Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, ETC said:

A few more thoughts….

IMG_5294.png

Insurer - how much in % of you roof is flat

You - 100

Insurer - 🤑

  • Like 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, Bluebaron said:

thank you all for your continued input. The design ideas are interesting but i doubt the planners would agree in this case!

 

I have prepared an appeal statement and welcome any comments:

 

appeal statement.pdf 58.1 kB · 4 downloads

 

I love Para 4. - burn!

I am interested in why you don't lead with the factual error as it taints the entire decision. The rest of your points are opinion-based and could be challenged but para 4 is a real humdinger. From a weight of argument point of view I would be tempted to start with the most fact-based and work my way down to the most opinion-based

 

Regards

 

Tet

Posted
2 hours ago, Tetrarch said:

 

I love Para 4. - burn!

I am interested in why you don't lead with the factual error as it taints the entire decision. The rest of your points are opinion-based and could be challenged but para 4 is a real humdinger. From a weight of argument point of view I would be tempted to start with the most fact-based and work my way down to the most opinion-based

 

Regards

 

Tet

Yes I did consider this however it not materially affect the planning decision and I didn’t want to dwell too heavily on it apart from point out that it was missed, perhaps adding weight to overall this assessment of the site.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...