Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello!

My architect mentioned that the SE is proposing a block and joist foundation rather than a concrete pad (which is what I was expecting)

 

  Quote

Given the ground conditions beam and block is probably the way forward. Beam and block with insulation on top, then UFH, then screed.

Expand  

 

Just wondered if there is much difference between the two in terms of benefits, costs, etc?
 

Re: ground conditions, we live in an area with heavy clay (awaiting geotechnical investigation report)

Posted

Hi. 
 

Block and beam can be done well, but you’ll need to get the architect to set levels out to allow 150mm PIR insulation and (ideally) a 100mm slab atop; in the slab sits your anti crack 142 mesh and your UFH pipes zip tie to that. 
 

That would get you to ‘top of concrete’ (TOC) level, so then your chosen floor covering goes straight onto that, and then that’s your finish floor level (FFL).

 

Insulated raft foundations are typically seen to be the best choice, as B&B will be cold ventilated so Baltic under there during winter, whereas a raft (or strip and infill slabs) will not have the cold under them eg way better imho. 

Posted
  On 18/03/2025 at 13:10, Nickfromwales said:

Insulated raft foundations are typically seen to be the best choice, as B&B will be cold ventilated so Baltic under there during winter, whereas a raft (or strip and infill slabs) will not have the cold under them eg way better imho. 

Expand  

 

I'm hoping not to be needing to ever get under the flooring :) 

But on a serious note, realistically how much "empty space" will be under the floor
given recommendation I have seen is 225mm between floor underside and the ground. Though writing that just now it does feel like unnecessary excavation when I consider the ground floor will be 195sqm.

Posted
  On 18/03/2025 at 16:43, Big Jimbo said:

@Nickfromwales but with heavy clay, would an insulated raft "Kore" etc, even be feasible .

Expand  

You can use them in quite adverse conditions, but where there’s excess heave you sometimes have to pile and tie the ring and intermediate beams into those.

 

Very difficult to say much on here tbh, as it’s the SE’s call and also hangs on what the findings of the soil survey were. 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 18/03/2025 at 17:13, mads said:

 

I'm hoping not to be needing to ever get under the flooring :) 

But on a serious note, realistically how much "empty space" will be under the floor
given recommendation I have seen is 225mm between floor underside and the ground. Though writing that just now it does feel like unnecessary excavation when I consider the ground floor will be 195sqm.

Expand  

You will need to excavate all that out if you go for a raft or block n beam. 
you generally strip 3-400 mm of soil from the whole house area to get down to firm sub soil, if going for a raft you will excavate more. 

  • Like 1
Posted

We're going for B&B rather than raft because: a) large footprint (180m2), b) heavy clay and risk of heave, c) we've 0.75 acre to spread the spoil so no muckaway costs.

 

Yes, it will be baltic under the B&B but with 200mm PIR who cares?

 

Floorbuildup2025-03-13.thumb.png.a4935a5a72fbc0470a4ff877d6f786c6.png 

Posted
  On 18/03/2025 at 09:15, mads said:

My architect mentioned that the SE is proposing a block and joist foundation rather than a concrete pad (which is what I was expecting)

Expand  

That is a good starting point. Take it as what it is, your Architect has given you a first impression" on what might work.

 

  On 18/03/2025 at 09:15, mads said:

Re: ground conditions, we live in an area with heavy clay (awaiting geotechnical investigation report)

Expand  

I do this as the day job. Post your GI results if you want a bit of free advice on foundations. I'm not the only one floating about here on BH that knows a bit about this stuff... you can take our different views into account and weigh them up.

 

For all.. To get the best pro bono SE / Geotechnical advice post some drawings of what you want the foundations to support. Don't try and make us second guess or you will just get some generic answers, answers that are not logical or commonly folk saying .. I did this but with no supporting evidence on how it may apply to your site.

 

Your post is good in that I think.. here is someone who has an open mind who is pragmatic. Your text is short, but states the facts.

 

 

  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
  On 20/03/2025 at 22:55, Gus Potter said:

That is a good starting point. Take it as what it is, your Architect has given you a first impression" on what might work.

 

I do this as the day job. Post your GI results if you want a bit of free advice on foundations. I'm not the only one floating about here on BH that knows a bit about this stuff... you can take our different views into account and weigh them up.

 

For all.. To get the best pro bono SE / Geotechnical advice post some drawings of what you want the foundations to support. Don't try and make us second guess or you will just get some generic answers, answers that are not logical or commonly folk saying .. I did this but with no supporting evidence on how it may apply to your site.

 

Your post is good in that I think.. here is someone who has an open mind who is pragmatic. Your text is short, but states the facts.

 

 

Expand  

 

@Gus Potter, thanks for your reply. Now got the report back which I have attached. Also attached some floor plans and elevations so you can see what the foundations need to support. Any advice/feedback is appreciated.

BH Forum.pdfFetching info... Geotechnical investigation report 0- redacted - mads.pdfFetching info...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...