Jump to content

G and J

Members
  • Posts

    2014
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

G and J last won the day on August 1

G and J had the most liked content!

Personal Information

  • About Me
    We’ve got planning permission to demolish a bungalow and build a modest 3 bed modern style house, with an eye on our ongoing cost to the planet.

    We need to do lots ourselves - we’ve built before in ‘91 - and we’re both retired so we hope it’ll be our forever home. Just the small matter of selling our existing house first!
  • Location
    Suffolk

Recent Profile Visitors

9122 profile views

G and J's Achievements

Advanced Member

Advanced Member (5/5)

627

Reputation

  1. +1. I might even push the boat out a bit and add an isolator. It’s only money.
  2. I naively assumed (isn’t that just so dangerous) that anyone exporting would have bi-directional doberries. The dude who fitted our solar PV/inverter/battery was most precise about what we needed where so I was all ready to go through it with our sparky who before I opened my mouth told me exactly the same thing, It made me think that everyone else knew all that and I was the only dunce lol.
  3. I think it’s first and foremost the responsibility of the self builder (in our cases at least) to design stuff that looks right in its place. Some peeps seem to feel it’s an exercise in getting as much over on the planners/neighbours as possible, which I think is a shame. I know it’s an ‘only rain at night’ type of notion but trying one’s best to build in harmony has got to be the best starting point. But I recognise that we need planners to limit the unharmonious.
  4. I’d have assumed even a couple of amps pushed the wrong way through old and/or one way RCBOs/RCD would have given them a problem. Nicely inclusive though. I can imagine the real payback being in change of attitude from apathy/impotence to yes, we can do a bit.
  5. No sure if you were referring to our comment, but just for completeness (in case helpful to others) we are bound by B4, so the relevant walls have cement board over our timber frame and fire treated cladding, in addition to the appropriate cavity closures and intumescent strip.
  6. Presumably they come with a remote clamp for the meter box?
  7. Some will be better than none, even if it isn’t in the perfect place. Let’s hope they are never tested.
  8. Other than the fact that my multi tool wouldn’t back to back blades like that ,no, I give up. Do tell.
  9. Remember the first priority of any politician is to get re-elected.
  10. It is indeed beautiful! We also missed step 2 (England) although we were careful to include as much detail of what we wanted in 1., with a statement "we expect to fine tune materials etc" and listened to their feedback for step 3. Application. Worked for us. Good luck
  11. Our sides are within a meter of our boundaries and so we have to demonstrate reasonable precautions to prevent fire spreading from one property to another. Whilst they aren’t technically enforceable it would seem odd to me to be willing to spend money on things like a robot vacuum (a similar cost level) and not on something that might save a life. In my mind once a fire is bad enough to operate the strips the house is in real trouble, the key drive is to slow stuff down long enough for everyone to get out and the fire service to prevent spread between buildings. As for positioning, I’d agree that they will be less effective at ground level, but I’d also argue that one wouldn’t want a single strip atop a 6m cladding ‘chimney’.
  12. I can imagine steel cavity closures round penetrations. I think the key thing is to close off the chimney (behind the cladding) when there is a fire.
  13. We ran out of time before the plasterboarders booked arrival to osb every wall, so did this on a couple of areas of wall where we knew stuff was 'vaguely' golng. Has worked for us.
  14. Didn’t know all that. Yet another French thing I like. There’s quite a long list of them.
×
×
  • Create New...