said: With timber frame and timber cladding you will not get decent fire rating without further protection such as boards or coatings. Current 3 projects (2 x MBC PH TF & 1 x stick built PH) have needed no further protection; mixes of brick / render / cedar / composite / brick slips and more. I think it would only jump if it’s a 3 story dwelling. I’m a fan of keeping the cavities clear, so intumescent strips work well here. A few ££ more but tbh this is not somewhere where you should have any kind of compromise.
Mr Punter Posted May 10 Posted May 10 4 minutes ago, Nickfromwales said: Current 3 projects (2 x MBC PH TF & 1 x stick built PH) have needed no further protection; mixes of brick / render / cedar / composite / brick slips and more. Only the timber cladding would be a concern, as well as the "composite" if it is flammable, especially if the breather paper and sheathing are also combustible.
Owain1602 Posted May 10 Posted May 10 You will need to provide ventilation behind both cladding types, MBC insist on it. I worked through all the details for our MBC house a couple of months ago, and put a case together for both building control and structural warranty inspectors to agree. It’s quite tricky is you want to provide proper ventilation, guard against insects, allow the cavity to drain any moisture that gets in there, conform to BR cavity barrier requirements and of course….look nice. Most examples I see just close off the heads of the window reveals, and moisture then just sit against the building. Do you have any section drawings to share what you have so far?
Selfbuildsarah Posted 21 hours ago Author Posted 21 hours ago Apologies, forgot to post reply to this. Do we use the Rockwool type or the flexible pvc wrapped cavity barrier? Thank you
Selfbuildsarah Posted 18 hours ago Author Posted 18 hours ago Our QS says he can’t find a supplier for cavity barriers for timber frame! 🤔🤦♀️
Mr Punter Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Cavity barriers and firestopping is often left to "others". They often get left out as nobody really knows what to specify or order or fit. Were they specified and detailed on the architects drawings? Rockwool would be a decent choice for non-vented and Envirograf for intumescent, vented rainscreen applications. I would want detailed spec and drawings, so nothing gets missed on your order or on site.
ETC Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Advice please re fire rated mineral wool cavity closure. We will be having part timber clad and part render on our MBC timber frame airtight house. Do we need different types of cavity closure according to surface. No. ADB lists the types of cavity barriers to can use - and as long as they close the cavity they should be fine. Normally 38mmx38mm timber to the perimeter of windows and doors or bagged mineral wool by Rockwool. What about ventilation? The cavity needs to be ventilated (and drained). Where a cavity closer bridges the cavity vents and a drain should be provided.
MPx Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago You need different things for the different finishes. Ours - timber frame (MBC) will be part stone clad - off SurCav and part Wood clad. The whole thing needs to breath, but our stone mason is used to putting in what he calls fire socks to the Surcav bit. And we'll be using something like VFB 60/60 from Tenmat as cavity closures in the wood bits. I'm still worried about providing housing for a whole menagerie of critters so will be doing some more work on keeping them out, but MBC are only bothered about the need for ventilation and BC are only bothered about the fire risk so those elements are a must. Critter barriers it seems can be "model's own".
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now