nod Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago If stupid was an Olympic sport This government would win a gold medal 1
Big Jimbo Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Have our fantastic government just announced that. That will put the muck away, skip, etc prices up.
nod Posted 22 hours ago Author Posted 22 hours ago 21 minutes ago, Big Jimbo said: Have our fantastic government just announced that. That will put the muck away, skip, etc prices up. My thoughts exactly
JamesP Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, nod said: If stupid was an Olympic sport This government would win a gold medal Yep, a race to the bottom and we are winning. Their is a lower and standard rate depending on qualifying materials. Edited 21 hours ago by JamesP
nod Posted 20 hours ago Author Posted 20 hours ago 1 hour ago, JamesP said: Yep, a race to the bottom and we are winning. Their is a lower and standard rate depending on qualifying materials. Tip of the iceberg
SteamyTea Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago So where has this 30 fold increase in price come from? Was it some recent legislation?
nod Posted 11 hours ago Author Posted 11 hours ago 53 minutes ago, SteamyTea said: So where has this 30 fold increase in price come from? Was it some recent legislation? I was listening to Andrew Marr and he was discussing it Not yet legislation But as likely as a wealth tax Sounded like a done deal for next month Is there going to be anything left for Nigel
saveasteading Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, nod said: listening to Andrew Marr and he was discussing it I have looked but can't find this story. Could be a windfall tax on developers. The landowner effectively pays. Field worth 30,000 is suddenly worth 500,000.
nod Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago 11 minutes ago, saveasteading said: I have looked but can't find this story. Could be a windfall tax on developers. The landowner effectively pays. Field worth 30,000 is suddenly worth 500,000. No £4 a tone now Going to increase I didn’t here the whole interview But I think the argument was that housing built on redeveloped sites would increase in price Which seems at odds with this government’s housing policies
saveasteading Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago (edited) OK I've had a very quick read. If, if, if. If all waste at the lowest rate was charged at the highest rate. That doesn't appear to actually be anyone's proposal, just a "what if" option. If any designers could design with waste in mind..... well some of us do and always have done. AND it was even part of uni training. Eg a motorway is designed with a cut/fill balance. No earth goes off site. By raising of lowering finished levels, widening banks, crushing rock etc. Contractors are usually better than consultants at it because it's their money and they understand reality. Ceiling heights. How much timber is wasted off a 2.4m or 3.6m or 4.8m or 6m balk? Choose to suit. Changing heights or spans can make a huge difference. Etc. Any Architects on here want to contribute? Self builders of course don't waste much on site, but may be stuck with an over-design. I may add more about skips and waste handlers later. Edited 8 hours ago by saveasteading
SteamyTea Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 5 hours ago, saveasteading said: Contractors are usually better than consultants at it because it's their money and they understand reality I am responsible for the waste at work. When I am not there, they soon slip back into old habits. As an example, we have 3 recycling bins, but our contact is only for 2 to be emptied. So I locked the lid, and put it well out the way, hidden behind 4 other bins. The dopey pillocks unburied it, forced the lid open and dumped a load of cans in it. The other two recycling bins, which were easier to get to, were both about half full. (expletive deleted)ing morons making hard work for themselves. 1
saveasteading Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 15 minutes ago, SteamyTea said: morons making hard work for themselves. And you employ them? Seriously though. Every construction project should have a waste minimisation plan. Most involved have some vague understanding that throwing away a brick or the end of a timber stud is waste. Putting that good brick, or is it hundreds? in a 'rubble only' skip is then regarded as good. Very few designers give it a thought, leaving it to others. Recycling can be an excuse instead of not wasting material in the first place.l
Oz07 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/tax-building-scrap-homes-target-3978843?ico=most_popular Most waste on a newbuild building site is pretty easy to segregate. If you're careful you don't need many mixed waste skips.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now