Jump to content

ToughButterCup

Members
  • Posts

    11767
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    99

ToughButterCup last won the day on May 8

ToughButterCup had the most liked content!

4 Followers

Personal Information

  • About Me
    I am building a near-passive haus standard, 146 sq m living space house. I am retired, but never been busier.
    I used to develop online teaching and learning resources for several northern universities. I also lectured in IT.
  • Location
    Junction 33 M6

Recent Profile Visitors

26295 profile views

ToughButterCup's Achievements

Advanced Member

Advanced Member (5/5)

3.7k

Reputation

  1. Statistical illiteracy writ large. Still, it got us to read the article. Instead, read How to Lie with Statistics by Darrell Huff . Its been in print since the 1950s. Penguin Books is the publisher
  2. That's nuffin @Russell griffiths - A hamster ate my underpants
  3. I - now - avoid Stanley as a brand because of its close association with America : the brand originated there (although manufacturing is now worldwide). If I can, I avoid anything American.
  4. I sorted it myself. Sorted the rat too. 💀 Easy fix
  5. Got to hand it to you. You had me there for a minnit.
  6. Rats chewed ours - not for long, but they'll chew anything
  7. @TerryE has a good blog post about the process with images and stuff
  8. Lack of: - communication - emotional intelligence - effort - self worth
  9. Yep, selfbuilding is as much about building character as a house. After ten years I'm beginning to learn to enjoy the process of dealing with both cockups and cockwombles.
  10. @kandgmitchell, and @saveasteading point to a generalisable problem inaccurate or poor workmanship is commonly excused by reference to the follow-on trades : or preceding trades and that process continues until chippies can justifiably say that they compensate for everyone else's errors of commission or omission. Added to that, there's a pernicious tendency to attribute fault to a customer who (as in this case) has the temerity to draw attention to a genuine problem. @kandgmitchell 's formula - reference to standards required by others - is a superb way of professionalising matters. Works well across all professions - apart from undertakers.
  11. Lovely house and design. Interesting Insta account. Your question may well be better directed to legal experts.
  12. Yes, you should. How you do that is the key You are not an expert - or assumed not to be an expert: and the minute you start pointing to what might - or might not - be a problem, you become a target. For his (?) ire. Raise the issue in plain straight terms: I see this [...] as a problem. Am I correct in thinking it is one? How are we going to get to the required level ? And by when ? Do not suggest an answer to your question(s) - you'd be pissed off with me if I came and asked you why you'd coded that 'class' as you did. Give clear direction on the desired outcome Supervise daily - take a benign interest in the short term, tighten as necessary Under no circumstances pay him yet.
  13. See .... told ja' ... you're missing out on a complete realm of human existence. Gay American politicians and electric wheelbarrows : yer missing out boys, missing out. #sadbuggers
  14. I don't care. Unlike some, I'm in touch with my feminine side - I use underarm spray, I choose my hair artist with care. As well as working on the build, I work out most days at the gym, I wear dungarees, my tattoos are really expensive and I file my finger nails. And Harvey Milk is my hero. I'm trying to suppress my flounce though, I'll give you that.
×
×
  • Create New...