Nickfromwales Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 29 minutes ago, saveasteading said: the screed looks like being between generally 55mm ish, but from 45mm to 85mm due to some extreme wobbles in the floor. That’s one heck of a wobble! These are original floors?
G and J Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago We used the u heat version (yellow rather than blue, but looks identical) the upstand on our was stiff enough to be self supporting Apologies for poor image but there's nothing supporting it in front of the sliders and we didn't staple, but as you can see screed was traditional sand and cement 1
saveasteading Posted 20 hours ago Author Posted 20 hours ago 10 minutes ago, Nickfromwales said: These are original floors? Yes there is 35mm variation on the slab, with dips occurring at various areas. It is an existing agricultural slab which was good enough for tractors and barn use. There are a few local lumps too where the slab was extended or adapted but I'll have them chipped off. Overall though, now that the rain doesn't get in, you wouldn't notice the variation, except that the sole pate is all level, packed up from zero to 35mm. The insulating slabs will follow the shapes smoothly enough. Now that the rooms are formed we can use different thicknesses of eps on the bottom, and optimise the use of insulation rather than thick screed. But sods law combining with likelihood has it that the biggest room also has the maximum variation within it.
Nickfromwales Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 20 minutes ago, G and J said: We used the u heat version (yellow rather than blue, but looks identical) the upstand on our was stiff enough to be self supporting Apologies for poor image but there's nothing supporting it in front of the sliders and we didn't staple, but as you can see screed was traditional sand and cement My preferred choice as my mate gets these traditional screeds perfectly flat and level every single time. Plus, he can manipulate levels for sliders etc which is a lot harder to do with wet concrete or liquid screeds.
saveasteading Posted 20 hours ago Author Posted 20 hours ago 21 minutes ago, G and J said: the upstand on our was stiff enough to be self supporting Ok I'll maybe buy one and fix it and give it a prod test. You appear to have a pump mix concrete that is 200mm thick or so. We will have 45mm to whatever self-levelling screed. Is the yellow stuff stapled on?
saveasteading Posted 20 hours ago Author Posted 20 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Nickfromwales said: My preferred choice you mean the yellow version? JG? Is it more robust? 5 minutes ago, Nickfromwales said: perfectly flat and level Define flat and level please? 3mm under a 3m straight edge with an overall tolerance of x? Your mate gets it right but a lot don't, from what I read.
Nickfromwales Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 1 minute ago, saveasteading said: you mean the yellow version? JG? Is it more robust? Sorry, I meant the dry sand and cement screed. The perimeter insulation is the same stuff from anywhere, just the colour changes. The differences are: height, does it have a polythene apron (for liquid), does it have a self adhesive strip on the back or not. 9 minutes ago, saveasteading said: We will have 45mm to whatever self-levelling screed. Ok. If it’s a poured aka liquid screed then you’ll be best off getting the foam skirting with the attached poly apron / membrane. Self adhesive strip helps to just lay this out, but cannot really be relied on, so you’d end up with some kind of additional, mechanical fixing (staple / round head nail). Does the Clockwork screed company operate near you? They’ve just poured cementitious self levelling screed at my Manchester project, and they were the best poured liquid screeders I have seen to date. And we’re not the most expensive quote too! https://www.clockworkscreed.co.uk With nobody EVER wanting to do this twice, or to have to revisit it, I’d defo get these guys in. They mix and pour from one super wagon. A very impressive setup. 1
G and J Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 37 minutes ago, saveasteading said: Ok I'll maybe buy one and fix it and give it a prod test. You appear to have a pump mix concrete that is 200mm thick or so. We will have 45mm to whatever self-levelling screed. Is the yellow stuff stapled on? The screed was 100mm thick, they used a pump, but it was a dryish mix, Josh shovelled sand (16ton) and cement to match like a trojan....and Jason achieved a really flat result, very happy with the job they did. No we didn't staple the upstand at all.
Nickfromwales Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago Remember to get these tight into every corner as the curves and divots all need filling / foaming / cutting back etc afterwards; if you’ve not managed this by prevention, then it’s a LOT of time and effort to get these filled and made airtight with foam / passive purple / AT tapes et-al. Put lots of time and effort into getting these filled foam strips put in as tight as you can. I cut and stop / start where it’s easier than forming a turn with continuous strip. Zero detriment when you stop / start, just tape over the joint.
Nickfromwales Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 18 minutes ago, G and J said: The screed was 100mm thick, they used a pump, but it was a dryish mix, Josh shovelled sand (16ton) and cement to match like a trojan....and Jason achieved a really flat result, very happy with the job they did. No we didn't staple the upstand at all. You don’t have to fix the upstand with a dry S&C screed, as the installers just flick a few shoots of mix against it and it pins it perfectly in place. The issue of it lifting slightly, and the screed going under it, is very real, so to remove unnecessary risk it’s always good practice to fix it so it stays down and in full contact with the insulation or sub-floor.
G and J Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Nickfromwales said: Remember to get these tight into every corner as the curves Now he tells me......
Nickfromwales Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Just now, G and J said: Now he tells me...... You never asked for your 1hr free consultancy
saveasteading Posted 18 hours ago Author Posted 18 hours ago 1 hour ago, Nickfromwales said: The issue of it lifting slightly, and the screed going under it, is very real For other readers, it is indeed a real and a very bad possibility. I have been there when it happened. Our subcontractor didn't tape the joints properly. Our plumber had insisted on doing everything from insulation up. and it was the only time ever that we relinquished control of the slab concrete. It must have been 20 years ago and he insisted he was experienced and that it was fundamental that he had the package. I became wiser on that day, The pump-mix concrete got under the PIR which floated up to the surface. Suddenly I became the only person with a clue what to do, and I had them 1. stop pumping. 2. bring in concrete blocks, tread the pir down and lay the blocks on them. after about an hour the blocks came out and levelling continued. There will still be a skin of concrete under that pir, but it all turned out ok. In hindsight I think they taped the joints in the dpm but either not properly or the concrete was spouted at an overlap and forced it off. Plus there wasn't an edge detail (the edging under discussion here, did not then exist). it was potentially very horrible, and the need for sealed laps and careful pouring was demonstrated. Thus I will supervise and inspect. Maybe I will do the first room myself to test for any difficulties. Any recommendations for a good sticky tape?
Nick Laslett Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago On 03/01/2026 at 14:14, dpmiller said: graphite EPS takes it to 0.031 or so I believe that the graphite EPS not only has slightly better U-value, but also reflects more heat back at the source. Which I don’t think u-value measures but I might be mistaken. BASF Neopor is the stuff used in my ICF blocks.
JohnMo Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 11 minutes ago, Nick Laslett said: but also reflects more heat back at the source Doubt in an UFH system. There is no space for radiation to occur.
ADLIan Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago The effect of the graphite is accounted for in the lower thermal conductivity compared to standard EPS so not dependant on application.
saveasteading Posted 11 minutes ago Author Posted 11 minutes ago I wonder if it is hyped the same way as Multifoil, ie tested in a particular context then sold in another. A reflective surface only works if there is somewhere to reflect it to. "Graphite is a good electrical and thermal conductor".
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now