December 7, 20187 yr We've been talking to a few timber frame suppliers and there's a bit of a chicken and egg situation going on insomuch that they are asking us for the target u-values we want to achieve. We know we want a low-energy home with high levels of airtightness. We know we want MVHR. We also know that we need to strike a balance in terms of cost and performance as we don't have an endless budget. What I'm struggling with is what is the real world difference between having 0.12 W/m2K and 0.14 W/m2K. I know I need to model the house and I've had a look at the free PHPP spreadsheet which looks unnecessarily complex. What I'd like to find is a simpler model which basically says we have so many meters squared of wall / roof at a certain u-value, for each wall / roof and then the same for glazing but recording the compass direction it is facing so some allowance for solar gain can be made. Out of the back I simply want to know the kWh of heating required per year and then I can change the u-value and see the effects. I know this won't be perfectly accurate but should allow me to the see the relative values of different wall constructions. Does anything like that exist? Or are we looking this from the wrong perspective? Thanks.
December 7, 20187 yr 40 minutes ago, Andrew said: Does anything like that exist? Yes, it’s on @JSHarris blog ....!
December 7, 20187 yr 41 minutes ago, PeterW said: Yes, it’s on @JSHarris blog ....! Here's a direct link: Heat loss calculator - Master.txt and, whilst I'm at it, here's a link to a simple spreadsheet for calculating heat floor loss and UFH output: Floor heat loss and UFH calculator.txt Both of these are Excel spreadsheets, which the forum software won't allow, so they have been renamed to fool the system into thinking they are text files. Download them somewhere, then rename them, replacing the .txt suffix with .xls and they should open in most spreadsheet software OK.
December 7, 20187 yr 2 hours ago, Andrew said: What I'm struggling with is what is the real world difference between having 0.12 W/m2K and 0.14 W/m2K. @Andrew for the specific example in central England the saving is around 0.78kWh/m2/yr
December 7, 20187 yr 3 hours ago, Andrew said: What I'm struggling with is what is the real world difference between having 0.12 W/m2K and 0.14 W/m2K. In practical terms not a lot really. You'll need downstairs heating at least even with triple glazing and good airtightness. In my experience from running PHPP with different U factors etc if you're in the south of England you'll need a U factor of very close to 0.1 W/m2K to not need a conventional heating system.
December 7, 20187 yr Author Having now spent a few hours playing with @JSHarris heat loss calculator, just wanted to say thank you, it was pretty much exactly what I was looking for and has really helped me understand the impact of the different u-values. As others have said the difference aren't that great and were much less than I expected.
Create an account or sign in to comment