SBMS Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 4 hours ago, JohnMo said: You still have to careful your not just wasting £300, with sh!te in sh!te out. I would get UFH in, which I think is done, make provision for ducts for pipes and cables through wall. Seal them up until after air test. Get house air test done, get MVHR in and commissioned, then if going down MCS route go get the survey done. Without all that in place there is a good chance it will be treated as default values for ventilation heat loss. Or just don't bother MCS at all, spend £2500 on a suitable sized heat pump, buy a 200L direct cylinder - install. Power cable and communication cable to outside unit and two pipes to UFH manifold. Then claim VAT back as it's a new house. Little over £3k in materials claim around £600 vat back, so £2400 plus a little labour. Agreed, you need the input data (fabric data etc) to be correct - but the same is said for Jeremy's tool. From what I've seen the modelling software for MCS new versions is more accurate as it accounts for PSI values. The newer MCS standard also allows specifically for an Air permeability input (the below is Heatpunk's): There's a good guide that explains this: https://help.heatpunk.co.uk/books/heat-pump-task-and-system-performance/page/ventilation-calculations-in-heatpunk
JohnMo Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 30 minutes ago, SBMS said: There's a good guide that explains But it still takes no credit for MVHR so as pretty rubbish, for anything better than an air test score of 3, which then has MVHR.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now