Jump to content

Engineered oak over UFH glue or float an which underlay?


Recommended Posts

Need to choose the engineered oak for our lounge. My questions are is there an advantage to glueing over floating and if I float it is there a special or any recommended underlay I will need to use due to the UFH? Fitting costs quoted are a fare bit higher to glue it down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Barryscotland said:

Need to choose the engineered oak for our lounge. My questions are is there an advantage to glueing over floating and if I float it is there a special or any recommended underlay I will need to use due to the UFH? Fitting costs quoted are a fare bit higher to glue it down

One advantage of gluing is that heat transfer from the UFH to the engineered wood is improved, because there is no air gap. Disadvantage is that if anything goes wrong, it’s harder to take up, but if you plan carefully and do everything by the book you won’t ever need to take it up.

Acoustalay do a decent underlay with a built in vapour barrier and overlap. It is only about 3mm thick, but has very good  compressive strength:

https://www.screwfix.com/p/acoustalay-300-premium-underlay-vapour-barrier-3mm-10m/73764
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Barryscotland said:

Seems like a silly question but would floating it make it "softer" to walk on? Softer is probably the wrong word but im sure you no what I mean, the concrete is hard on the feet so im presuming if the floor is glued straight down it also will be?

Depends on the underlay, but if you are UFH then an insulating layer doesn’t make sense.

engineered wood doesn’t have some natural “give” so much different to walking on concrete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Barryscotland said:

Seems like a silly question but would floating it make it "softer" to walk on? Softer is probably the wrong word but im sure you no what I mean, the concrete is hard on the feet so im presuming if the floor is glued straight down it also will be?

As oak does not compress under foot at all, nor does any timber for that matter, there will be no discernible difference to concrete other than the smooth finish which will make it feel 'nicer' under foot. Purely phycological imo.

 

I would bond this floor down without hesitation, as the numerous new builds I have been in that have not done this ( eg floating ) have been quite 'noisy' to walk on, even in socks, in terms of the wood moving and creaking / groaning when walked across.

 

Also, I have noticed where the floating floors meet the stairs, and other fixed junctions, the two can never be married successfully when finishing off completely flush. Instead, most floating floor require a timber or metal threshold to allow a fixed item ( such as the bullnose of the last step up onto the 1st floor landing ) to marry to a floating floor. That would bug the life out of me for the rest of my days.

 

That alone would be enough for me to bond the floor down, point 1, point 2 would fortify that decision, eg the then far better heat transfer from the UFH to the wood. That would also lend itself, point 3, to a slightly lower flow temp for the UFH to run at, as the oak would then be 'thermally coupled' to the heated deck.

 

+1 for bonding down. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may find any warranty is void if not bonded with the correct adhesive on a concrete floor with UFH.  Read the manufacturer installation instructions, for whatever make you are choosing, there will be a defined method.

 

Our clearly stated that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...