iMCaan Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago I hope this thread is in the correct section. Hi The company that is doing our house as built SAPs as asked me to sign and return Part L1A 2013 Specification to sign off the dwelling, see attached. My concern is we didn't use as much insulation as stated on the form for walls (stated 100mm but used 50mm PIR) and floor (stated 150mm but used 100mm PIR for UFH). Therefore, the house won't achieve the stated u-values. Any suggestions as to what to do? We are ready to move in. Should I be concerned? Oh boy this feels bad but I must ask, should I sign it as stated should I amended it then sign it? What are the consequences? Thanks
JohnMo Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago Email them back and state what you did, they will update the U values etc. Then if you get a fail, get ready to install solar PV to make up the difference.
Mr Punter Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago If you amend it the house will fail and you will need to spend ££££ on PV to get a pass. That said, solar PV is quite useful. It could still fail on fabric efficiency.
iMCaan Posted 11 hours ago Author Posted 11 hours ago I was hoping you would just say just sign the form without amendments. How would they know what insulation you have used? arggggh I don't have the funds for the solar After 5 years, we just want to move in.
JohnMo Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 2 minutes ago, iMCaan said: I was hoping you would just say just sign the form without amendments. How would they know what insulation you have used? arggggh I don't have the funds for the solar After 5 years, we just want to move in. Then don't ask questions you don't want a truthful answer too - which isn't what you want hear!🫣
iMCaan Posted 11 hours ago Author Posted 11 hours ago (edited) It's just frustration. I asked the questions to hear the truth. Besides solar, how long would you have to fit the solar? Can they enforce adding insulated plasterboard, which would mean a lot of work? Edited 11 hours ago by iMCaan
saveasteading Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago But have yph changed from 100 dritgerm to 50 pir? Much the same performance?
iMCaan Posted 10 hours ago Author Posted 10 hours ago Yeh we used 50mm pir insulation in walls. The cavity walls were 300mm with in total (100mm blocks, 50mm PIR insulation, 50mm cavity and 100mm stone). 100mm PIR insulation on ground floor for UFH. 25mm PIR insulation for first floor UFH. 200mm earthwool between joists. 400mm earthwool above joists. 150mm PIR insulation for slopped roof.
saveasteading Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago That's not bad insulation. the first floor insulation is irrelevant too the rating. 600mm earthwool to roof? really? and 150mm PIR to the rest of the roof. I dont have figures to hand but that might pass.
Mr Punter Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 1 hour ago, iMCaan said: I was hoping you would just say just sign the form without amendments. How would they know what insulation you have used? OK sign the form without amendments. What you have in there is broadly the same as was specified. Do you need to provide photos?
iMCaan Posted 10 hours ago Author Posted 10 hours ago For clarity...We have two attic rooms. In the eaves (unusable space), it's 200mm earthwool in joists. The vertical and slopped wall of the attic rooms are 150mm PIR boards. There's some unusable space on top of the attic room ceiling and that has 400mm earthwool. Within all cavity walls, it's EcoTherm 50mm PIR board insulation.
iMCaan Posted 10 hours ago Author Posted 10 hours ago No, there's no mention of the photos in the email or on the form.
ADLIan Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago The SAP assessor will rerun the calculation with the revised insulation details. Hopefully all will be OK if some flexibility built into the design otherwise they should advise on options to get a pass (improved air test number?). I don't think photo evidence was required under the old, 2013, version of Appr Doc L.
iMCaan Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago Thanks guys, let's see how heavy the punch would be.
SteamyTea Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Out of interest, who decided to change the specification, and for what reasons. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now